- This topic has 420 replies, 17 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 10 months ago by Arraya.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 26, 2009 at 7:06 PM #14919January 26, 2009 at 7:38 PM #336689jficquetteParticipant
Its ok if Obama gets our guys killed.
January 26, 2009 at 7:38 PM #337018jficquetteParticipantIts ok if Obama gets our guys killed.
January 26, 2009 at 7:38 PM #337107jficquetteParticipantIts ok if Obama gets our guys killed.
January 26, 2009 at 7:38 PM #337134jficquetteParticipantIts ok if Obama gets our guys killed.
January 26, 2009 at 7:38 PM #337222jficquetteParticipantIts ok if Obama gets our guys killed.
January 26, 2009 at 7:58 PM #336714Allan from FallbrookParticipantPartypup: It’s probably akin to mentioning to your liberal friends that Clinton was more interventionist than Bush, spent the last two and a half years of his Presidency bombing the living crap out of Iraq (in the largest sustained bombing campaign since Operation Rolling Thunder in Vietnam) and employed a sanctions program (under UN auspices) that killed in excess of 200,000 Iraqis and potentially as many as half a million.
It galls leftists to no end when you point out certain “inconvenient truths” like these.
I wonder what Michael Moore, my favorite propagandist after Leni Riefenstahl, is going to say now. Or Bill Maher? Or Jon Stewart? I’d say Al Franken, but he’s gone legit now.
January 26, 2009 at 7:58 PM #337043Allan from FallbrookParticipantPartypup: It’s probably akin to mentioning to your liberal friends that Clinton was more interventionist than Bush, spent the last two and a half years of his Presidency bombing the living crap out of Iraq (in the largest sustained bombing campaign since Operation Rolling Thunder in Vietnam) and employed a sanctions program (under UN auspices) that killed in excess of 200,000 Iraqis and potentially as many as half a million.
It galls leftists to no end when you point out certain “inconvenient truths” like these.
I wonder what Michael Moore, my favorite propagandist after Leni Riefenstahl, is going to say now. Or Bill Maher? Or Jon Stewart? I’d say Al Franken, but he’s gone legit now.
January 26, 2009 at 7:58 PM #337132Allan from FallbrookParticipantPartypup: It’s probably akin to mentioning to your liberal friends that Clinton was more interventionist than Bush, spent the last two and a half years of his Presidency bombing the living crap out of Iraq (in the largest sustained bombing campaign since Operation Rolling Thunder in Vietnam) and employed a sanctions program (under UN auspices) that killed in excess of 200,000 Iraqis and potentially as many as half a million.
It galls leftists to no end when you point out certain “inconvenient truths” like these.
I wonder what Michael Moore, my favorite propagandist after Leni Riefenstahl, is going to say now. Or Bill Maher? Or Jon Stewart? I’d say Al Franken, but he’s gone legit now.
January 26, 2009 at 7:58 PM #337159Allan from FallbrookParticipantPartypup: It’s probably akin to mentioning to your liberal friends that Clinton was more interventionist than Bush, spent the last two and a half years of his Presidency bombing the living crap out of Iraq (in the largest sustained bombing campaign since Operation Rolling Thunder in Vietnam) and employed a sanctions program (under UN auspices) that killed in excess of 200,000 Iraqis and potentially as many as half a million.
It galls leftists to no end when you point out certain “inconvenient truths” like these.
I wonder what Michael Moore, my favorite propagandist after Leni Riefenstahl, is going to say now. Or Bill Maher? Or Jon Stewart? I’d say Al Franken, but he’s gone legit now.
January 26, 2009 at 7:58 PM #337247Allan from FallbrookParticipantPartypup: It’s probably akin to mentioning to your liberal friends that Clinton was more interventionist than Bush, spent the last two and a half years of his Presidency bombing the living crap out of Iraq (in the largest sustained bombing campaign since Operation Rolling Thunder in Vietnam) and employed a sanctions program (under UN auspices) that killed in excess of 200,000 Iraqis and potentially as many as half a million.
It galls leftists to no end when you point out certain “inconvenient truths” like these.
I wonder what Michael Moore, my favorite propagandist after Leni Riefenstahl, is going to say now. Or Bill Maher? Or Jon Stewart? I’d say Al Franken, but he’s gone legit now.
January 26, 2009 at 8:03 PM #336729ArrayaParticipantAnd yet, when I mention these factoids to my *liberal* friends and colleagues, they shrug and say, “Well, we’ve got a war on terror going on, you know?
This is funny in sad way. I’ve been going thru the same things with my supposed anti-war liberal friends about the escalation in pipe-line-istan or is it poppy-lanistan.
I predicted about 6 months ago that suddenly liberals would become pro-war and the main stream conservatives would suddenly start complaining about lack of coherent plan or no exit strategy or something that they would have deemed as anti-troops 2 years ago.
It is possible they could completely loose control of they money situation and the troops may have to hitch a ride home. Surely they will raid every pension and social security before the let that happens though. Hey, world domination is expensive.
January 26, 2009 at 8:03 PM #337058ArrayaParticipantAnd yet, when I mention these factoids to my *liberal* friends and colleagues, they shrug and say, “Well, we’ve got a war on terror going on, you know?
This is funny in sad way. I’ve been going thru the same things with my supposed anti-war liberal friends about the escalation in pipe-line-istan or is it poppy-lanistan.
I predicted about 6 months ago that suddenly liberals would become pro-war and the main stream conservatives would suddenly start complaining about lack of coherent plan or no exit strategy or something that they would have deemed as anti-troops 2 years ago.
It is possible they could completely loose control of they money situation and the troops may have to hitch a ride home. Surely they will raid every pension and social security before the let that happens though. Hey, world domination is expensive.
January 26, 2009 at 8:03 PM #337147ArrayaParticipantAnd yet, when I mention these factoids to my *liberal* friends and colleagues, they shrug and say, “Well, we’ve got a war on terror going on, you know?
This is funny in sad way. I’ve been going thru the same things with my supposed anti-war liberal friends about the escalation in pipe-line-istan or is it poppy-lanistan.
I predicted about 6 months ago that suddenly liberals would become pro-war and the main stream conservatives would suddenly start complaining about lack of coherent plan or no exit strategy or something that they would have deemed as anti-troops 2 years ago.
It is possible they could completely loose control of they money situation and the troops may have to hitch a ride home. Surely they will raid every pension and social security before the let that happens though. Hey, world domination is expensive.
January 26, 2009 at 8:03 PM #337174ArrayaParticipantAnd yet, when I mention these factoids to my *liberal* friends and colleagues, they shrug and say, “Well, we’ve got a war on terror going on, you know?
This is funny in sad way. I’ve been going thru the same things with my supposed anti-war liberal friends about the escalation in pipe-line-istan or is it poppy-lanistan.
I predicted about 6 months ago that suddenly liberals would become pro-war and the main stream conservatives would suddenly start complaining about lack of coherent plan or no exit strategy or something that they would have deemed as anti-troops 2 years ago.
It is possible they could completely loose control of they money situation and the troops may have to hitch a ride home. Surely they will raid every pension and social security before the let that happens though. Hey, world domination is expensive.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.