- This topic has 285 replies, 27 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 5 months ago by
sdrealtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 24, 2008 at 9:52 PM #13412July 24, 2008 at 9:59 PM #246556
Raybyrnes
ParticipantWhen publications made real esate sexy it wasn’t too long before it started to implode.
Now they are saying nothing but doomsday predictions. Probably a good time to start looking around. Cash flow positive is probably 6 to 12 months out depneding on where you look. You are still going to need an eye for value and good negotiating skills.
July 24, 2008 at 9:59 PM #246706Raybyrnes
ParticipantWhen publications made real esate sexy it wasn’t too long before it started to implode.
Now they are saying nothing but doomsday predictions. Probably a good time to start looking around. Cash flow positive is probably 6 to 12 months out depneding on where you look. You are still going to need an eye for value and good negotiating skills.
July 24, 2008 at 9:59 PM #246713Raybyrnes
ParticipantWhen publications made real esate sexy it wasn’t too long before it started to implode.
Now they are saying nothing but doomsday predictions. Probably a good time to start looking around. Cash flow positive is probably 6 to 12 months out depneding on where you look. You are still going to need an eye for value and good negotiating skills.
July 24, 2008 at 9:59 PM #246769Raybyrnes
ParticipantWhen publications made real esate sexy it wasn’t too long before it started to implode.
Now they are saying nothing but doomsday predictions. Probably a good time to start looking around. Cash flow positive is probably 6 to 12 months out depneding on where you look. You are still going to need an eye for value and good negotiating skills.
July 24, 2008 at 9:59 PM #246775Raybyrnes
ParticipantWhen publications made real esate sexy it wasn’t too long before it started to implode.
Now they are saying nothing but doomsday predictions. Probably a good time to start looking around. Cash flow positive is probably 6 to 12 months out depneding on where you look. You are still going to need an eye for value and good negotiating skills.
July 24, 2008 at 11:55 PM #246637gandalf
ParticipantNaw, it’s not from a publication. It’s coming from Fitch. From the models they use to rate the pools…
July 24, 2008 at 11:55 PM #246787gandalf
ParticipantNaw, it’s not from a publication. It’s coming from Fitch. From the models they use to rate the pools…
July 24, 2008 at 11:55 PM #246793gandalf
ParticipantNaw, it’s not from a publication. It’s coming from Fitch. From the models they use to rate the pools…
July 24, 2008 at 11:55 PM #246851gandalf
ParticipantNaw, it’s not from a publication. It’s coming from Fitch. From the models they use to rate the pools…
July 24, 2008 at 11:55 PM #246855gandalf
ParticipantNaw, it’s not from a publication. It’s coming from Fitch. From the models they use to rate the pools…
July 25, 2008 at 6:44 AM #246722EconProf
ParticipantFitch, along with Moody’s and Standard and Poor’s, are the three major bond ratings agencies. Fitch has long been more pessimistic, and thus more accurate, than the other two.
I notice in their report that while they predict a continuing melt-down in prices for CA cities like SD and San Francisco, they predict the opposite for Texas cities like San Antonio, a theme I’ve advocated here before.July 25, 2008 at 6:44 AM #246872EconProf
ParticipantFitch, along with Moody’s and Standard and Poor’s, are the three major bond ratings agencies. Fitch has long been more pessimistic, and thus more accurate, than the other two.
I notice in their report that while they predict a continuing melt-down in prices for CA cities like SD and San Francisco, they predict the opposite for Texas cities like San Antonio, a theme I’ve advocated here before.July 25, 2008 at 6:44 AM #246878EconProf
ParticipantFitch, along with Moody’s and Standard and Poor’s, are the three major bond ratings agencies. Fitch has long been more pessimistic, and thus more accurate, than the other two.
I notice in their report that while they predict a continuing melt-down in prices for CA cities like SD and San Francisco, they predict the opposite for Texas cities like San Antonio, a theme I’ve advocated here before.July 25, 2008 at 6:44 AM #246936EconProf
ParticipantFitch, along with Moody’s and Standard and Poor’s, are the three major bond ratings agencies. Fitch has long been more pessimistic, and thus more accurate, than the other two.
I notice in their report that while they predict a continuing melt-down in prices for CA cities like SD and San Francisco, they predict the opposite for Texas cities like San Antonio, a theme I’ve advocated here before. -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.