- This topic has 165 replies, 17 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 9 months ago by
SD Realtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 27, 2008 at 12:15 PM #11945February 27, 2008 at 12:45 PM #160883
gn
ParticipantAn update:
2008 – Q4: Murrieta, Temecula
2009 – Q1:
2009 – Q2: Vista, San Marcos, Chula Vista
2009 – Q3:
2009 – Q4: Escondido
2010 – Q1: Mira Mesa
2010 – Q2: Rancho Penasquitos, Sorrento Valley
2010 – Q3:
2010 – Q4: Rancho Bernardo (including 4S)
2011 – Q1:
2011 – Q2: Scripps Ranch, Poway
2011 – Q3:
2011 – Q4: Carmel Valley
2012 – Q1:
2012 – Q2:
2012 – Q3:
2012 – Q4: RSF, Delmar, La Jolla, Solana Beach …February 27, 2008 at 12:45 PM #161176ParticipantAn update:
2008 – Q4: Murrieta, Temecula
2009 – Q1:
2009 – Q2: Vista, San Marcos, Chula Vista
2009 – Q3:
2009 – Q4: Escondido
2010 – Q1: Mira Mesa
2010 – Q2: Rancho Penasquitos, Sorrento Valley
2010 – Q3:
2010 – Q4: Rancho Bernardo (including 4S)
2011 – Q1:
2011 – Q2: Scripps Ranch, Poway
2011 – Q3:
2011 – Q4: Carmel Valley
2012 – Q1:
2012 – Q2:
2012 – Q3:
2012 – Q4: RSF, Delmar, La Jolla, Solana Beach …February 27, 2008 at 12:45 PM #161192ParticipantAn update:
2008 – Q4: Murrieta, Temecula
2009 – Q1:
2009 – Q2: Vista, San Marcos, Chula Vista
2009 – Q3:
2009 – Q4: Escondido
2010 – Q1: Mira Mesa
2010 – Q2: Rancho Penasquitos, Sorrento Valley
2010 – Q3:
2010 – Q4: Rancho Bernardo (including 4S)
2011 – Q1:
2011 – Q2: Scripps Ranch, Poway
2011 – Q3:
2011 – Q4: Carmel Valley
2012 – Q1:
2012 – Q2:
2012 – Q3:
2012 – Q4: RSF, Delmar, La Jolla, Solana Beach …February 27, 2008 at 12:45 PM #161212ParticipantAn update:
2008 – Q4: Murrieta, Temecula
2009 – Q1:
2009 – Q2: Vista, San Marcos, Chula Vista
2009 – Q3:
2009 – Q4: Escondido
2010 – Q1: Mira Mesa
2010 – Q2: Rancho Penasquitos, Sorrento Valley
2010 – Q3:
2010 – Q4: Rancho Bernardo (including 4S)
2011 – Q1:
2011 – Q2: Scripps Ranch, Poway
2011 – Q3:
2011 – Q4: Carmel Valley
2012 – Q1:
2012 – Q2:
2012 – Q3:
2012 – Q4: RSF, Delmar, La Jolla, Solana Beach …February 27, 2008 at 12:45 PM #161279ParticipantAn update:
2008 – Q4: Murrieta, Temecula
2009 – Q1:
2009 – Q2: Vista, San Marcos, Chula Vista
2009 – Q3:
2009 – Q4: Escondido
2010 – Q1: Mira Mesa
2010 – Q2: Rancho Penasquitos, Sorrento Valley
2010 – Q3:
2010 – Q4: Rancho Bernardo (including 4S)
2011 – Q1:
2011 – Q2: Scripps Ranch, Poway
2011 – Q3:
2011 – Q4: Carmel Valley
2012 – Q1:
2012 – Q2:
2012 – Q3:
2012 – Q4: RSF, Delmar, La Jolla, Solana Beach …February 27, 2008 at 1:03 PM #160912sdrealtor
Participantlooks pretty reasonable but I’d put Escondido with CV in Q2 09 and drop San marcos/Vista into escondido’s spot.
February 27, 2008 at 1:03 PM #161206Participantlooks pretty reasonable but I’d put Escondido with CV in Q2 09 and drop San marcos/Vista into escondido’s spot.
February 27, 2008 at 1:03 PM #161220Participantlooks pretty reasonable but I’d put Escondido with CV in Q2 09 and drop San marcos/Vista into escondido’s spot.
February 27, 2008 at 1:03 PM #161240Participantlooks pretty reasonable but I’d put Escondido with CV in Q2 09 and drop San marcos/Vista into escondido’s spot.
February 27, 2008 at 1:03 PM #161309Participantlooks pretty reasonable but I’d put Escondido with CV in Q2 09 and drop San marcos/Vista into escondido’s spot.
February 27, 2008 at 1:09 PM #160931nostradamus
ParticipantThis is a crap shoot. IMO it won’t be so linear. Temecula goes low, later on La Jolla goes low. Then Temecula goes even lower, and the cycle repeats… The less desired hoods will start the descent first and will end last. I think the question should be: when will the last of the last of the less-desired areas bottom out? That is the true bottom.
February 27, 2008 at 1:09 PM #161227ParticipantThis is a crap shoot. IMO it won’t be so linear. Temecula goes low, later on La Jolla goes low. Then Temecula goes even lower, and the cycle repeats… The less desired hoods will start the descent first and will end last. I think the question should be: when will the last of the last of the less-desired areas bottom out? That is the true bottom.
February 27, 2008 at 1:09 PM #161242ParticipantThis is a crap shoot. IMO it won’t be so linear. Temecula goes low, later on La Jolla goes low. Then Temecula goes even lower, and the cycle repeats… The less desired hoods will start the descent first and will end last. I think the question should be: when will the last of the last of the less-desired areas bottom out? That is the true bottom.
February 27, 2008 at 1:09 PM #161260ParticipantThis is a crap shoot. IMO it won’t be so linear. Temecula goes low, later on La Jolla goes low. Then Temecula goes even lower, and the cycle repeats… The less desired hoods will start the descent first and will end last. I think the question should be: when will the last of the last of the less-desired areas bottom out? That is the true bottom.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.