[zk]

[quote=LarryTheRenter]Was he Mexican??? Black?? White??? why do these news stories feel it is always politically incorrect to mention race..It is just the fact…why do they always leave it out!

Protect the border……Protect your home![/quote]

Turns out he was white. Fairly clean cut, didn’t look like he didn’t fit in.

[zk]

[quote=LarryTheRenter]Was he Mexican??? Black?? White??? why do these news stories feel it is always politically incorrect to mention race..It is just the fact…why do they always leave it out!

Protect the border……Protect your home![/quote]

Turns out he was white. Fairly clean cut, didn’t look like he didn’t fit in.

[zk]

[quote=sdnerd]
Now if you had a neg-am, that’s another issue.[/quote]

Or if you had an interest-only loan. There are lots of neg-am and IO loans out there.

[zk]

[quote=sdnerd]
Now if you had a neg-am, that’s another issue.[/quote]

Or if you had an interest-only loan. There are lots of neg-am and IO loans out there.

[zk]

[quote=sdnerd]
Now if you had a neg-am, that’s another issue.[/quote]

Or if you had an interest-only loan. There are lots of neg-am and IO loans out there.

[zk]

[quote=sdnerd]
Now if you had a neg-am, that’s another issue.[/quote]

Or if you had an interest-only loan. There are lots of neg-am and IO loans out there.

[zk]

[quote=sdnerd]
Now if you had a neg-am, that’s another issue.[/quote]

Or if you had an interest-only loan. There are lots of neg-am and IO loans out there.

[zk]

[quote=flu]25% off peak 2005 is nothing. [/quote]

By this I assume you mean that you believe that there is a lot more to come. If that’s what you mean, I totally agree.

Any way you slice it, a half a million dollars (plus transaction costs) is a lot of money for some poor bastard to have lost in 3 years.

[zk]

[quote=flu]25% off peak 2005 is nothing. [/quote]

By this I assume you mean that you believe that there is a lot more to come. If that’s what you mean, I totally agree.

Any way you slice it, a half a million dollars (plus transaction costs) is a lot of money for some poor bastard to have lost in 3 years.

[zk]

[quote=flu]25% off peak 2005 is nothing. [/quote]

By this I assume you mean that you believe that there is a lot more to come. If that’s what you mean, I totally agree.

Any way you slice it, a half a million dollars (plus transaction costs) is a lot of money for some poor bastard to have lost in 3 years.

[zk]

[quote=flu]25% off peak 2005 is nothing. [/quote]

By this I assume you mean that you believe that there is a lot more to come. If that’s what you mean, I totally agree.

Any way you slice it, a half a million dollars (plus transaction costs) is a lot of money for some poor bastard to have lost in 3 years.

[zk]

[quote=flu]25% off peak 2005 is nothing. [/quote]

By this I assume you mean that you believe that there is a lot more to come. If that’s what you mean, I totally agree.

Any way you slice it, a half a million dollars (plus transaction costs) is a lot of money for some poor bastard to have lost in 3 years.

[zk]

[quote=Trojan4Life]Breeze,

If everything OCR did to make his purchase was above board, why would he be worried that someone has information about his identity that could lead to him being sued?

There’s more to this than meets the eye, but the legions of BMIT readers aren’t willing to look further than their nose.[/quote]

T4L,

Anybody can sue anybody. Whether they have legitimate grounds or not. If OCR gets sued, he’s got to defend himself, and that costs money. Whether he ends up winning the case or not. To answer the questions people have been asking you about why you’re questioning OCR’s ethics with, “he’s afraid of getting sued, therefore he must have done something wrong” is to not answer the questions at all.

So you still haven’t answered the questions. And now you look like someone who’s attacked someone else’s integrity without cause. If that bothers you, perhaps you should answer the questions.

[zk]

[quote=Trojan4Life]Breeze,

If everything OCR did to make his purchase was above board, why would he be worried that someone has information about his identity that could lead to him being sued?

There’s more to this than meets the eye, but the legions of BMIT readers aren’t willing to look further than their nose.[/quote]

T4L,

Anybody can sue anybody. Whether they have legitimate grounds or not. If OCR gets sued, he’s got to defend himself, and that costs money. Whether he ends up winning the case or not. To answer the questions people have been asking you about why you’re questioning OCR’s ethics with, “he’s afraid of getting sued, therefore he must have done something wrong” is to not answer the questions at all.

So you still haven’t answered the questions. And now you look like someone who’s attacked someone else’s integrity without cause. If that bothers you, perhaps you should answer the questions.

[zk]

[quote=Trojan4Life]Breeze,

If everything OCR did to make his purchase was above board, why would he be worried that someone has information about his identity that could lead to him being sued?

There’s more to this than meets the eye, but the legions of BMIT readers aren’t willing to look further than their nose.[/quote]

T4L,

Anybody can sue anybody. Whether they have legitimate grounds or not. If OCR gets sued, he’s got to defend himself, and that costs money. Whether he ends up winning the case or not. To answer the questions people have been asking you about why you’re questioning OCR’s ethics with, “he’s afraid of getting sued, therefore he must have done something wrong” is to not answer the questions at all.

So you still haven’t answered the questions. And now you look like someone who’s attacked someone else’s integrity without cause. If that bothers you, perhaps you should answer the questions.

[Author]

Posts