- This topic has 105 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 5 months ago by SD Realtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 30, 2009 at 2:47 PM #14944January 30, 2009 at 3:01 PM #338917CoronitaParticipant
25% off peak 2005 is nothing. between 2004-2005, there was substantial (if not ridiculous )appreciation during 1 year. and plenty of people paying through their noses in 2006.
January 30, 2009 at 3:01 PM #339250CoronitaParticipant25% off peak 2005 is nothing. between 2004-2005, there was substantial (if not ridiculous )appreciation during 1 year. and plenty of people paying through their noses in 2006.
January 30, 2009 at 3:01 PM #339345CoronitaParticipant25% off peak 2005 is nothing. between 2004-2005, there was substantial (if not ridiculous )appreciation during 1 year. and plenty of people paying through their noses in 2006.
January 30, 2009 at 3:01 PM #339371CoronitaParticipant25% off peak 2005 is nothing. between 2004-2005, there was substantial (if not ridiculous )appreciation during 1 year. and plenty of people paying through their noses in 2006.
January 30, 2009 at 3:01 PM #339463CoronitaParticipant25% off peak 2005 is nothing. between 2004-2005, there was substantial (if not ridiculous )appreciation during 1 year. and plenty of people paying through their noses in 2006.
January 30, 2009 at 3:03 PM #338929zkParticipant[quote=flu]25% off peak 2005 is nothing. [/quote]
By this I assume you mean that you believe that there is a lot more to come. If that’s what you mean, I totally agree.
Any way you slice it, a half a million dollars (plus transaction costs) is a lot of money for some poor bastard to have lost in 3 years.
January 30, 2009 at 3:03 PM #339260zkParticipant[quote=flu]25% off peak 2005 is nothing. [/quote]
By this I assume you mean that you believe that there is a lot more to come. If that’s what you mean, I totally agree.
Any way you slice it, a half a million dollars (plus transaction costs) is a lot of money for some poor bastard to have lost in 3 years.
January 30, 2009 at 3:03 PM #339355zkParticipant[quote=flu]25% off peak 2005 is nothing. [/quote]
By this I assume you mean that you believe that there is a lot more to come. If that’s what you mean, I totally agree.
Any way you slice it, a half a million dollars (plus transaction costs) is a lot of money for some poor bastard to have lost in 3 years.
January 30, 2009 at 3:03 PM #339381zkParticipant[quote=flu]25% off peak 2005 is nothing. [/quote]
By this I assume you mean that you believe that there is a lot more to come. If that’s what you mean, I totally agree.
Any way you slice it, a half a million dollars (plus transaction costs) is a lot of money for some poor bastard to have lost in 3 years.
January 30, 2009 at 3:03 PM #339473zkParticipant[quote=flu]25% off peak 2005 is nothing. [/quote]
By this I assume you mean that you believe that there is a lot more to come. If that’s what you mean, I totally agree.
Any way you slice it, a half a million dollars (plus transaction costs) is a lot of money for some poor bastard to have lost in 3 years.
January 30, 2009 at 3:18 PM #338934jpinpbParticipantI’ve said before, during the ’90’s I saw 20% off the top like that!
I kept hearing how Carmel Valley is immune and I say it does not have its own sustainable economy, does not live in a protected bubble and will fall just like everyone else.
In fact, most of Carmel Valley’s McMansions were built during the bubble. Remember that back in 2000 you can still get a SFH in the 300k or so range.
In the ’90’s we did not suffer a world economic crisis, government wasn’t on a mission to bail out anybody and unemployment wasn’t anywhere near the road we’re on now. And yet CV still had a 20% decline.
Oh, there will be more to come. Alt-A and option ARMs recasting and resetting, unemployment rising, credit still tight, no more trick loans, no more musical chairs/buying up/flipping, should be interesting.
January 30, 2009 at 3:18 PM #339265jpinpbParticipantI’ve said before, during the ’90’s I saw 20% off the top like that!
I kept hearing how Carmel Valley is immune and I say it does not have its own sustainable economy, does not live in a protected bubble and will fall just like everyone else.
In fact, most of Carmel Valley’s McMansions were built during the bubble. Remember that back in 2000 you can still get a SFH in the 300k or so range.
In the ’90’s we did not suffer a world economic crisis, government wasn’t on a mission to bail out anybody and unemployment wasn’t anywhere near the road we’re on now. And yet CV still had a 20% decline.
Oh, there will be more to come. Alt-A and option ARMs recasting and resetting, unemployment rising, credit still tight, no more trick loans, no more musical chairs/buying up/flipping, should be interesting.
January 30, 2009 at 3:18 PM #339360jpinpbParticipantI’ve said before, during the ’90’s I saw 20% off the top like that!
I kept hearing how Carmel Valley is immune and I say it does not have its own sustainable economy, does not live in a protected bubble and will fall just like everyone else.
In fact, most of Carmel Valley’s McMansions were built during the bubble. Remember that back in 2000 you can still get a SFH in the 300k or so range.
In the ’90’s we did not suffer a world economic crisis, government wasn’t on a mission to bail out anybody and unemployment wasn’t anywhere near the road we’re on now. And yet CV still had a 20% decline.
Oh, there will be more to come. Alt-A and option ARMs recasting and resetting, unemployment rising, credit still tight, no more trick loans, no more musical chairs/buying up/flipping, should be interesting.
January 30, 2009 at 3:18 PM #339386jpinpbParticipantI’ve said before, during the ’90’s I saw 20% off the top like that!
I kept hearing how Carmel Valley is immune and I say it does not have its own sustainable economy, does not live in a protected bubble and will fall just like everyone else.
In fact, most of Carmel Valley’s McMansions were built during the bubble. Remember that back in 2000 you can still get a SFH in the 300k or so range.
In the ’90’s we did not suffer a world economic crisis, government wasn’t on a mission to bail out anybody and unemployment wasn’t anywhere near the road we’re on now. And yet CV still had a 20% decline.
Oh, there will be more to come. Alt-A and option ARMs recasting and resetting, unemployment rising, credit still tight, no more trick loans, no more musical chairs/buying up/flipping, should be interesting.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.