Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 15, 2009 at 11:04 AM in reply to: OT: Big Car Versus Small Car: IIHS confirms the law of physics. #381335April 15, 2009 at 11:04 AM in reply to: OT: Big Car Versus Small Car: IIHS confirms the law of physics. #381605
Zeitgeist
ParticipantThere will always be something bigger out there because of trucks transporting goods. Even if the wacko greens prevail and rid the country of the evil SUVs, larger vehicles transporting everything from food to you name it will still be on the same freeways and involved in accidents. In crashes size does count. Maybe these people who hate large SUVs should ride the bus….
April 15, 2009 at 11:04 AM in reply to: OT: Big Car Versus Small Car: IIHS confirms the law of physics. #381796Zeitgeist
ParticipantThere will always be something bigger out there because of trucks transporting goods. Even if the wacko greens prevail and rid the country of the evil SUVs, larger vehicles transporting everything from food to you name it will still be on the same freeways and involved in accidents. In crashes size does count. Maybe these people who hate large SUVs should ride the bus….
April 15, 2009 at 11:04 AM in reply to: OT: Big Car Versus Small Car: IIHS confirms the law of physics. #381844Zeitgeist
ParticipantThere will always be something bigger out there because of trucks transporting goods. Even if the wacko greens prevail and rid the country of the evil SUVs, larger vehicles transporting everything from food to you name it will still be on the same freeways and involved in accidents. In crashes size does count. Maybe these people who hate large SUVs should ride the bus….
April 15, 2009 at 11:04 AM in reply to: OT: Big Car Versus Small Car: IIHS confirms the law of physics. #381973Zeitgeist
ParticipantThere will always be something bigger out there because of trucks transporting goods. Even if the wacko greens prevail and rid the country of the evil SUVs, larger vehicles transporting everything from food to you name it will still be on the same freeways and involved in accidents. In crashes size does count. Maybe these people who hate large SUVs should ride the bus….
Zeitgeist
ParticipantForeclosures Up 30 Percent in February
Thursday, March 12, 2009
WASHINGTON — Despite halts on new foreclosures by several major lenders, the number of households threatened with losing their homes rose 30 percent in February from last year’s levels, RealtyTrac reported Thursday.
Nationwide, nearly 291,000 homes received at least one foreclosure-related notice last month, up 6 percent from January, according to the Irvine, Calif-based company. While foreclosures are highly concentrated in the Western states and Florida, the problem is spreading to states like Idaho, Illinois and Oregon as the U.S. economy worsens.
“It doesn’t bode well,” for the embattled U.S. housing market, said Rick Sharga, vice president for marketing at RealtyTrac, a foreclosure listing firm. “At least for the foreseeable future, it’s going to continue to be pretty ugly.”
The rise in foreclosure filings came despite temporary halts to foreclosures by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and major banks JPMorgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, Citigroup and Bank of America. Those companies pledged to do so in advance of President Barack Obama’s plan to stem the foreclosure crisis, which was launched last week.
Two states that contributing to the increase were Florida and New York, where temporary bans on foreclosures ended.
Zeitgeist
ParticipantForeclosures Up 30 Percent in February
Thursday, March 12, 2009
WASHINGTON — Despite halts on new foreclosures by several major lenders, the number of households threatened with losing their homes rose 30 percent in February from last year’s levels, RealtyTrac reported Thursday.
Nationwide, nearly 291,000 homes received at least one foreclosure-related notice last month, up 6 percent from January, according to the Irvine, Calif-based company. While foreclosures are highly concentrated in the Western states and Florida, the problem is spreading to states like Idaho, Illinois and Oregon as the U.S. economy worsens.
“It doesn’t bode well,” for the embattled U.S. housing market, said Rick Sharga, vice president for marketing at RealtyTrac, a foreclosure listing firm. “At least for the foreseeable future, it’s going to continue to be pretty ugly.”
The rise in foreclosure filings came despite temporary halts to foreclosures by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and major banks JPMorgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, Citigroup and Bank of America. Those companies pledged to do so in advance of President Barack Obama’s plan to stem the foreclosure crisis, which was launched last week.
Two states that contributing to the increase were Florida and New York, where temporary bans on foreclosures ended.
Zeitgeist
ParticipantForeclosures Up 30 Percent in February
Thursday, March 12, 2009
WASHINGTON — Despite halts on new foreclosures by several major lenders, the number of households threatened with losing their homes rose 30 percent in February from last year’s levels, RealtyTrac reported Thursday.
Nationwide, nearly 291,000 homes received at least one foreclosure-related notice last month, up 6 percent from January, according to the Irvine, Calif-based company. While foreclosures are highly concentrated in the Western states and Florida, the problem is spreading to states like Idaho, Illinois and Oregon as the U.S. economy worsens.
“It doesn’t bode well,” for the embattled U.S. housing market, said Rick Sharga, vice president for marketing at RealtyTrac, a foreclosure listing firm. “At least for the foreseeable future, it’s going to continue to be pretty ugly.”
The rise in foreclosure filings came despite temporary halts to foreclosures by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and major banks JPMorgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, Citigroup and Bank of America. Those companies pledged to do so in advance of President Barack Obama’s plan to stem the foreclosure crisis, which was launched last week.
Two states that contributing to the increase were Florida and New York, where temporary bans on foreclosures ended.
Zeitgeist
ParticipantForeclosures Up 30 Percent in February
Thursday, March 12, 2009
WASHINGTON — Despite halts on new foreclosures by several major lenders, the number of households threatened with losing their homes rose 30 percent in February from last year’s levels, RealtyTrac reported Thursday.
Nationwide, nearly 291,000 homes received at least one foreclosure-related notice last month, up 6 percent from January, according to the Irvine, Calif-based company. While foreclosures are highly concentrated in the Western states and Florida, the problem is spreading to states like Idaho, Illinois and Oregon as the U.S. economy worsens.
“It doesn’t bode well,” for the embattled U.S. housing market, said Rick Sharga, vice president for marketing at RealtyTrac, a foreclosure listing firm. “At least for the foreseeable future, it’s going to continue to be pretty ugly.”
The rise in foreclosure filings came despite temporary halts to foreclosures by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and major banks JPMorgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, Citigroup and Bank of America. Those companies pledged to do so in advance of President Barack Obama’s plan to stem the foreclosure crisis, which was launched last week.
Two states that contributing to the increase were Florida and New York, where temporary bans on foreclosures ended.
Zeitgeist
ParticipantForeclosures Up 30 Percent in February
Thursday, March 12, 2009
WASHINGTON — Despite halts on new foreclosures by several major lenders, the number of households threatened with losing their homes rose 30 percent in February from last year’s levels, RealtyTrac reported Thursday.
Nationwide, nearly 291,000 homes received at least one foreclosure-related notice last month, up 6 percent from January, according to the Irvine, Calif-based company. While foreclosures are highly concentrated in the Western states and Florida, the problem is spreading to states like Idaho, Illinois and Oregon as the U.S. economy worsens.
“It doesn’t bode well,” for the embattled U.S. housing market, said Rick Sharga, vice president for marketing at RealtyTrac, a foreclosure listing firm. “At least for the foreseeable future, it’s going to continue to be pretty ugly.”
The rise in foreclosure filings came despite temporary halts to foreclosures by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and major banks JPMorgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, Citigroup and Bank of America. Those companies pledged to do so in advance of President Barack Obama’s plan to stem the foreclosure crisis, which was launched last week.
Two states that contributing to the increase were Florida and New York, where temporary bans on foreclosures ended.
Zeitgeist
ParticipantAllan, thank you for your service. Question for the libs on Piggington:
“The Black Panther Party Patrols the Streets
In order to help end police brutality, the party advocated carrying guns for self-defense. At the time, under California law it was legal to carry guns if not concealed. The Panthers also took on various responsibilities in the community. Wearing black leather jackets, blue shirts, black pants, and black berets, they patrolled the neighborhoods carrying weapons, recorders, law books, and taught black history, counseled welfare recipients, and protested rent evictions.”http://afroamhistory.about.com/od/blackpanthers/a/blackpanthers_2.htm
So how about these guys. Can they support the 2nd Amendment? In other words, are you afraid of them or just the right wingers scaredy?Zeitgeist
ParticipantAllan, thank you for your service. Question for the libs on Piggington:
“The Black Panther Party Patrols the Streets
In order to help end police brutality, the party advocated carrying guns for self-defense. At the time, under California law it was legal to carry guns if not concealed. The Panthers also took on various responsibilities in the community. Wearing black leather jackets, blue shirts, black pants, and black berets, they patrolled the neighborhoods carrying weapons, recorders, law books, and taught black history, counseled welfare recipients, and protested rent evictions.”http://afroamhistory.about.com/od/blackpanthers/a/blackpanthers_2.htm
So how about these guys. Can they support the 2nd Amendment? In other words, are you afraid of them or just the right wingers scaredy?Zeitgeist
ParticipantAllan, thank you for your service. Question for the libs on Piggington:
“The Black Panther Party Patrols the Streets
In order to help end police brutality, the party advocated carrying guns for self-defense. At the time, under California law it was legal to carry guns if not concealed. The Panthers also took on various responsibilities in the community. Wearing black leather jackets, blue shirts, black pants, and black berets, they patrolled the neighborhoods carrying weapons, recorders, law books, and taught black history, counseled welfare recipients, and protested rent evictions.”http://afroamhistory.about.com/od/blackpanthers/a/blackpanthers_2.htm
So how about these guys. Can they support the 2nd Amendment? In other words, are you afraid of them or just the right wingers scaredy?Zeitgeist
ParticipantAllan, thank you for your service. Question for the libs on Piggington:
“The Black Panther Party Patrols the Streets
In order to help end police brutality, the party advocated carrying guns for self-defense. At the time, under California law it was legal to carry guns if not concealed. The Panthers also took on various responsibilities in the community. Wearing black leather jackets, blue shirts, black pants, and black berets, they patrolled the neighborhoods carrying weapons, recorders, law books, and taught black history, counseled welfare recipients, and protested rent evictions.”http://afroamhistory.about.com/od/blackpanthers/a/blackpanthers_2.htm
So how about these guys. Can they support the 2nd Amendment? In other words, are you afraid of them or just the right wingers scaredy?Zeitgeist
ParticipantAllan, thank you for your service. Question for the libs on Piggington:
“The Black Panther Party Patrols the Streets
In order to help end police brutality, the party advocated carrying guns for self-defense. At the time, under California law it was legal to carry guns if not concealed. The Panthers also took on various responsibilities in the community. Wearing black leather jackets, blue shirts, black pants, and black berets, they patrolled the neighborhoods carrying weapons, recorders, law books, and taught black history, counseled welfare recipients, and protested rent evictions.”http://afroamhistory.about.com/od/blackpanthers/a/blackpanthers_2.htm
So how about these guys. Can they support the 2nd Amendment? In other words, are you afraid of them or just the right wingers scaredy? -
AuthorPosts