Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Zeitgeist
ParticipantMr. Steve from Nigeria.
ParticipantMr. Steve from Nigeria.
ParticipantMr. Steve from Nigeria.
ParticipantMr. Steve from Nigeria.
ParticipantIt is called insurance for a reason. It is health insurance, not health care. Like Immigration, there is room for reform, but the pork packed bill is going to be a time bomb if it passes. Not only that, there are some people whether they are very wealthy or very healthy and young, who forego health insurance because they do not use it. Why should they pay for other people? We already have a safety net for indigents and TG knows this is not about health care reform, it is just another big government power grab. No takers on the children limit? Does that mean even the libs understand when there is too much government? Maybe there should be a parenting test? We test drivers, why not parents? It might cut down on the prison population. That would be a good thing.
ParticipantIt is called insurance for a reason. It is health insurance, not health care. Like Immigration, there is room for reform, but the pork packed bill is going to be a time bomb if it passes. Not only that, there are some people whether they are very wealthy or very healthy and young, who forego health insurance because they do not use it. Why should they pay for other people? We already have a safety net for indigents and TG knows this is not about health care reform, it is just another big government power grab. No takers on the children limit? Does that mean even the libs understand when there is too much government? Maybe there should be a parenting test? We test drivers, why not parents? It might cut down on the prison population. That would be a good thing.
ParticipantIt is called insurance for a reason. It is health insurance, not health care. Like Immigration, there is room for reform, but the pork packed bill is going to be a time bomb if it passes. Not only that, there are some people whether they are very wealthy or very healthy and young, who forego health insurance because they do not use it. Why should they pay for other people? We already have a safety net for indigents and TG knows this is not about health care reform, it is just another big government power grab. No takers on the children limit? Does that mean even the libs understand when there is too much government? Maybe there should be a parenting test? We test drivers, why not parents? It might cut down on the prison population. That would be a good thing.
ParticipantIt is called insurance for a reason. It is health insurance, not health care. Like Immigration, there is room for reform, but the pork packed bill is going to be a time bomb if it passes. Not only that, there are some people whether they are very wealthy or very healthy and young, who forego health insurance because they do not use it. Why should they pay for other people? We already have a safety net for indigents and TG knows this is not about health care reform, it is just another big government power grab. No takers on the children limit? Does that mean even the libs understand when there is too much government? Maybe there should be a parenting test? We test drivers, why not parents? It might cut down on the prison population. That would be a good thing.
ParticipantIt is called insurance for a reason. It is health insurance, not health care. Like Immigration, there is room for reform, but the pork packed bill is going to be a time bomb if it passes. Not only that, there are some people whether they are very wealthy or very healthy and young, who forego health insurance because they do not use it. Why should they pay for other people? We already have a safety net for indigents and TG knows this is not about health care reform, it is just another big government power grab. No takers on the children limit? Does that mean even the libs understand when there is too much government? Maybe there should be a parenting test? We test drivers, why not parents? It might cut down on the prison population. That would be a good thing.
July 24, 2009 at 10:45 AM in reply to: Intentional defaulting, not subprime mortgage is the problem #436145ParticipantGoldman Sachs the Obama Administration’s Haliburton?
http://cromsworldnews.blogspot.com/2009/07/goldman-sachs-obama-administration.html
July 24, 2009 at 10:45 AM in reply to: Intentional defaulting, not subprime mortgage is the problem #436352ParticipantGoldman Sachs the Obama Administration’s Haliburton?
http://cromsworldnews.blogspot.com/2009/07/goldman-sachs-obama-administration.html
July 24, 2009 at 10:45 AM in reply to: Intentional defaulting, not subprime mortgage is the problem #436671ParticipantGoldman Sachs the Obama Administration’s Haliburton?
http://cromsworldnews.blogspot.com/2009/07/goldman-sachs-obama-administration.html
July 24, 2009 at 10:45 AM in reply to: Intentional defaulting, not subprime mortgage is the problem #436744ParticipantGoldman Sachs the Obama Administration’s Haliburton?
http://cromsworldnews.blogspot.com/2009/07/goldman-sachs-obama-administration.html
July 24, 2009 at 10:45 AM in reply to: Intentional defaulting, not subprime mortgage is the problem #436910ParticipantGoldman Sachs the Obama Administration’s Haliburton?
http://cromsworldnews.blogspot.com/2009/07/goldman-sachs-obama-administration.html
-
AuthorPosts