Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
ybitz
Participant[quote=Leorocky]nobody “pays in” in CA. The premiums are 100% funded by your employer.[/quote]
Well, the employer makes money off of your labor, and if the employer did not have to pay the unemployment tax one’s pay would presumably be higher. So in many ways it’s the same as if you had to pay it…comes down to semantics.
Reminds me of the saying that buyers don’t pay commission for real estate agents, the seller does, so you might as well as one because they are free. Always seemed silly to me, since the buyer is the only one bringing money to the table, so in essence is the one that is actually paying the cost of the commissions.Participant[quote=Leorocky]nobody “pays in” in CA. The premiums are 100% funded by your employer.[/quote]
Well, the employer makes money off of your labor, and if the employer did not have to pay the unemployment tax one’s pay would presumably be higher. So in many ways it’s the same as if you had to pay it…comes down to semantics.
Reminds me of the saying that buyers don’t pay commission for real estate agents, the seller does, so you might as well as one because they are free. Always seemed silly to me, since the buyer is the only one bringing money to the table, so in essence is the one that is actually paying the cost of the commissions.Participant[quote=Leorocky]nobody “pays in” in CA. The premiums are 100% funded by your employer.[/quote]
Well, the employer makes money off of your labor, and if the employer did not have to pay the unemployment tax one’s pay would presumably be higher. So in many ways it’s the same as if you had to pay it…comes down to semantics.
Reminds me of the saying that buyers don’t pay commission for real estate agents, the seller does, so you might as well as one because they are free. Always seemed silly to me, since the buyer is the only one bringing money to the table, so in essence is the one that is actually paying the cost of the commissions.Participant1989 sounds like a relatively new house still. Many of the houses in San Diego area are built in the 70s and are still holding up well. It’s to tell up front without a good inspection.
Participant1989 sounds like a relatively new house still. Many of the houses in San Diego area are built in the 70s and are still holding up well. It’s to tell up front without a good inspection.
Participant1989 sounds like a relatively new house still. Many of the houses in San Diego area are built in the 70s and are still holding up well. It’s to tell up front without a good inspection.
Participant1989 sounds like a relatively new house still. Many of the houses in San Diego area are built in the 70s and are still holding up well. It’s to tell up front without a good inspection.
Participant1989 sounds like a relatively new house still. Many of the houses in San Diego area are built in the 70s and are still holding up well. It’s to tell up front without a good inspection.
ParticipantYeah, the original post to this current thread got through (didn’t even prompt for captcha), but I still cannot start a thread that I wanted to create originally. The post that triggers the spam blocker is this:
Think the government will pony up another $15.3 billion to bail out Fannie?
followed immediately by a link to money.cnn.com. Even in this current comment, as soon as I copy and paste in the cnn.com link, it won’t let me preview/save the comment — not even a captcha option. If I remove the link, it will work (obviously) with a captcha test.
ParticipantYeah, the original post to this current thread got through (didn’t even prompt for captcha), but I still cannot start a thread that I wanted to create originally. The post that triggers the spam blocker is this:
Think the government will pony up another $15.3 billion to bail out Fannie?
followed immediately by a link to money.cnn.com. Even in this current comment, as soon as I copy and paste in the cnn.com link, it won’t let me preview/save the comment — not even a captcha option. If I remove the link, it will work (obviously) with a captcha test.
ParticipantYeah, the original post to this current thread got through (didn’t even prompt for captcha), but I still cannot start a thread that I wanted to create originally. The post that triggers the spam blocker is this:
Think the government will pony up another $15.3 billion to bail out Fannie?
followed immediately by a link to money.cnn.com. Even in this current comment, as soon as I copy and paste in the cnn.com link, it won’t let me preview/save the comment — not even a captcha option. If I remove the link, it will work (obviously) with a captcha test.
ParticipantYeah, the original post to this current thread got through (didn’t even prompt for captcha), but I still cannot start a thread that I wanted to create originally. The post that triggers the spam blocker is this:
Think the government will pony up another $15.3 billion to bail out Fannie?
followed immediately by a link to money.cnn.com. Even in this current comment, as soon as I copy and paste in the cnn.com link, it won’t let me preview/save the comment — not even a captcha option. If I remove the link, it will work (obviously) with a captcha test.
ParticipantYeah, the original post to this current thread got through (didn’t even prompt for captcha), but I still cannot start a thread that I wanted to create originally. The post that triggers the spam blocker is this:
Think the government will pony up another $15.3 billion to bail out Fannie?
followed immediately by a link to money.cnn.com. Even in this current comment, as soon as I copy and paste in the cnn.com link, it won’t let me preview/save the comment — not even a captcha option. If I remove the link, it will work (obviously) with a captcha test.
February 11, 2010 at 6:59 PM in reply to: Recommended Realtor – North Park/South Park market #512902ParticipantRedfin. You get half the commission back.
-
AuthorPosts
