Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
XBoxBoy
ParticipantEsmith wrote: This is not good for the housing market….
Maybe so, but it is excellent news for us bitter renters. Now if rates will just continue their current trend.
XBoxBoy
ParticipantEsmith wrote: This is not good for the housing market….
Maybe so, but it is excellent news for us bitter renters. Now if rates will just continue their current trend.
XBoxBoy
ParticipantEqualizer – UTC Condo address.
Sorry, I forgot to include the link.
929 Regents Rd #L127http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-5C429537-9229_Regents_Rd_L127_La_Jolla_CA_92037
ParticipantEqualizer – UTC Condo address.
Sorry, I forgot to include the link.
929 Regents Rd #L127http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-5C429537-9229_Regents_Rd_L127_La_Jolla_CA_92037
ParticipantEqualizer – UTC Condo address.
Sorry, I forgot to include the link.
929 Regents Rd #L127http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-5C429537-9229_Regents_Rd_L127_La_Jolla_CA_92037
ParticipantEqualizer – UTC Condo address.
Sorry, I forgot to include the link.
929 Regents Rd #L127http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-5C429537-9229_Regents_Rd_L127_La_Jolla_CA_92037
ParticipantEqualizer – UTC Condo address.
Sorry, I forgot to include the link.
929 Regents Rd #L127http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-5C429537-9229_Regents_Rd_L127_La_Jolla_CA_92037
ParticipantOuch, that smarts….
Looks like we have a couple new entries proving that prices in La Jolla are not holding up as well as the realtors at open houses keep trying to say they are.
Just in today…
Bought in 2006 for $2,300,000 and just sold for $1,865,000. Poof, $435,000 disappears! 19% in two years
http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-5CDDB23F-716_La_Canada_St_La_Jolla_CA_92037
btw, I went to this house when it was an open house, and it’s in a fantastic part of bird rock, and was a very nice house with great curb appeal. This is not some junky foreclosure.And here’s a condo up by UTC (I know, some of you don’t want to call the area east of the 5 La Jolla, but it’s got a 92037 zip, so I’m gonna include it anyway)
Bought in 2006 for $535,000 and just sold for $391,500. A loss of $143,500 in just over two years. That’s a 27% loss for those of you who want percents.There more losses from condo’s east of the 5, but I figure one good example sets the tone.
XBoxBoy.
ParticipantOuch, that smarts….
Looks like we have a couple new entries proving that prices in La Jolla are not holding up as well as the realtors at open houses keep trying to say they are.
Just in today…
Bought in 2006 for $2,300,000 and just sold for $1,865,000. Poof, $435,000 disappears! 19% in two years
http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-5CDDB23F-716_La_Canada_St_La_Jolla_CA_92037
btw, I went to this house when it was an open house, and it’s in a fantastic part of bird rock, and was a very nice house with great curb appeal. This is not some junky foreclosure.And here’s a condo up by UTC (I know, some of you don’t want to call the area east of the 5 La Jolla, but it’s got a 92037 zip, so I’m gonna include it anyway)
Bought in 2006 for $535,000 and just sold for $391,500. A loss of $143,500 in just over two years. That’s a 27% loss for those of you who want percents.There more losses from condo’s east of the 5, but I figure one good example sets the tone.
XBoxBoy.
ParticipantOuch, that smarts….
Looks like we have a couple new entries proving that prices in La Jolla are not holding up as well as the realtors at open houses keep trying to say they are.
Just in today…
Bought in 2006 for $2,300,000 and just sold for $1,865,000. Poof, $435,000 disappears! 19% in two years
http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-5CDDB23F-716_La_Canada_St_La_Jolla_CA_92037
btw, I went to this house when it was an open house, and it’s in a fantastic part of bird rock, and was a very nice house with great curb appeal. This is not some junky foreclosure.And here’s a condo up by UTC (I know, some of you don’t want to call the area east of the 5 La Jolla, but it’s got a 92037 zip, so I’m gonna include it anyway)
Bought in 2006 for $535,000 and just sold for $391,500. A loss of $143,500 in just over two years. That’s a 27% loss for those of you who want percents.There more losses from condo’s east of the 5, but I figure one good example sets the tone.
XBoxBoy.
ParticipantOuch, that smarts….
Looks like we have a couple new entries proving that prices in La Jolla are not holding up as well as the realtors at open houses keep trying to say they are.
Just in today…
Bought in 2006 for $2,300,000 and just sold for $1,865,000. Poof, $435,000 disappears! 19% in two years
http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-5CDDB23F-716_La_Canada_St_La_Jolla_CA_92037
btw, I went to this house when it was an open house, and it’s in a fantastic part of bird rock, and was a very nice house with great curb appeal. This is not some junky foreclosure.And here’s a condo up by UTC (I know, some of you don’t want to call the area east of the 5 La Jolla, but it’s got a 92037 zip, so I’m gonna include it anyway)
Bought in 2006 for $535,000 and just sold for $391,500. A loss of $143,500 in just over two years. That’s a 27% loss for those of you who want percents.There more losses from condo’s east of the 5, but I figure one good example sets the tone.
XBoxBoy.
ParticipantOuch, that smarts….
Looks like we have a couple new entries proving that prices in La Jolla are not holding up as well as the realtors at open houses keep trying to say they are.
Just in today…
Bought in 2006 for $2,300,000 and just sold for $1,865,000. Poof, $435,000 disappears! 19% in two years
http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-5CDDB23F-716_La_Canada_St_La_Jolla_CA_92037
btw, I went to this house when it was an open house, and it’s in a fantastic part of bird rock, and was a very nice house with great curb appeal. This is not some junky foreclosure.And here’s a condo up by UTC (I know, some of you don’t want to call the area east of the 5 La Jolla, but it’s got a 92037 zip, so I’m gonna include it anyway)
Bought in 2006 for $535,000 and just sold for $391,500. A loss of $143,500 in just over two years. That’s a 27% loss for those of you who want percents.There more losses from condo’s east of the 5, but I figure one good example sets the tone.
XBoxBoy.
June 7, 2008 at 8:34 AM in reply to: Housing Foreclosure Story-Who pays the price for greed and dishonesty? #218926Participantgdcox claims: You cannot blame banks when the applicant and broker collude to lie about income.
If the bank willing turned a blind eye, knowing that they would unload the loan to someone else before it went south, then yes I think the banks deserve just as much blame. It is astonishing to me that banks went along with this whole no-doc thing. What person or business lends out money without verifying that the person is who they say they are, and that they stand a reasonable chance of being repaid?
Also, you say we’ve lost respect for the law and I would say that we’ve never had respect for the law in this country. But what we have lost is respect for honesty, which I do believe we used to have respect for. And that is indeed much more of a threat to the USA than Iranians.
XBoxBoy
June 7, 2008 at 8:34 AM in reply to: Housing Foreclosure Story-Who pays the price for greed and dishonesty? #218959Participantgdcox claims: You cannot blame banks when the applicant and broker collude to lie about income.
If the bank willing turned a blind eye, knowing that they would unload the loan to someone else before it went south, then yes I think the banks deserve just as much blame. It is astonishing to me that banks went along with this whole no-doc thing. What person or business lends out money without verifying that the person is who they say they are, and that they stand a reasonable chance of being repaid?
Also, you say we’ve lost respect for the law and I would say that we’ve never had respect for the law in this country. But what we have lost is respect for honesty, which I do believe we used to have respect for. And that is indeed much more of a threat to the USA than Iranians.
XBoxBoy
-
AuthorPosts
