Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
XBoxBoy
Participant[quote=stockstradr]Now, help me out. Best way to take advantage of this reversal? I think we need to find a good short-term treasury fund to short.
[/quote]Wouldn’t it be better to short a long term treasury fund? Long term bonds are the ones that are going to suffer the most if the bubble bursts I would think.
[quote=stockstradr]Don’t forget to consider that really smart economists with good track records of predicting this overall financial mess (Roubini..etc) see this recession pulling CPI down to ZERO or even a couple percent BELOW zero, during the most intense quarters of deflation.[/quote]
Yeah, but don’t forget to consider that the CPI is massaged by the government to produce the results they want, and is a fairly worthless statistic.
If this stock market rally continues for a couple of days, and main stream media continues to sound the all clear, I suspect we will find out whether or not treasuries are a bubble very quickly here.
XBoxBoy
Participant[quote=stockstradr]Now, help me out. Best way to take advantage of this reversal? I think we need to find a good short-term treasury fund to short.
[/quote]Wouldn’t it be better to short a long term treasury fund? Long term bonds are the ones that are going to suffer the most if the bubble bursts I would think.
[quote=stockstradr]Don’t forget to consider that really smart economists with good track records of predicting this overall financial mess (Roubini..etc) see this recession pulling CPI down to ZERO or even a couple percent BELOW zero, during the most intense quarters of deflation.[/quote]
Yeah, but don’t forget to consider that the CPI is massaged by the government to produce the results they want, and is a fairly worthless statistic.
If this stock market rally continues for a couple of days, and main stream media continues to sound the all clear, I suspect we will find out whether or not treasuries are a bubble very quickly here.
XBoxBoy
Participant[quote=gandalf]Much more important to throw the right-wing GOP off the bus this election. That includes the fraudsters Bilbray and Issa. Throw the BUMS out.
[/quote]Well, I’d agree that Bush and the Neo-cons have made a mess of things, but I think it’s also important to point out that both Bilbray and Issa were vocally against the bailout and voted against it. (And in so doing were voting against Bush and his administration flunkies while Susan Davis was voting for Bush administration policies.)
XBoxBoy
Participant[quote=gandalf]Much more important to throw the right-wing GOP off the bus this election. That includes the fraudsters Bilbray and Issa. Throw the BUMS out.
[/quote]Well, I’d agree that Bush and the Neo-cons have made a mess of things, but I think it’s also important to point out that both Bilbray and Issa were vocally against the bailout and voted against it. (And in so doing were voting against Bush and his administration flunkies while Susan Davis was voting for Bush administration policies.)
XBoxBoy
Participant[quote=gandalf]Much more important to throw the right-wing GOP off the bus this election. That includes the fraudsters Bilbray and Issa. Throw the BUMS out.
[/quote]Well, I’d agree that Bush and the Neo-cons have made a mess of things, but I think it’s also important to point out that both Bilbray and Issa were vocally against the bailout and voted against it. (And in so doing were voting against Bush and his administration flunkies while Susan Davis was voting for Bush administration policies.)
XBoxBoy
Participant[quote=gandalf]Much more important to throw the right-wing GOP off the bus this election. That includes the fraudsters Bilbray and Issa. Throw the BUMS out.
[/quote]Well, I’d agree that Bush and the Neo-cons have made a mess of things, but I think it’s also important to point out that both Bilbray and Issa were vocally against the bailout and voted against it. (And in so doing were voting against Bush and his administration flunkies while Susan Davis was voting for Bush administration policies.)
XBoxBoy
Participant[quote=gandalf]Much more important to throw the right-wing GOP off the bus this election. That includes the fraudsters Bilbray and Issa. Throw the BUMS out.
[/quote]Well, I’d agree that Bush and the Neo-cons have made a mess of things, but I think it’s also important to point out that both Bilbray and Issa were vocally against the bailout and voted against it. (And in so doing were voting against Bush and his administration flunkies while Susan Davis was voting for Bush administration policies.)
XBoxBoy
ParticipantSeems to me the question of are bonds a bubble hangs on two issues.
1) Are we headed for inflation or deflation?
2) How long will our foreign creditors continue to buy our debt?If we are headed for a period of steep deflation, then treasuries could be a decent investment. At least they won’t lose nominal value. (As opposed to hard assets or stocks which typically lose value in a deflationary environment.) And given that the Govt. can always print dollars at least you know that you’ll get paid when the time comes. Of course that last point also is the main reason that so many think that deflation isn’t an issue, that inflation is the threat. And given Helicopter Ben’s previous statements that he would never allow deflation to take hold, those arguing that inflation will be the issue have a point. But if I had to pick between inflation and deflation, I’d probably pick neither. Ben and Co. will try to print money as fast as it disappears and not any faster. They might not get it exactly right, and it could certainly be rocky, but they’ll probably be in the ball park.
But personally I think the second question is the ringer. If our foreign creditors continue to buy and hold our debt then even if it is a bubble, it won’t pop, so what do we care if it’s a bubble? Of course if our foreign creditors start to balk at buying all the new debt that the government is going to need to float to cover the costs of these bailouts it’s a different picture. At that point, the government might find itself in a really ugly position.
The obvious problem would be that as people stop buying treasuries and the government continues creating them, the interest rates would skyrocket. (I guess that would qualify as the burst bubble, now wouldn’t it) It certainly would be conceivable that that interest rates would skyrocket, the government would still need to print more money to get the economy back on it’s feet.
But my problem is that I’m not smart enough to know which way these things will go. It took all my mental abilities just to figure out what the parameters of the problem are. So, maybe some of you guys who are knowledgable about this could chime in and inform us. Are we going to see massive deflation, or can Ben and Co fend that off? And always the wild card, what will our foreign investors do? Will they keep buying our bonds? Or will they decide at some point enough is enough. If we go into a massive global recession, could china take the trillion in treasuries they have and use that to buy raw materials for their economy?
XBoxBoy
ParticipantSeems to me the question of are bonds a bubble hangs on two issues.
1) Are we headed for inflation or deflation?
2) How long will our foreign creditors continue to buy our debt?If we are headed for a period of steep deflation, then treasuries could be a decent investment. At least they won’t lose nominal value. (As opposed to hard assets or stocks which typically lose value in a deflationary environment.) And given that the Govt. can always print dollars at least you know that you’ll get paid when the time comes. Of course that last point also is the main reason that so many think that deflation isn’t an issue, that inflation is the threat. And given Helicopter Ben’s previous statements that he would never allow deflation to take hold, those arguing that inflation will be the issue have a point. But if I had to pick between inflation and deflation, I’d probably pick neither. Ben and Co. will try to print money as fast as it disappears and not any faster. They might not get it exactly right, and it could certainly be rocky, but they’ll probably be in the ball park.
But personally I think the second question is the ringer. If our foreign creditors continue to buy and hold our debt then even if it is a bubble, it won’t pop, so what do we care if it’s a bubble? Of course if our foreign creditors start to balk at buying all the new debt that the government is going to need to float to cover the costs of these bailouts it’s a different picture. At that point, the government might find itself in a really ugly position.
The obvious problem would be that as people stop buying treasuries and the government continues creating them, the interest rates would skyrocket. (I guess that would qualify as the burst bubble, now wouldn’t it) It certainly would be conceivable that that interest rates would skyrocket, the government would still need to print more money to get the economy back on it’s feet.
But my problem is that I’m not smart enough to know which way these things will go. It took all my mental abilities just to figure out what the parameters of the problem are. So, maybe some of you guys who are knowledgable about this could chime in and inform us. Are we going to see massive deflation, or can Ben and Co fend that off? And always the wild card, what will our foreign investors do? Will they keep buying our bonds? Or will they decide at some point enough is enough. If we go into a massive global recession, could china take the trillion in treasuries they have and use that to buy raw materials for their economy?
XBoxBoy
ParticipantSeems to me the question of are bonds a bubble hangs on two issues.
1) Are we headed for inflation or deflation?
2) How long will our foreign creditors continue to buy our debt?If we are headed for a period of steep deflation, then treasuries could be a decent investment. At least they won’t lose nominal value. (As opposed to hard assets or stocks which typically lose value in a deflationary environment.) And given that the Govt. can always print dollars at least you know that you’ll get paid when the time comes. Of course that last point also is the main reason that so many think that deflation isn’t an issue, that inflation is the threat. And given Helicopter Ben’s previous statements that he would never allow deflation to take hold, those arguing that inflation will be the issue have a point. But if I had to pick between inflation and deflation, I’d probably pick neither. Ben and Co. will try to print money as fast as it disappears and not any faster. They might not get it exactly right, and it could certainly be rocky, but they’ll probably be in the ball park.
But personally I think the second question is the ringer. If our foreign creditors continue to buy and hold our debt then even if it is a bubble, it won’t pop, so what do we care if it’s a bubble? Of course if our foreign creditors start to balk at buying all the new debt that the government is going to need to float to cover the costs of these bailouts it’s a different picture. At that point, the government might find itself in a really ugly position.
The obvious problem would be that as people stop buying treasuries and the government continues creating them, the interest rates would skyrocket. (I guess that would qualify as the burst bubble, now wouldn’t it) It certainly would be conceivable that that interest rates would skyrocket, the government would still need to print more money to get the economy back on it’s feet.
But my problem is that I’m not smart enough to know which way these things will go. It took all my mental abilities just to figure out what the parameters of the problem are. So, maybe some of you guys who are knowledgable about this could chime in and inform us. Are we going to see massive deflation, or can Ben and Co fend that off? And always the wild card, what will our foreign investors do? Will they keep buying our bonds? Or will they decide at some point enough is enough. If we go into a massive global recession, could china take the trillion in treasuries they have and use that to buy raw materials for their economy?
XBoxBoy
ParticipantSeems to me the question of are bonds a bubble hangs on two issues.
1) Are we headed for inflation or deflation?
2) How long will our foreign creditors continue to buy our debt?If we are headed for a period of steep deflation, then treasuries could be a decent investment. At least they won’t lose nominal value. (As opposed to hard assets or stocks which typically lose value in a deflationary environment.) And given that the Govt. can always print dollars at least you know that you’ll get paid when the time comes. Of course that last point also is the main reason that so many think that deflation isn’t an issue, that inflation is the threat. And given Helicopter Ben’s previous statements that he would never allow deflation to take hold, those arguing that inflation will be the issue have a point. But if I had to pick between inflation and deflation, I’d probably pick neither. Ben and Co. will try to print money as fast as it disappears and not any faster. They might not get it exactly right, and it could certainly be rocky, but they’ll probably be in the ball park.
But personally I think the second question is the ringer. If our foreign creditors continue to buy and hold our debt then even if it is a bubble, it won’t pop, so what do we care if it’s a bubble? Of course if our foreign creditors start to balk at buying all the new debt that the government is going to need to float to cover the costs of these bailouts it’s a different picture. At that point, the government might find itself in a really ugly position.
The obvious problem would be that as people stop buying treasuries and the government continues creating them, the interest rates would skyrocket. (I guess that would qualify as the burst bubble, now wouldn’t it) It certainly would be conceivable that that interest rates would skyrocket, the government would still need to print more money to get the economy back on it’s feet.
But my problem is that I’m not smart enough to know which way these things will go. It took all my mental abilities just to figure out what the parameters of the problem are. So, maybe some of you guys who are knowledgable about this could chime in and inform us. Are we going to see massive deflation, or can Ben and Co fend that off? And always the wild card, what will our foreign investors do? Will they keep buying our bonds? Or will they decide at some point enough is enough. If we go into a massive global recession, could china take the trillion in treasuries they have and use that to buy raw materials for their economy?
XBoxBoy
ParticipantSeems to me the question of are bonds a bubble hangs on two issues.
1) Are we headed for inflation or deflation?
2) How long will our foreign creditors continue to buy our debt?If we are headed for a period of steep deflation, then treasuries could be a decent investment. At least they won’t lose nominal value. (As opposed to hard assets or stocks which typically lose value in a deflationary environment.) And given that the Govt. can always print dollars at least you know that you’ll get paid when the time comes. Of course that last point also is the main reason that so many think that deflation isn’t an issue, that inflation is the threat. And given Helicopter Ben’s previous statements that he would never allow deflation to take hold, those arguing that inflation will be the issue have a point. But if I had to pick between inflation and deflation, I’d probably pick neither. Ben and Co. will try to print money as fast as it disappears and not any faster. They might not get it exactly right, and it could certainly be rocky, but they’ll probably be in the ball park.
But personally I think the second question is the ringer. If our foreign creditors continue to buy and hold our debt then even if it is a bubble, it won’t pop, so what do we care if it’s a bubble? Of course if our foreign creditors start to balk at buying all the new debt that the government is going to need to float to cover the costs of these bailouts it’s a different picture. At that point, the government might find itself in a really ugly position.
The obvious problem would be that as people stop buying treasuries and the government continues creating them, the interest rates would skyrocket. (I guess that would qualify as the burst bubble, now wouldn’t it) It certainly would be conceivable that that interest rates would skyrocket, the government would still need to print more money to get the economy back on it’s feet.
But my problem is that I’m not smart enough to know which way these things will go. It took all my mental abilities just to figure out what the parameters of the problem are. So, maybe some of you guys who are knowledgable about this could chime in and inform us. Are we going to see massive deflation, or can Ben and Co fend that off? And always the wild card, what will our foreign investors do? Will they keep buying our bonds? Or will they decide at some point enough is enough. If we go into a massive global recession, could china take the trillion in treasuries they have and use that to buy raw materials for their economy?
XBoxBoy
ParticipantI have a simple suggestion. Vote no on all of them. There might be one or two that you like, but the problem that I see is that the ballot proposition idea sounds good but in practice is terrible.
All too often there is little unbiased information about these ballot and no information about possible unintended consequences. Many times in recent years voters have been fooled or tricked into voting for things that are not what they think they are.
Many of the propositions are also for large bond issues. Notice that we only get to vote on spending money on the issues that voters are likely to support. (education, environmental protection, police and firefighting) What the state assembly does when they want more money, is spend the general fund on their pet projects and then let these ballot propositions fund the things they should have funded instead of their special interest projects.
So, the sooner we stop trying to run our government through this process the better. Thus, I recommend voting no on all of these issues.
ParticipantI have a simple suggestion. Vote no on all of them. There might be one or two that you like, but the problem that I see is that the ballot proposition idea sounds good but in practice is terrible.
All too often there is little unbiased information about these ballot and no information about possible unintended consequences. Many times in recent years voters have been fooled or tricked into voting for things that are not what they think they are.
Many of the propositions are also for large bond issues. Notice that we only get to vote on spending money on the issues that voters are likely to support. (education, environmental protection, police and firefighting) What the state assembly does when they want more money, is spend the general fund on their pet projects and then let these ballot propositions fund the things they should have funded instead of their special interest projects.
So, the sooner we stop trying to run our government through this process the better. Thus, I recommend voting no on all of these issues.
-
AuthorPosts
