Menu

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,711 through 1,725 (of 2,657 total)
1 2 3 … 114 115 116 … 176 177 178
  • Author
    Posts
  • January 15, 2009 at 9:55 AM in reply to: Best Money Market Rate #329609
    XBoxBoy
    Participant

    bump – hoping more piggy’s will chime in with other alternatives. (Can never have too many choices)

    January 15, 2009 at 9:55 AM in reply to: Best Money Market Rate #329635
    XBoxBoy
    Participant

    bump – hoping more piggy’s will chime in with other alternatives. (Can never have too many choices)

    January 15, 2009 at 9:55 AM in reply to: Best Money Market Rate #329720
    XBoxBoy
    Participant

    bump – hoping more piggy’s will chime in with other alternatives. (Can never have too many choices)

    January 14, 2009 at 3:34 PM in reply to: Pain in La Jolla #328731
    XBoxBoy
    Participant

    Here’s a Blackhorse condo that sold in March 2006 for $2,040,000 and just resold for $1,300,000

    That’s a $740,000 or 36% loss. (Still not counting carrying costs, maintenance, realtor commissions, etc)

    Who says the coast is immune?

    http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-1B4507B8-9703_Keeneland_Row_La_Jolla_CA_92037

    January 14, 2009 at 3:34 PM in reply to: Pain in La Jolla #329067
    XBoxBoy
    Participant

    Here’s a Blackhorse condo that sold in March 2006 for $2,040,000 and just resold for $1,300,000

    That’s a $740,000 or 36% loss. (Still not counting carrying costs, maintenance, realtor commissions, etc)

    Who says the coast is immune?

    http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-1B4507B8-9703_Keeneland_Row_La_Jolla_CA_92037

    January 14, 2009 at 3:34 PM in reply to: Pain in La Jolla #329140
    XBoxBoy
    Participant

    Here’s a Blackhorse condo that sold in March 2006 for $2,040,000 and just resold for $1,300,000

    That’s a $740,000 or 36% loss. (Still not counting carrying costs, maintenance, realtor commissions, etc)

    Who says the coast is immune?

    http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-1B4507B8-9703_Keeneland_Row_La_Jolla_CA_92037

    January 14, 2009 at 3:34 PM in reply to: Pain in La Jolla #329166
    XBoxBoy
    Participant

    Here’s a Blackhorse condo that sold in March 2006 for $2,040,000 and just resold for $1,300,000

    That’s a $740,000 or 36% loss. (Still not counting carrying costs, maintenance, realtor commissions, etc)

    Who says the coast is immune?

    http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-1B4507B8-9703_Keeneland_Row_La_Jolla_CA_92037

    January 14, 2009 at 3:34 PM in reply to: Pain in La Jolla #329249
    XBoxBoy
    Participant

    Here’s a Blackhorse condo that sold in March 2006 for $2,040,000 and just resold for $1,300,000

    That’s a $740,000 or 36% loss. (Still not counting carrying costs, maintenance, realtor commissions, etc)

    Who says the coast is immune?

    http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-1B4507B8-9703_Keeneland_Row_La_Jolla_CA_92037

    January 13, 2009 at 6:54 PM in reply to: Government verses foreclosures #328277
    XBoxBoy
    Participant

    [quote=SD Realtor]Eminent domain allows the government to take an asset where a public purpose is served, and it requires that they pay the investor the “fair market value” for it. NCRC claims the fair market value would be about 30-50 percent of the current loan value.[/quote]

    Someone que the lawyers stage right….

    XBoxBoy

    January 13, 2009 at 6:54 PM in reply to: Government verses foreclosures #328614
    XBoxBoy
    Participant

    [quote=SD Realtor]Eminent domain allows the government to take an asset where a public purpose is served, and it requires that they pay the investor the “fair market value” for it. NCRC claims the fair market value would be about 30-50 percent of the current loan value.[/quote]

    Someone que the lawyers stage right….

    XBoxBoy

    January 13, 2009 at 6:54 PM in reply to: Government verses foreclosures #328685
    XBoxBoy
    Participant

    [quote=SD Realtor]Eminent domain allows the government to take an asset where a public purpose is served, and it requires that they pay the investor the “fair market value” for it. NCRC claims the fair market value would be about 30-50 percent of the current loan value.[/quote]

    Someone que the lawyers stage right….

    XBoxBoy

    January 13, 2009 at 6:54 PM in reply to: Government verses foreclosures #328708
    XBoxBoy
    Participant

    [quote=SD Realtor]Eminent domain allows the government to take an asset where a public purpose is served, and it requires that they pay the investor the “fair market value” for it. NCRC claims the fair market value would be about 30-50 percent of the current loan value.[/quote]

    Someone que the lawyers stage right….

    XBoxBoy

    January 13, 2009 at 6:54 PM in reply to: Government verses foreclosures #328792
    XBoxBoy
    Participant

    [quote=SD Realtor]Eminent domain allows the government to take an asset where a public purpose is served, and it requires that they pay the investor the “fair market value” for it. NCRC claims the fair market value would be about 30-50 percent of the current loan value.[/quote]

    Someone que the lawyers stage right….

    XBoxBoy

    January 10, 2009 at 2:53 PM in reply to: Get in The Game #327242
    XBoxBoy
    Participant

    [quote=peterb]The govt’s going to have to spend at least $20T to hurt the US$. [/quote]

    Care to explain where you got the $20T figure from and what your thinking is on this topic?

    XBoxBoy

    January 10, 2009 at 2:53 PM in reply to: Get in The Game #327261
    XBoxBoy
    Participant

    [quote=peterb]The govt’s going to have to spend at least $20T to hurt the US$. [/quote]

    Care to explain where you got the $20T figure from and what your thinking is on this topic?

    XBoxBoy

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 15 posts - 1,711 through 1,725 (of 2,657 total)
1 2 3 … 114 115 116 … 176 177 178