[urbanrealtor]

[quote=sdrealtor]
BTW, the big name short sale agents that claim to be the best all over TV and the Internet all have abysmal track records.[/quote]

This part is totally true.

Its almost a punchline to a joke.

[urbanrealtor]

[quote=sdrealtor]
BTW, the big name short sale agents that claim to be the best all over TV and the Internet all have abysmal track records.[/quote]

This part is totally true.

Its almost a punchline to a joke.

[urbanrealtor]

[quote=surveyor]To all Barack Obama supporters and voters:

Hope is not a foreign policy.

Hope is not an economic policy.

There were many of us here who told you Obama was incompetent.

There were many of us here who told you Obama was an empty suit.

Unfortunately we have been proven correct.

There are a lot of life-long Democrats who have already figured this out.

No matter how badly Republicans do, these facts remain unchanged or unmitigated.

We told you so we told you so we told you so.

And I say this with no joy or malice in me. Just the facts.[/quote]

While I agree that he is less popular now than previously, I don’t think 8 months of an administration is enough to determine his eventual legacy. I think Kennedy and Reagan and W have proven than. Would you disagree?

[urbanrealtor]

[quote=surveyor]To all Barack Obama supporters and voters:

Hope is not a foreign policy.

Hope is not an economic policy.

There were many of us here who told you Obama was incompetent.

There were many of us here who told you Obama was an empty suit.

Unfortunately we have been proven correct.

There are a lot of life-long Democrats who have already figured this out.

No matter how badly Republicans do, these facts remain unchanged or unmitigated.

We told you so we told you so we told you so.

And I say this with no joy or malice in me. Just the facts.[/quote]

While I agree that he is less popular now than previously, I don’t think 8 months of an administration is enough to determine his eventual legacy. I think Kennedy and Reagan and W have proven than. Would you disagree?

[urbanrealtor]

[quote=surveyor]To all Barack Obama supporters and voters:

Hope is not a foreign policy.

Hope is not an economic policy.

There were many of us here who told you Obama was incompetent.

There were many of us here who told you Obama was an empty suit.

Unfortunately we have been proven correct.

There are a lot of life-long Democrats who have already figured this out.

No matter how badly Republicans do, these facts remain unchanged or unmitigated.

We told you so we told you so we told you so.

And I say this with no joy or malice in me. Just the facts.[/quote]

While I agree that he is less popular now than previously, I don’t think 8 months of an administration is enough to determine his eventual legacy. I think Kennedy and Reagan and W have proven than. Would you disagree?

[urbanrealtor]

[quote=surveyor]To all Barack Obama supporters and voters:

Hope is not a foreign policy.

Hope is not an economic policy.

There were many of us here who told you Obama was incompetent.

There were many of us here who told you Obama was an empty suit.

Unfortunately we have been proven correct.

There are a lot of life-long Democrats who have already figured this out.

No matter how badly Republicans do, these facts remain unchanged or unmitigated.

We told you so we told you so we told you so.

And I say this with no joy or malice in me. Just the facts.[/quote]

While I agree that he is less popular now than previously, I don’t think 8 months of an administration is enough to determine his eventual legacy. I think Kennedy and Reagan and W have proven than. Would you disagree?

[urbanrealtor]

[quote=surveyor]To all Barack Obama supporters and voters:

Hope is not a foreign policy.

Hope is not an economic policy.

There were many of us here who told you Obama was incompetent.

There were many of us here who told you Obama was an empty suit.

Unfortunately we have been proven correct.

There are a lot of life-long Democrats who have already figured this out.

No matter how badly Republicans do, these facts remain unchanged or unmitigated.

We told you so we told you so we told you so.

And I say this with no joy or malice in me. Just the facts.[/quote]

While I agree that he is less popular now than previously, I don’t think 8 months of an administration is enough to determine his eventual legacy. I think Kennedy and Reagan and W have proven than. Would you disagree?

[urbanrealtor]

I was referring to Marx’s shift away from ideas and into material concerns.

And again, I really think this comes down to poor power sharing.

This is why the old English government always had an almost innate advantage over the pre-revolutionary French government.

Accretion of power is not the monster. Poor management is the monster. I think that is as true of the terror or the inquisition, as it is of Weimar.

Put differently, I don’t believe in evil. Just incompetence.

I think those labels just muddy it up.

[urbanrealtor]

I was referring to Marx’s shift away from ideas and into material concerns.

And again, I really think this comes down to poor power sharing.

This is why the old English government always had an almost innate advantage over the pre-revolutionary French government.

Accretion of power is not the monster. Poor management is the monster. I think that is as true of the terror or the inquisition, as it is of Weimar.

Put differently, I don’t believe in evil. Just incompetence.

I think those labels just muddy it up.

[urbanrealtor]

I was referring to Marx’s shift away from ideas and into material concerns.

And again, I really think this comes down to poor power sharing.

This is why the old English government always had an almost innate advantage over the pre-revolutionary French government.

Accretion of power is not the monster. Poor management is the monster. I think that is as true of the terror or the inquisition, as it is of Weimar.

Put differently, I don’t believe in evil. Just incompetence.

I think those labels just muddy it up.

[urbanrealtor]

I was referring to Marx’s shift away from ideas and into material concerns.

And again, I really think this comes down to poor power sharing.

This is why the old English government always had an almost innate advantage over the pre-revolutionary French government.

Accretion of power is not the monster. Poor management is the monster. I think that is as true of the terror or the inquisition, as it is of Weimar.

Put differently, I don’t believe in evil. Just incompetence.

I think those labels just muddy it up.

[urbanrealtor]

I was referring to Marx’s shift away from ideas and into material concerns.

And again, I really think this comes down to poor power sharing.

This is why the old English government always had an almost innate advantage over the pre-revolutionary French government.

Accretion of power is not the monster. Poor management is the monster. I think that is as true of the terror or the inquisition, as it is of Weimar.

Put differently, I don’t believe in evil. Just incompetence.

I think those labels just muddy it up.

[urbanrealtor]

Barf.

I think trying to boil down homicidal megalomania into a question of materialist dialectics is a stupid endeavor.

Killing lots of people has a lot more to it than economic policy.

If it were all about government supervision of property and the means of production then I think we would have seen a Swedish or Indian Pol Pot.

I really think its more about naive allocation of power sharing systems.

And thats not the malt liquor talking.

[urbanrealtor]

Barf.

I think trying to boil down homicidal megalomania into a question of materialist dialectics is a stupid endeavor.

Killing lots of people has a lot more to it than economic policy.

If it were all about government supervision of property and the means of production then I think we would have seen a Swedish or Indian Pol Pot.

I really think its more about naive allocation of power sharing systems.

And thats not the malt liquor talking.

[urbanrealtor]

Barf.

I think trying to boil down homicidal megalomania into a question of materialist dialectics is a stupid endeavor.

Killing lots of people has a lot more to it than economic policy.

If it were all about government supervision of property and the means of production then I think we would have seen a Swedish or Indian Pol Pot.

I really think its more about naive allocation of power sharing systems.

And thats not the malt liquor talking.

[Author]

Posts