Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
urbanrealtor
Participant[quote=Rich Toscano]My theory is that instead of posting on pigg, urbanrealtor has been watching this over and over:
A giant shark that eats jumbo jets out of the air… vs Debbie Gibson![/quote]
That is so awesome I don’t even know where to begin.It has octopi, giant sharks, and Lorenzo Lamas.
I just had a nerdgasm.
Participant[quote=EconProf]We are all unduly afraid of asbestos due to a cabal of trial lawyers, abatement contractors, junk science, and bureaucrats. Real danger comes only from prolonged exposure to high concentrations of airborne asbestoes, such as that suffered decades later by shipyard workers in WW II.
Still, if they discovered it, current rules call for us to be overly safe–damn the cost–and contain it.
As to your higher utility costs when they use power tools to do the repairs, you are really talking about pennies here. Worry more about who is going to pay, and how your life and possessions will be disrupted during the work.[/quote]And cigarettes kill less than a third of long term smokers.
At least your Ayn Rand level of credibility stays consistent.Participant[quote=EconProf]We are all unduly afraid of asbestos due to a cabal of trial lawyers, abatement contractors, junk science, and bureaucrats. Real danger comes only from prolonged exposure to high concentrations of airborne asbestoes, such as that suffered decades later by shipyard workers in WW II.
Still, if they discovered it, current rules call for us to be overly safe–damn the cost–and contain it.
As to your higher utility costs when they use power tools to do the repairs, you are really talking about pennies here. Worry more about who is going to pay, and how your life and possessions will be disrupted during the work.[/quote]And cigarettes kill less than a third of long term smokers.
At least your Ayn Rand level of credibility stays consistent.Participant[quote=EconProf]We are all unduly afraid of asbestos due to a cabal of trial lawyers, abatement contractors, junk science, and bureaucrats. Real danger comes only from prolonged exposure to high concentrations of airborne asbestoes, such as that suffered decades later by shipyard workers in WW II.
Still, if they discovered it, current rules call for us to be overly safe–damn the cost–and contain it.
As to your higher utility costs when they use power tools to do the repairs, you are really talking about pennies here. Worry more about who is going to pay, and how your life and possessions will be disrupted during the work.[/quote]And cigarettes kill less than a third of long term smokers.
At least your Ayn Rand level of credibility stays consistent.Participant[quote=EconProf]We are all unduly afraid of asbestos due to a cabal of trial lawyers, abatement contractors, junk science, and bureaucrats. Real danger comes only from prolonged exposure to high concentrations of airborne asbestoes, such as that suffered decades later by shipyard workers in WW II.
Still, if they discovered it, current rules call for us to be overly safe–damn the cost–and contain it.
As to your higher utility costs when they use power tools to do the repairs, you are really talking about pennies here. Worry more about who is going to pay, and how your life and possessions will be disrupted during the work.[/quote]And cigarettes kill less than a third of long term smokers.
At least your Ayn Rand level of credibility stays consistent.Participant[quote=EconProf]We are all unduly afraid of asbestos due to a cabal of trial lawyers, abatement contractors, junk science, and bureaucrats. Real danger comes only from prolonged exposure to high concentrations of airborne asbestoes, such as that suffered decades later by shipyard workers in WW II.
Still, if they discovered it, current rules call for us to be overly safe–damn the cost–and contain it.
As to your higher utility costs when they use power tools to do the repairs, you are really talking about pennies here. Worry more about who is going to pay, and how your life and possessions will be disrupted during the work.[/quote]And cigarettes kill less than a third of long term smokers.
At least your Ayn Rand level of credibility stays consistent.ParticipantGoddam liberal sharks.
1: shark teeth are not actually affixed to the jaw
ParticipantGoddam liberal sharks.
1: shark teeth are not actually affixed to the jaw
ParticipantGoddam liberal sharks.
1: shark teeth are not actually affixed to the jaw
ParticipantGoddam liberal sharks.
1: shark teeth are not actually affixed to the jaw
ParticipantGoddam liberal sharks.
1: shark teeth are not actually affixed to the jaw
Participant[quote=jpinpb]Maybe I’m the only one that thinks this, but I think under 500k is appealing to a greater populus in San Diego, hence more competition. I have noticed higher than 650k, properties have less offers and are on the market for much longer. I’m speaking of just the ZIPs I’m watching in this regard.
I personally can deal w/that particular small house only b/c the lot was so big and expansive and private that it didn’t seem as claustrophobic. I can always put a shed back there and store things. But the extra bath was really the deal breaker. For that price, I wanted that extra bath. So by the time I added the bath, it just didn’t make sense at that price for me.
I’m over it. I have seen other things that people are justified in crying over the loss and this isn’t it.[/quote]
The 500k mark is major point of cleavage in the way people buy.
You are totally right.Participant[quote=jpinpb]Maybe I’m the only one that thinks this, but I think under 500k is appealing to a greater populus in San Diego, hence more competition. I have noticed higher than 650k, properties have less offers and are on the market for much longer. I’m speaking of just the ZIPs I’m watching in this regard.
I personally can deal w/that particular small house only b/c the lot was so big and expansive and private that it didn’t seem as claustrophobic. I can always put a shed back there and store things. But the extra bath was really the deal breaker. For that price, I wanted that extra bath. So by the time I added the bath, it just didn’t make sense at that price for me.
I’m over it. I have seen other things that people are justified in crying over the loss and this isn’t it.[/quote]
The 500k mark is major point of cleavage in the way people buy.
You are totally right.Participant[quote=jpinpb]Maybe I’m the only one that thinks this, but I think under 500k is appealing to a greater populus in San Diego, hence more competition. I have noticed higher than 650k, properties have less offers and are on the market for much longer. I’m speaking of just the ZIPs I’m watching in this regard.
I personally can deal w/that particular small house only b/c the lot was so big and expansive and private that it didn’t seem as claustrophobic. I can always put a shed back there and store things. But the extra bath was really the deal breaker. For that price, I wanted that extra bath. So by the time I added the bath, it just didn’t make sense at that price for me.
I’m over it. I have seen other things that people are justified in crying over the loss and this isn’t it.[/quote]
The 500k mark is major point of cleavage in the way people buy.
You are totally right. -
AuthorPosts
