Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
UCGal
Participant[quote=carlsbadworker][quote=walterwhite]In the long term, we are all dead.[/quote]
Unless you become a vampire.[/quote]
But what’s the point of living in Coastal California if you can only go to the beach at night? LOLParticipant[quote=carlsbadworker][quote=walterwhite]In the long term, we are all dead.[/quote]
Unless you become a vampire.[/quote]
But what’s the point of living in Coastal California if you can only go to the beach at night? LOLParticipantI agree – not an arms length transaction – same last name for all parties.
Looks like parents selling to a child.
Nothing funny about it. At least to me… since I bought from my parents.
I should have upgraded my parents… it’s a great deal for the son/daughter in law. LOL
Not valid to use for comps, obviously.
ParticipantI agree – not an arms length transaction – same last name for all parties.
Looks like parents selling to a child.
Nothing funny about it. At least to me… since I bought from my parents.
I should have upgraded my parents… it’s a great deal for the son/daughter in law. LOL
Not valid to use for comps, obviously.
ParticipantI agree – not an arms length transaction – same last name for all parties.
Looks like parents selling to a child.
Nothing funny about it. At least to me… since I bought from my parents.
I should have upgraded my parents… it’s a great deal for the son/daughter in law. LOL
Not valid to use for comps, obviously.
ParticipantI agree – not an arms length transaction – same last name for all parties.
Looks like parents selling to a child.
Nothing funny about it. At least to me… since I bought from my parents.
I should have upgraded my parents… it’s a great deal for the son/daughter in law. LOL
Not valid to use for comps, obviously.
ParticipantI agree – not an arms length transaction – same last name for all parties.
Looks like parents selling to a child.
Nothing funny about it. At least to me… since I bought from my parents.
I should have upgraded my parents… it’s a great deal for the son/daughter in law. LOL
Not valid to use for comps, obviously.
ParticipantI was a student in San Diego unified when the busing was going on. San Diego did NOT have forced busing. They were able to achieve their numbers with volunteer busing and magnet schools.
My junior high (before they called it a middle school) and high school had kids bused in.
There was some racial tension… but this was the 70’s – we students did a sit-in to get the administration to help deal with it. LOL. (I’ll admit – for many it was an excuse to ditch a class to do the sit-in.)
I don’t know of ANY parents that pulled their kids when the voluntary busing started. And UC was pretty affluent. Very few of my friends went to private school. One friend went to a magnet school – for the performing arts. This was before UC high and Standley middle – UC kids went to Marston and Clairemont.
There’s a reason magnet schools in San Diego unified are often in less desirable neighborhoods – it’s a way of drawing the white kids from the neighborhood schools to the more inner city neighorhoods – look at what used to be San Diego High (near downtown), south end of Balboa Park. It was a pretty poor performing school, very inner city in it’s demographics – now it’s a cluster of magnet schools – schools within the larger campus. And it draws from all over the district For the leadership school, the arts school, the business school, international studies. The demographics changed with the magnet programs.
http://www.sandi.net/20451072011457293/blank/browse.asp?a=383&BMDRN=2000&BCOB=0&c=66267ParticipantI was a student in San Diego unified when the busing was going on. San Diego did NOT have forced busing. They were able to achieve their numbers with volunteer busing and magnet schools.
My junior high (before they called it a middle school) and high school had kids bused in.
There was some racial tension… but this was the 70’s – we students did a sit-in to get the administration to help deal with it. LOL. (I’ll admit – for many it was an excuse to ditch a class to do the sit-in.)
I don’t know of ANY parents that pulled their kids when the voluntary busing started. And UC was pretty affluent. Very few of my friends went to private school. One friend went to a magnet school – for the performing arts. This was before UC high and Standley middle – UC kids went to Marston and Clairemont.
There’s a reason magnet schools in San Diego unified are often in less desirable neighborhoods – it’s a way of drawing the white kids from the neighborhood schools to the more inner city neighorhoods – look at what used to be San Diego High (near downtown), south end of Balboa Park. It was a pretty poor performing school, very inner city in it’s demographics – now it’s a cluster of magnet schools – schools within the larger campus. And it draws from all over the district For the leadership school, the arts school, the business school, international studies. The demographics changed with the magnet programs.
http://www.sandi.net/20451072011457293/blank/browse.asp?a=383&BMDRN=2000&BCOB=0&c=66267ParticipantI was a student in San Diego unified when the busing was going on. San Diego did NOT have forced busing. They were able to achieve their numbers with volunteer busing and magnet schools.
My junior high (before they called it a middle school) and high school had kids bused in.
There was some racial tension… but this was the 70’s – we students did a sit-in to get the administration to help deal with it. LOL. (I’ll admit – for many it was an excuse to ditch a class to do the sit-in.)
I don’t know of ANY parents that pulled their kids when the voluntary busing started. And UC was pretty affluent. Very few of my friends went to private school. One friend went to a magnet school – for the performing arts. This was before UC high and Standley middle – UC kids went to Marston and Clairemont.
There’s a reason magnet schools in San Diego unified are often in less desirable neighborhoods – it’s a way of drawing the white kids from the neighborhood schools to the more inner city neighorhoods – look at what used to be San Diego High (near downtown), south end of Balboa Park. It was a pretty poor performing school, very inner city in it’s demographics – now it’s a cluster of magnet schools – schools within the larger campus. And it draws from all over the district For the leadership school, the arts school, the business school, international studies. The demographics changed with the magnet programs.
http://www.sandi.net/20451072011457293/blank/browse.asp?a=383&BMDRN=2000&BCOB=0&c=66267ParticipantI was a student in San Diego unified when the busing was going on. San Diego did NOT have forced busing. They were able to achieve their numbers with volunteer busing and magnet schools.
My junior high (before they called it a middle school) and high school had kids bused in.
There was some racial tension… but this was the 70’s – we students did a sit-in to get the administration to help deal with it. LOL. (I’ll admit – for many it was an excuse to ditch a class to do the sit-in.)
I don’t know of ANY parents that pulled their kids when the voluntary busing started. And UC was pretty affluent. Very few of my friends went to private school. One friend went to a magnet school – for the performing arts. This was before UC high and Standley middle – UC kids went to Marston and Clairemont.
There’s a reason magnet schools in San Diego unified are often in less desirable neighborhoods – it’s a way of drawing the white kids from the neighborhood schools to the more inner city neighorhoods – look at what used to be San Diego High (near downtown), south end of Balboa Park. It was a pretty poor performing school, very inner city in it’s demographics – now it’s a cluster of magnet schools – schools within the larger campus. And it draws from all over the district For the leadership school, the arts school, the business school, international studies. The demographics changed with the magnet programs.
http://www.sandi.net/20451072011457293/blank/browse.asp?a=383&BMDRN=2000&BCOB=0&c=66267ParticipantI was a student in San Diego unified when the busing was going on. San Diego did NOT have forced busing. They were able to achieve their numbers with volunteer busing and magnet schools.
My junior high (before they called it a middle school) and high school had kids bused in.
There was some racial tension… but this was the 70’s – we students did a sit-in to get the administration to help deal with it. LOL. (I’ll admit – for many it was an excuse to ditch a class to do the sit-in.)
I don’t know of ANY parents that pulled their kids when the voluntary busing started. And UC was pretty affluent. Very few of my friends went to private school. One friend went to a magnet school – for the performing arts. This was before UC high and Standley middle – UC kids went to Marston and Clairemont.
There’s a reason magnet schools in San Diego unified are often in less desirable neighborhoods – it’s a way of drawing the white kids from the neighborhood schools to the more inner city neighorhoods – look at what used to be San Diego High (near downtown), south end of Balboa Park. It was a pretty poor performing school, very inner city in it’s demographics – now it’s a cluster of magnet schools – schools within the larger campus. And it draws from all over the district For the leadership school, the arts school, the business school, international studies. The demographics changed with the magnet programs.
http://www.sandi.net/20451072011457293/blank/browse.asp?a=383&BMDRN=2000&BCOB=0&c=66267Participant[quote=Jazzman]I’ve seen a chart that purports to show the same, but with NY being the biggest draw. What can you buy in California for $100k? Why would foreigners give “It’s a nice place to live” as the main reason, when they legally can’t live here? Needs some verbal backup.[/quote]
So many assumptions here…
* you can buy condos and even SFR in California for less than 100k in plenty of non coastal, non big city locations. I did a quick search of big bear and found several under 100k
* If they live in it seasonally, for three months, then nice place to live matters. Think snow birds from Canada. You can live in the US for 90 days on a tourist visa. My aunt’s community in Arizona is 70% seasonal Snowbirds, mostly Canadians, but some from Northern US states,
like the Dakotas.If you look at the link… most of the foreign buyers are from North America and that means Canada and Mexico.
Participant[quote=Jazzman]I’ve seen a chart that purports to show the same, but with NY being the biggest draw. What can you buy in California for $100k? Why would foreigners give “It’s a nice place to live” as the main reason, when they legally can’t live here? Needs some verbal backup.[/quote]
So many assumptions here…
* you can buy condos and even SFR in California for less than 100k in plenty of non coastal, non big city locations. I did a quick search of big bear and found several under 100k
* If they live in it seasonally, for three months, then nice place to live matters. Think snow birds from Canada. You can live in the US for 90 days on a tourist visa. My aunt’s community in Arizona is 70% seasonal Snowbirds, mostly Canadians, but some from Northern US states,
like the Dakotas.If you look at the link… most of the foreign buyers are from North America and that means Canada and Mexico.
-
AuthorPosts
