Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
UCGal
ParticipantMy opinion.
She needs a serious psych eval. I don’t think she’s mentally stable.
I also would like to see the doctor that implanted 8 embryos to be prosecuted or sued for the medical costs associated with the premie’s hospital stay.
I don’t blame the babies. But the woman is wacko!
UCGal
ParticipantMy opinion.
She needs a serious psych eval. I don’t think she’s mentally stable.
I also would like to see the doctor that implanted 8 embryos to be prosecuted or sued for the medical costs associated with the premie’s hospital stay.
I don’t blame the babies. But the woman is wacko!
February 12, 2009 at 11:40 AM in reply to: Stimulus Watch: San Diego, California & the rest of the states #345121UCGal
ParticipantThanks for the link.
The titles of the projects are very confusing. One caught my eye because it will likely affect my ‘hood – University City…
http://www.stimuluswatch.org/project/view/15539
“Regents Rd Widening from Genesee”I’m trying to figure this one out – is this a North UC (aka as UTC) project… So over by Scripps hospital and UCSD’s cancer hospital, behind the Jewish community center…
or is it something to do with the bridge that has been fought for so long.
(for the record – I’m for the bridge… The whole area was developed with the bridge as part of the traffic flow… Since I was a child, literally.)Or is it south UC – which doesn’t make sense since Regents and Gennesee are parallel in South UC.
I wish there were a place to get details on what these projects are.
February 12, 2009 at 11:40 AM in reply to: Stimulus Watch: San Diego, California & the rest of the states #345447UCGal
ParticipantThanks for the link.
The titles of the projects are very confusing. One caught my eye because it will likely affect my ‘hood – University City…
http://www.stimuluswatch.org/project/view/15539
“Regents Rd Widening from Genesee”I’m trying to figure this one out – is this a North UC (aka as UTC) project… So over by Scripps hospital and UCSD’s cancer hospital, behind the Jewish community center…
or is it something to do with the bridge that has been fought for so long.
(for the record – I’m for the bridge… The whole area was developed with the bridge as part of the traffic flow… Since I was a child, literally.)Or is it south UC – which doesn’t make sense since Regents and Gennesee are parallel in South UC.
I wish there were a place to get details on what these projects are.
February 12, 2009 at 11:40 AM in reply to: Stimulus Watch: San Diego, California & the rest of the states #345554UCGal
ParticipantThanks for the link.
The titles of the projects are very confusing. One caught my eye because it will likely affect my ‘hood – University City…
http://www.stimuluswatch.org/project/view/15539
“Regents Rd Widening from Genesee”I’m trying to figure this one out – is this a North UC (aka as UTC) project… So over by Scripps hospital and UCSD’s cancer hospital, behind the Jewish community center…
or is it something to do with the bridge that has been fought for so long.
(for the record – I’m for the bridge… The whole area was developed with the bridge as part of the traffic flow… Since I was a child, literally.)Or is it south UC – which doesn’t make sense since Regents and Gennesee are parallel in South UC.
I wish there were a place to get details on what these projects are.
February 12, 2009 at 11:40 AM in reply to: Stimulus Watch: San Diego, California & the rest of the states #345588UCGal
ParticipantThanks for the link.
The titles of the projects are very confusing. One caught my eye because it will likely affect my ‘hood – University City…
http://www.stimuluswatch.org/project/view/15539
“Regents Rd Widening from Genesee”I’m trying to figure this one out – is this a North UC (aka as UTC) project… So over by Scripps hospital and UCSD’s cancer hospital, behind the Jewish community center…
or is it something to do with the bridge that has been fought for so long.
(for the record – I’m for the bridge… The whole area was developed with the bridge as part of the traffic flow… Since I was a child, literally.)Or is it south UC – which doesn’t make sense since Regents and Gennesee are parallel in South UC.
I wish there were a place to get details on what these projects are.
February 12, 2009 at 11:40 AM in reply to: Stimulus Watch: San Diego, California & the rest of the states #345685UCGal
ParticipantThanks for the link.
The titles of the projects are very confusing. One caught my eye because it will likely affect my ‘hood – University City…
http://www.stimuluswatch.org/project/view/15539
“Regents Rd Widening from Genesee”I’m trying to figure this one out – is this a North UC (aka as UTC) project… So over by Scripps hospital and UCSD’s cancer hospital, behind the Jewish community center…
or is it something to do with the bridge that has been fought for so long.
(for the record – I’m for the bridge… The whole area was developed with the bridge as part of the traffic flow… Since I was a child, literally.)Or is it south UC – which doesn’t make sense since Regents and Gennesee are parallel in South UC.
I wish there were a place to get details on what these projects are.
February 12, 2009 at 11:30 AM in reply to: Senate OKs $15,000 tax break for homebuyers – I believe investors too eligible for this tax credit #345116UCGal
ParticipantIt looks like this $15k tax credit provision is a lot smaller after the conference committee negotiations.
From Bloomberg, via Calculated risk.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aeJYLHy8kV1U
A proposed $15,000 tax credit for homebuyers was reduced to $8,000, Baucus said.
February 12, 2009 at 11:30 AM in reply to: Senate OKs $15,000 tax break for homebuyers – I believe investors too eligible for this tax credit #345442UCGal
ParticipantIt looks like this $15k tax credit provision is a lot smaller after the conference committee negotiations.
From Bloomberg, via Calculated risk.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aeJYLHy8kV1U
A proposed $15,000 tax credit for homebuyers was reduced to $8,000, Baucus said.
February 12, 2009 at 11:30 AM in reply to: Senate OKs $15,000 tax break for homebuyers – I believe investors too eligible for this tax credit #345549UCGal
ParticipantIt looks like this $15k tax credit provision is a lot smaller after the conference committee negotiations.
From Bloomberg, via Calculated risk.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aeJYLHy8kV1U
A proposed $15,000 tax credit for homebuyers was reduced to $8,000, Baucus said.
February 12, 2009 at 11:30 AM in reply to: Senate OKs $15,000 tax break for homebuyers – I believe investors too eligible for this tax credit #345582UCGal
ParticipantIt looks like this $15k tax credit provision is a lot smaller after the conference committee negotiations.
From Bloomberg, via Calculated risk.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aeJYLHy8kV1U
A proposed $15,000 tax credit for homebuyers was reduced to $8,000, Baucus said.
February 12, 2009 at 11:30 AM in reply to: Senate OKs $15,000 tax break for homebuyers – I believe investors too eligible for this tax credit #345680UCGal
ParticipantIt looks like this $15k tax credit provision is a lot smaller after the conference committee negotiations.
From Bloomberg, via Calculated risk.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aeJYLHy8kV1U
A proposed $15,000 tax credit for homebuyers was reduced to $8,000, Baucus said.
UCGal
ParticipantDidn’t our economic problems largely stem from people borrowing too much money? Spending money they didn’t have?
Am I missing something?
Whatever happened to living within ones’ means and saving/investing what was left over. You’re talking about borrowing to invest.
The only difference I see between this plan and people who bought houses they couldn’t/shouldn’t have bought is you’re talking about commodities not real estate… but you’re still making the assumption that commodities can only go up. And using borrowed money for that assumption.
UCGal
ParticipantDidn’t our economic problems largely stem from people borrowing too much money? Spending money they didn’t have?
Am I missing something?
Whatever happened to living within ones’ means and saving/investing what was left over. You’re talking about borrowing to invest.
The only difference I see between this plan and people who bought houses they couldn’t/shouldn’t have bought is you’re talking about commodities not real estate… but you’re still making the assumption that commodities can only go up. And using borrowed money for that assumption.
-
AuthorPosts
