Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 10, 2009 at 4:33 PM in reply to: San Diego Unified SD: Trustee spearheads idea to divide school district #413813June 10, 2009 at 4:33 PM in reply to: San Diego Unified SD: Trustee spearheads idea to divide school district #413882
UCGal
Participant[quote=David J]Not sure if it is a good idea or not, but it is a bit suspicious that Scripps Ranch would be welcome to be part of the San Diego Coastal Unified School District. I guess it would depend on where I lived if I would be for it or against it.[/quote]
That jumped out at me, too.
And I think the point about breaking up the district so that LJHS doesn’t get as many NCLB kids is valid. Top rated schools are obviously choices for kids who’s schools flunk No-Child-Left-Behind. And I’m pretty sure that kids from failed schools jump to the front of the “choice” list.
June 10, 2009 at 4:33 PM in reply to: San Diego Unified SD: Trustee spearheads idea to divide school district #414033Participant[quote=David J]Not sure if it is a good idea or not, but it is a bit suspicious that Scripps Ranch would be welcome to be part of the San Diego Coastal Unified School District. I guess it would depend on where I lived if I would be for it or against it.[/quote]
That jumped out at me, too.
And I think the point about breaking up the district so that LJHS doesn’t get as many NCLB kids is valid. Top rated schools are obviously choices for kids who’s schools flunk No-Child-Left-Behind. And I’m pretty sure that kids from failed schools jump to the front of the “choice” list.
June 10, 2009 at 4:28 PM in reply to: The plot thickens….Confirmed.. Fed Reserve Strongarmed BofA … #413320ParticipantI wonder how Hank, Timmy, and Ben sleep at night.
June 10, 2009 at 4:28 PM in reply to: The plot thickens….Confirmed.. Fed Reserve Strongarmed BofA … #413552ParticipantI wonder how Hank, Timmy, and Ben sleep at night.
June 10, 2009 at 4:28 PM in reply to: The plot thickens….Confirmed.. Fed Reserve Strongarmed BofA … #413803ParticipantI wonder how Hank, Timmy, and Ben sleep at night.
June 10, 2009 at 4:28 PM in reply to: The plot thickens….Confirmed.. Fed Reserve Strongarmed BofA … #413873ParticipantI wonder how Hank, Timmy, and Ben sleep at night.
June 10, 2009 at 4:28 PM in reply to: The plot thickens….Confirmed.. Fed Reserve Strongarmed BofA … #414023ParticipantI wonder how Hank, Timmy, and Ben sleep at night.
Participant[quote=Rt.66]Her point is very relevant because they NEED to steal a SS# in order to move about as a citizen, so they do, and its a big problem.
[/quote]Question to the wise folks here…
The IRS must see a lot of SS#’s where multiple jobs are paying taxes – one income stream from the legitimate owner of the #, one income stream from the stolen SS# user. I assume the IRS does not pursue this because the US government needs/wants the tax income from illegals who have taxes deducted by their employers. In other words – is the government *choosing* not to pursue this enforcement because they count on the extra tax revenues?
I would think, if the government *wanted* to crack down on illegals who are using made up or stolen SS#’s – they could write a program pretty easily to look for disparate geographical wages on the same SS#.
But what do I know.
Participant[quote=Rt.66]Her point is very relevant because they NEED to steal a SS# in order to move about as a citizen, so they do, and its a big problem.
[/quote]Question to the wise folks here…
The IRS must see a lot of SS#’s where multiple jobs are paying taxes – one income stream from the legitimate owner of the #, one income stream from the stolen SS# user. I assume the IRS does not pursue this because the US government needs/wants the tax income from illegals who have taxes deducted by their employers. In other words – is the government *choosing* not to pursue this enforcement because they count on the extra tax revenues?
I would think, if the government *wanted* to crack down on illegals who are using made up or stolen SS#’s – they could write a program pretty easily to look for disparate geographical wages on the same SS#.
But what do I know.
Participant[quote=Rt.66]Her point is very relevant because they NEED to steal a SS# in order to move about as a citizen, so they do, and its a big problem.
[/quote]Question to the wise folks here…
The IRS must see a lot of SS#’s where multiple jobs are paying taxes – one income stream from the legitimate owner of the #, one income stream from the stolen SS# user. I assume the IRS does not pursue this because the US government needs/wants the tax income from illegals who have taxes deducted by their employers. In other words – is the government *choosing* not to pursue this enforcement because they count on the extra tax revenues?
I would think, if the government *wanted* to crack down on illegals who are using made up or stolen SS#’s – they could write a program pretty easily to look for disparate geographical wages on the same SS#.
But what do I know.
Participant[quote=Rt.66]Her point is very relevant because they NEED to steal a SS# in order to move about as a citizen, so they do, and its a big problem.
[/quote]Question to the wise folks here…
The IRS must see a lot of SS#’s where multiple jobs are paying taxes – one income stream from the legitimate owner of the #, one income stream from the stolen SS# user. I assume the IRS does not pursue this because the US government needs/wants the tax income from illegals who have taxes deducted by their employers. In other words – is the government *choosing* not to pursue this enforcement because they count on the extra tax revenues?
I would think, if the government *wanted* to crack down on illegals who are using made up or stolen SS#’s – they could write a program pretty easily to look for disparate geographical wages on the same SS#.
But what do I know.
Participant[quote=Rt.66]Her point is very relevant because they NEED to steal a SS# in order to move about as a citizen, so they do, and its a big problem.
[/quote]Question to the wise folks here…
The IRS must see a lot of SS#’s where multiple jobs are paying taxes – one income stream from the legitimate owner of the #, one income stream from the stolen SS# user. I assume the IRS does not pursue this because the US government needs/wants the tax income from illegals who have taxes deducted by their employers. In other words – is the government *choosing* not to pursue this enforcement because they count on the extra tax revenues?
I would think, if the government *wanted* to crack down on illegals who are using made up or stolen SS#’s – they could write a program pretty easily to look for disparate geographical wages on the same SS#.
But what do I know.
Participant[quote=sunny88]Has anybody seen one of these condos before? Any comments? I’m interested in buying it.
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-080077120-3520_Lebon_Dr_5323_San_Diego_CA_92122%5B/quote%5D
It would help if they had a picture of the actual unit rather than just the common areas. And why did they raise the price?
Participant[quote=sunny88]Has anybody seen one of these condos before? Any comments? I’m interested in buying it.
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-080077120-3520_Lebon_Dr_5323_San_Diego_CA_92122%5B/quote%5D
It would help if they had a picture of the actual unit rather than just the common areas. And why did they raise the price?
-
AuthorPosts
