Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
UCGal
ParticipantJust saw the episode today.
Looks like Paul and JD are living in it. Tax roles show it’s owned by Esajian, LLC. At the end they point to another house (guessing it’s 1114 Emerald) and apparently Than and his wife moved there.
You knew the whole show was a setup… It starts out with Than in a helocopter over the coast talking about how they won’t be doing any projects at the beach – but other parts of the county are getting affordable… and then the project is at the beach.
ParticipantJust saw the episode today.
Looks like Paul and JD are living in it. Tax roles show it’s owned by Esajian, LLC. At the end they point to another house (guessing it’s 1114 Emerald) and apparently Than and his wife moved there.
You knew the whole show was a setup… It starts out with Than in a helocopter over the coast talking about how they won’t be doing any projects at the beach – but other parts of the county are getting affordable… and then the project is at the beach.
August 8, 2009 at 4:14 PM in reply to: Have you ever considered installing artificial grass? #442538ParticipantWe’ve seriously looked at it. A few of our neighbors have done it… Observing theirs – some are more realistic than others.
Some are artifically turfs are made locally some are made further afield – which reduces the “environmentally friendly” factor when you look at the carbon footprint of shipping it to the US.
We’re looking at a combination with zeroscaping… where the fake grass is a small portion of the landscaping… I’ve noticed that it looks more realistic when you do that.
August 8, 2009 at 4:14 PM in reply to: Have you ever considered installing artificial grass? #442734ParticipantWe’ve seriously looked at it. A few of our neighbors have done it… Observing theirs – some are more realistic than others.
Some are artifically turfs are made locally some are made further afield – which reduces the “environmentally friendly” factor when you look at the carbon footprint of shipping it to the US.
We’re looking at a combination with zeroscaping… where the fake grass is a small portion of the landscaping… I’ve noticed that it looks more realistic when you do that.
August 8, 2009 at 4:14 PM in reply to: Have you ever considered installing artificial grass? #443071ParticipantWe’ve seriously looked at it. A few of our neighbors have done it… Observing theirs – some are more realistic than others.
Some are artifically turfs are made locally some are made further afield – which reduces the “environmentally friendly” factor when you look at the carbon footprint of shipping it to the US.
We’re looking at a combination with zeroscaping… where the fake grass is a small portion of the landscaping… I’ve noticed that it looks more realistic when you do that.
August 8, 2009 at 4:14 PM in reply to: Have you ever considered installing artificial grass? #443140ParticipantWe’ve seriously looked at it. A few of our neighbors have done it… Observing theirs – some are more realistic than others.
Some are artifically turfs are made locally some are made further afield – which reduces the “environmentally friendly” factor when you look at the carbon footprint of shipping it to the US.
We’re looking at a combination with zeroscaping… where the fake grass is a small portion of the landscaping… I’ve noticed that it looks more realistic when you do that.
August 8, 2009 at 4:14 PM in reply to: Have you ever considered installing artificial grass? #443318ParticipantWe’ve seriously looked at it. A few of our neighbors have done it… Observing theirs – some are more realistic than others.
Some are artifically turfs are made locally some are made further afield – which reduces the “environmentally friendly” factor when you look at the carbon footprint of shipping it to the US.
We’re looking at a combination with zeroscaping… where the fake grass is a small portion of the landscaping… I’ve noticed that it looks more realistic when you do that.
ParticipantJust for the record… It was a Florida Republican who added the funding. Dem’s are objecting.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124969431303416161.html
Some lawmakers say they often know more about what the military needs than the executive branch does.
“The Pentagon is not the fountain of all knowledge,” said Rep. Bill Young, a Florida Republican who was senior appropriator on the House floor last month when the Pentagon spending bill was approved. “They don’t have all of the knowledge, and they don’t have all of the wisdom. Neither does the administration, neither does the Congress. That’s why we work together.”
(He seems to be trying to expand on Murtha’s earmarking prowess.)
ParticipantJust for the record… It was a Florida Republican who added the funding. Dem’s are objecting.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124969431303416161.html
Some lawmakers say they often know more about what the military needs than the executive branch does.
“The Pentagon is not the fountain of all knowledge,” said Rep. Bill Young, a Florida Republican who was senior appropriator on the House floor last month when the Pentagon spending bill was approved. “They don’t have all of the knowledge, and they don’t have all of the wisdom. Neither does the administration, neither does the Congress. That’s why we work together.”
(He seems to be trying to expand on Murtha’s earmarking prowess.)
ParticipantJust for the record… It was a Florida Republican who added the funding. Dem’s are objecting.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124969431303416161.html
Some lawmakers say they often know more about what the military needs than the executive branch does.
“The Pentagon is not the fountain of all knowledge,” said Rep. Bill Young, a Florida Republican who was senior appropriator on the House floor last month when the Pentagon spending bill was approved. “They don’t have all of the knowledge, and they don’t have all of the wisdom. Neither does the administration, neither does the Congress. That’s why we work together.”
(He seems to be trying to expand on Murtha’s earmarking prowess.)
ParticipantJust for the record… It was a Florida Republican who added the funding. Dem’s are objecting.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124969431303416161.html
Some lawmakers say they often know more about what the military needs than the executive branch does.
“The Pentagon is not the fountain of all knowledge,” said Rep. Bill Young, a Florida Republican who was senior appropriator on the House floor last month when the Pentagon spending bill was approved. “They don’t have all of the knowledge, and they don’t have all of the wisdom. Neither does the administration, neither does the Congress. That’s why we work together.”
(He seems to be trying to expand on Murtha’s earmarking prowess.)
ParticipantJust for the record… It was a Florida Republican who added the funding. Dem’s are objecting.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124969431303416161.html
Some lawmakers say they often know more about what the military needs than the executive branch does.
“The Pentagon is not the fountain of all knowledge,” said Rep. Bill Young, a Florida Republican who was senior appropriator on the House floor last month when the Pentagon spending bill was approved. “They don’t have all of the knowledge, and they don’t have all of the wisdom. Neither does the administration, neither does the Congress. That’s why we work together.”
(He seems to be trying to expand on Murtha’s earmarking prowess.)
August 7, 2009 at 7:45 AM in reply to: UT: Dip in property-tax defaults delights county’s collector #441944Participant[quote=fsbo]I know a guy who has been in property-tax defaults since 2006. Not paying any single cent of property tax, he owes SD county over $20K by now, not including the penalties.
What will be the consequence of property-tax defaults? It seems county’s collector would rather collect the tax later for more penalties:)[/quote]I’m curious about this for purely vindictive reasons. The slimy contractor that abandoned our project is currently in default to the tune of over $14k. I’d love to see something more tangible done to him than just being listed in default for a few years. (He also has a state tax lien against him.)
I’m not surprised, he took our money and didn’t pay subs… so why would he pay tax obligations. (Like I said – I’m vindictive in my interest. Not the nicest side of my personality.)August 7, 2009 at 7:45 AM in reply to: UT: Dip in property-tax defaults delights county’s collector #442142Participant[quote=fsbo]I know a guy who has been in property-tax defaults since 2006. Not paying any single cent of property tax, he owes SD county over $20K by now, not including the penalties.
What will be the consequence of property-tax defaults? It seems county’s collector would rather collect the tax later for more penalties:)[/quote]I’m curious about this for purely vindictive reasons. The slimy contractor that abandoned our project is currently in default to the tune of over $14k. I’d love to see something more tangible done to him than just being listed in default for a few years. (He also has a state tax lien against him.)
I’m not surprised, he took our money and didn’t pay subs… so why would he pay tax obligations. (Like I said – I’m vindictive in my interest. Not the nicest side of my personality.) -
AuthorPosts
