Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
TheBreezeParticipant
This is minor from a fiscal sense. It is the bankster welfare queens that are costing this country trillions. The carmaker bailout isn’t even going to amount to $200 billion most likely. Pocket change really.
IMHO, small potatoes stuff like this is being done to distract clueless people like FLU from the immense looting that is being done by the banks.
Actually, as near as I can tell, FLU has always been in favor of massive welfare for the super-rich while focussing his ire on the relatively minor amounts of welfare going to the people in the form of food stamps, unemployment benefits, and the like. I find this ironic now that FLU is actually a ward of the state himself. It’s quite hypocritical, but like most hypocrites he doesn’t even realize it.
TheBreezeParticipantThis is minor from a fiscal sense. It is the bankster welfare queens that are costing this country trillions. The carmaker bailout isn’t even going to amount to $200 billion most likely. Pocket change really.
IMHO, small potatoes stuff like this is being done to distract clueless people like FLU from the immense looting that is being done by the banks.
Actually, as near as I can tell, FLU has always been in favor of massive welfare for the super-rich while focussing his ire on the relatively minor amounts of welfare going to the people in the form of food stamps, unemployment benefits, and the like. I find this ironic now that FLU is actually a ward of the state himself. It’s quite hypocritical, but like most hypocrites he doesn’t even realize it.
TheBreezeParticipantThis is minor from a fiscal sense. It is the bankster welfare queens that are costing this country trillions. The carmaker bailout isn’t even going to amount to $200 billion most likely. Pocket change really.
IMHO, small potatoes stuff like this is being done to distract clueless people like FLU from the immense looting that is being done by the banks.
Actually, as near as I can tell, FLU has always been in favor of massive welfare for the super-rich while focussing his ire on the relatively minor amounts of welfare going to the people in the form of food stamps, unemployment benefits, and the like. I find this ironic now that FLU is actually a ward of the state himself. It’s quite hypocritical, but like most hypocrites he doesn’t even realize it.
TheBreezeParticipantThis is minor from a fiscal sense. It is the bankster welfare queens that are costing this country trillions. The carmaker bailout isn’t even going to amount to $200 billion most likely. Pocket change really.
IMHO, small potatoes stuff like this is being done to distract clueless people like FLU from the immense looting that is being done by the banks.
Actually, as near as I can tell, FLU has always been in favor of massive welfare for the super-rich while focussing his ire on the relatively minor amounts of welfare going to the people in the form of food stamps, unemployment benefits, and the like. I find this ironic now that FLU is actually a ward of the state himself. It’s quite hypocritical, but like most hypocrites he doesn’t even realize it.
TheBreezeParticipant[quote=madmoney]
Everyone is looking for a damn bailout! Thank you U.S. Government. Sure I could have told the customer to kiss my ass but with a small business that is trying to survive and having shed several customers already I would rather have a customer at $275/month than a customer at $0/month. Of course at some point I wouldn’t have done it, say anything below $250, but regardless I’m starting to hate this process. This is just one example, I could go on. When is this going to end? Is it ever going to end?[/quote]
You are confused. Your customers aren’t looking for a bailout. They are merely negotiating a reasonable price with you based on market forces and other factors. This is actually the free market at work and is quite the opposite of a bailout.
Edit:For future reference, bailouts always involve the money of a non-involved third party. Here, it’s just you and your customers. Since there is no money from an uninvolved third-party (e.g., taxpayer) at risk, the scenario you describe in no way resembles a bailout.
TheBreezeParticipant[quote=madmoney]
Everyone is looking for a damn bailout! Thank you U.S. Government. Sure I could have told the customer to kiss my ass but with a small business that is trying to survive and having shed several customers already I would rather have a customer at $275/month than a customer at $0/month. Of course at some point I wouldn’t have done it, say anything below $250, but regardless I’m starting to hate this process. This is just one example, I could go on. When is this going to end? Is it ever going to end?[/quote]
You are confused. Your customers aren’t looking for a bailout. They are merely negotiating a reasonable price with you based on market forces and other factors. This is actually the free market at work and is quite the opposite of a bailout.
Edit:For future reference, bailouts always involve the money of a non-involved third party. Here, it’s just you and your customers. Since there is no money from an uninvolved third-party (e.g., taxpayer) at risk, the scenario you describe in no way resembles a bailout.
TheBreezeParticipant[quote=madmoney]
Everyone is looking for a damn bailout! Thank you U.S. Government. Sure I could have told the customer to kiss my ass but with a small business that is trying to survive and having shed several customers already I would rather have a customer at $275/month than a customer at $0/month. Of course at some point I wouldn’t have done it, say anything below $250, but regardless I’m starting to hate this process. This is just one example, I could go on. When is this going to end? Is it ever going to end?[/quote]
You are confused. Your customers aren’t looking for a bailout. They are merely negotiating a reasonable price with you based on market forces and other factors. This is actually the free market at work and is quite the opposite of a bailout.
Edit:For future reference, bailouts always involve the money of a non-involved third party. Here, it’s just you and your customers. Since there is no money from an uninvolved third-party (e.g., taxpayer) at risk, the scenario you describe in no way resembles a bailout.
TheBreezeParticipant[quote=madmoney]
Everyone is looking for a damn bailout! Thank you U.S. Government. Sure I could have told the customer to kiss my ass but with a small business that is trying to survive and having shed several customers already I would rather have a customer at $275/month than a customer at $0/month. Of course at some point I wouldn’t have done it, say anything below $250, but regardless I’m starting to hate this process. This is just one example, I could go on. When is this going to end? Is it ever going to end?[/quote]
You are confused. Your customers aren’t looking for a bailout. They are merely negotiating a reasonable price with you based on market forces and other factors. This is actually the free market at work and is quite the opposite of a bailout.
Edit:For future reference, bailouts always involve the money of a non-involved third party. Here, it’s just you and your customers. Since there is no money from an uninvolved third-party (e.g., taxpayer) at risk, the scenario you describe in no way resembles a bailout.
TheBreezeParticipant[quote=madmoney]
Everyone is looking for a damn bailout! Thank you U.S. Government. Sure I could have told the customer to kiss my ass but with a small business that is trying to survive and having shed several customers already I would rather have a customer at $275/month than a customer at $0/month. Of course at some point I wouldn’t have done it, say anything below $250, but regardless I’m starting to hate this process. This is just one example, I could go on. When is this going to end? Is it ever going to end?[/quote]
You are confused. Your customers aren’t looking for a bailout. They are merely negotiating a reasonable price with you based on market forces and other factors. This is actually the free market at work and is quite the opposite of a bailout.
Edit:For future reference, bailouts always involve the money of a non-involved third party. Here, it’s just you and your customers. Since there is no money from an uninvolved third-party (e.g., taxpayer) at risk, the scenario you describe in no way resembles a bailout.
March 26, 2009 at 8:05 AM in reply to: How is this not a formula for looting the U. S. Treasury? #373208TheBreezeParticipantYou guys, You guys! Calm down! Bernanke is a fighter! He’s the smartest guy in the room! Sure the guy hasn’t gotten anything right since he’s been at the Fed, but that’s all about to change.
Just joshing. Bernanke’s a fucking corrupt tool and this looting is already happening:
March 26, 2009 at 8:05 AM in reply to: How is this not a formula for looting the U. S. Treasury? #373490TheBreezeParticipantYou guys, You guys! Calm down! Bernanke is a fighter! He’s the smartest guy in the room! Sure the guy hasn’t gotten anything right since he’s been at the Fed, but that’s all about to change.
Just joshing. Bernanke’s a fucking corrupt tool and this looting is already happening:
March 26, 2009 at 8:05 AM in reply to: How is this not a formula for looting the U. S. Treasury? #373662TheBreezeParticipantYou guys, You guys! Calm down! Bernanke is a fighter! He’s the smartest guy in the room! Sure the guy hasn’t gotten anything right since he’s been at the Fed, but that’s all about to change.
Just joshing. Bernanke’s a fucking corrupt tool and this looting is already happening:
March 26, 2009 at 8:05 AM in reply to: How is this not a formula for looting the U. S. Treasury? #373705TheBreezeParticipantYou guys, You guys! Calm down! Bernanke is a fighter! He’s the smartest guy in the room! Sure the guy hasn’t gotten anything right since he’s been at the Fed, but that’s all about to change.
Just joshing. Bernanke’s a fucking corrupt tool and this looting is already happening:
March 26, 2009 at 8:05 AM in reply to: How is this not a formula for looting the U. S. Treasury? #373821TheBreezeParticipantYou guys, You guys! Calm down! Bernanke is a fighter! He’s the smartest guy in the room! Sure the guy hasn’t gotten anything right since he’s been at the Fed, but that’s all about to change.
Just joshing. Bernanke’s a fucking corrupt tool and this looting is already happening:
-
AuthorPosts