[StaunchLibertarian]

[quote=sdrealtor]It is all driven by government-limited supply and government-supported demand.
[/quote]

Fixed your post.

On the supply side, government is limiting supply by propping up banks who would otherwise implode and release their REO inventory onto the market.

On the demand side, Fannie and Freddie are still over 90% of the mortgage market. Remove those two and demand (along with housing prices) would crater.

[StaunchLibertarian]

[quote=sdrealtor]It is all driven by government-limited supply and government-supported demand.
[/quote]

Fixed your post.

On the supply side, government is limiting supply by propping up banks who would otherwise implode and release their REO inventory onto the market.

On the demand side, Fannie and Freddie are still over 90% of the mortgage market. Remove those two and demand (along with housing prices) would crater.

[StaunchLibertarian]

[quote=sdrealtor]It is all driven by government-limited supply and government-supported demand.
[/quote]

Fixed your post.

On the supply side, government is limiting supply by propping up banks who would otherwise implode and release their REO inventory onto the market.

On the demand side, Fannie and Freddie are still over 90% of the mortgage market. Remove those two and demand (along with housing prices) would crater.

[StaunchLibertarian]

[quote=sdrealtor]It is all driven by government-limited supply and government-supported demand.
[/quote]

Fixed your post.

On the supply side, government is limiting supply by propping up banks who would otherwise implode and release their REO inventory onto the market.

On the demand side, Fannie and Freddie are still over 90% of the mortgage market. Remove those two and demand (along with housing prices) would crater.

[StaunchLibertarian]

[quote=sdrealtor]It is all driven by government-limited supply and government-supported demand.
[/quote]

Fixed your post.

On the supply side, government is limiting supply by propping up banks who would otherwise implode and release their REO inventory onto the market.

On the demand side, Fannie and Freddie are still over 90% of the mortgage market. Remove those two and demand (along with housing prices) would crater.

[StaunchLibertarian]

[quote=paramount]
I for one am only a Libertarian in the Constitutional/Liberal sense. Not in the sense that it’s ok to build a quarry next to my house; I’ll leave that line of thinking to the Reagan/Gingrich Republicans which apparently aren’t that large in numbers around Temecula.[/quote]

Yes, not that large in number except for Republican Darrell Issa, the guy who Temecula elected to represent them.

[StaunchLibertarian]

[quote=paramount]
I for one am only a Libertarian in the Constitutional/Liberal sense. Not in the sense that it’s ok to build a quarry next to my house; I’ll leave that line of thinking to the Reagan/Gingrich Republicans which apparently aren’t that large in numbers around Temecula.[/quote]

Yes, not that large in number except for Republican Darrell Issa, the guy who Temecula elected to represent them.

[StaunchLibertarian]

[quote=paramount]
I for one am only a Libertarian in the Constitutional/Liberal sense. Not in the sense that it’s ok to build a quarry next to my house; I’ll leave that line of thinking to the Reagan/Gingrich Republicans which apparently aren’t that large in numbers around Temecula.[/quote]

Yes, not that large in number except for Republican Darrell Issa, the guy who Temecula elected to represent them.

[StaunchLibertarian]

[quote=paramount]
I for one am only a Libertarian in the Constitutional/Liberal sense. Not in the sense that it’s ok to build a quarry next to my house; I’ll leave that line of thinking to the Reagan/Gingrich Republicans which apparently aren’t that large in numbers around Temecula.[/quote]

Yes, not that large in number except for Republican Darrell Issa, the guy who Temecula elected to represent them.

[StaunchLibertarian]

[quote=paramount]
I for one am only a Libertarian in the Constitutional/Liberal sense. Not in the sense that it’s ok to build a quarry next to my house; I’ll leave that line of thinking to the Reagan/Gingrich Republicans which apparently aren’t that large in numbers around Temecula.[/quote]

Yes, not that large in number except for Republican Darrell Issa, the guy who Temecula elected to represent them.

[StaunchLibertarian]

[quote=paramount]
If it goes through, I will partially blame it on the public employee unions. Riverside County is so desperate for revenue they will throw Temecula under the bus in a heartbeat.[/quote]

Please. Temecula Republicans/Libertarians are getting exactly what they asked for. Temecula is represented by Republican Darrell Issa. Darrell Issa’s main concern is whether ‘government is holding back your business.’

http://issa.house.gov/

What happens when government (also known as ‘the people’) is not allowed to ‘hold back business?’ What happens is projects like this quarry which will benefit a few wealthy businesspersons while potentially harming tens of thousands gets the go-ahead.

In fact, Darrell Issa was a supporter of the quarry.

http://mail.thevillagenews.com/story/28235/

He accepted campaign contributions from the quarry owners.

http://thatsmycongress.com/index.php/2006/09/27/criscenzo-interview/

What’s Darrell Issa doing right now? Probably gutting environmental regulations.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0211/48995.html

Don’t worry though. In accordance with Libertarian principles you can seek monetary compensation though the courts should your health or property be damaged. You can expect to be reimbursed for any damages in 5-20 years assuming you don’t go bankrupt or die first.

It’ll be interesting to see how many in Temecula continue to hold fast to their Republican and Libertarian principles now that they get to experience it first-hand rather than just in theory.

[StaunchLibertarian]

[quote=paramount]
If it goes through, I will partially blame it on the public employee unions. Riverside County is so desperate for revenue they will throw Temecula under the bus in a heartbeat.[/quote]

Please. Temecula Republicans/Libertarians are getting exactly what they asked for. Temecula is represented by Republican Darrell Issa. Darrell Issa’s main concern is whether ‘government is holding back your business.’

http://issa.house.gov/

What happens when government (also known as ‘the people’) is not allowed to ‘hold back business?’ What happens is projects like this quarry which will benefit a few wealthy businesspersons while potentially harming tens of thousands gets the go-ahead.

In fact, Darrell Issa was a supporter of the quarry.

http://mail.thevillagenews.com/story/28235/

He accepted campaign contributions from the quarry owners.

http://thatsmycongress.com/index.php/2006/09/27/criscenzo-interview/

What’s Darrell Issa doing right now? Probably gutting environmental regulations.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0211/48995.html

Don’t worry though. In accordance with Libertarian principles you can seek monetary compensation though the courts should your health or property be damaged. You can expect to be reimbursed for any damages in 5-20 years assuming you don’t go bankrupt or die first.

It’ll be interesting to see how many in Temecula continue to hold fast to their Republican and Libertarian principles now that they get to experience it first-hand rather than just in theory.

[StaunchLibertarian]

[quote=paramount]
If it goes through, I will partially blame it on the public employee unions. Riverside County is so desperate for revenue they will throw Temecula under the bus in a heartbeat.[/quote]

Please. Temecula Republicans/Libertarians are getting exactly what they asked for. Temecula is represented by Republican Darrell Issa. Darrell Issa’s main concern is whether ‘government is holding back your business.’

http://issa.house.gov/

What happens when government (also known as ‘the people’) is not allowed to ‘hold back business?’ What happens is projects like this quarry which will benefit a few wealthy businesspersons while potentially harming tens of thousands gets the go-ahead.

In fact, Darrell Issa was a supporter of the quarry.

http://mail.thevillagenews.com/story/28235/

He accepted campaign contributions from the quarry owners.

http://thatsmycongress.com/index.php/2006/09/27/criscenzo-interview/

What’s Darrell Issa doing right now? Probably gutting environmental regulations.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0211/48995.html

Don’t worry though. In accordance with Libertarian principles you can seek monetary compensation though the courts should your health or property be damaged. You can expect to be reimbursed for any damages in 5-20 years assuming you don’t go bankrupt or die first.

It’ll be interesting to see how many in Temecula continue to hold fast to their Republican and Libertarian principles now that they get to experience it first-hand rather than just in theory.

[StaunchLibertarian]

[quote=paramount]
If it goes through, I will partially blame it on the public employee unions. Riverside County is so desperate for revenue they will throw Temecula under the bus in a heartbeat.[/quote]

Please. Temecula Republicans/Libertarians are getting exactly what they asked for. Temecula is represented by Republican Darrell Issa. Darrell Issa’s main concern is whether ‘government is holding back your business.’

http://issa.house.gov/

What happens when government (also known as ‘the people’) is not allowed to ‘hold back business?’ What happens is projects like this quarry which will benefit a few wealthy businesspersons while potentially harming tens of thousands gets the go-ahead.

In fact, Darrell Issa was a supporter of the quarry.

http://mail.thevillagenews.com/story/28235/

He accepted campaign contributions from the quarry owners.

http://thatsmycongress.com/index.php/2006/09/27/criscenzo-interview/

What’s Darrell Issa doing right now? Probably gutting environmental regulations.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0211/48995.html

Don’t worry though. In accordance with Libertarian principles you can seek monetary compensation though the courts should your health or property be damaged. You can expect to be reimbursed for any damages in 5-20 years assuming you don’t go bankrupt or die first.

It’ll be interesting to see how many in Temecula continue to hold fast to their Republican and Libertarian principles now that they get to experience it first-hand rather than just in theory.

[StaunchLibertarian]

[quote=paramount]
If it goes through, I will partially blame it on the public employee unions. Riverside County is so desperate for revenue they will throw Temecula under the bus in a heartbeat.[/quote]

Please. Temecula Republicans/Libertarians are getting exactly what they asked for. Temecula is represented by Republican Darrell Issa. Darrell Issa’s main concern is whether ‘government is holding back your business.’

http://issa.house.gov/

What happens when government (also known as ‘the people’) is not allowed to ‘hold back business?’ What happens is projects like this quarry which will benefit a few wealthy businesspersons while potentially harming tens of thousands gets the go-ahead.

In fact, Darrell Issa was a supporter of the quarry.

http://mail.thevillagenews.com/story/28235/

He accepted campaign contributions from the quarry owners.

http://thatsmycongress.com/index.php/2006/09/27/criscenzo-interview/

What’s Darrell Issa doing right now? Probably gutting environmental regulations.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0211/48995.html

Don’t worry though. In accordance with Libertarian principles you can seek monetary compensation though the courts should your health or property be damaged. You can expect to be reimbursed for any damages in 5-20 years assuming you don’t go bankrupt or die first.

It’ll be interesting to see how many in Temecula continue to hold fast to their Republican and Libertarian principles now that they get to experience it first-hand rather than just in theory.

[Author]

Posts