It was already covered in another thread but for those that missed it this is lousy journalism. The median was 350K in November and they are using an annual median which is meaningless. Most of that “projected” 21.1% decline has already occurred. Thats not news.
It was already covered in another thread but for those that missed it this is lousy journalism. The median was 350K in November and they are using an annual median which is meaningless. Most of that “projected” 21.1% decline has already occurred. Thats not news.
It was already covered in another thread but for those that missed it this is lousy journalism. The median was 350K in November and they are using an annual median which is meaningless. Most of that “projected” 21.1% decline has already occurred. Thats not news.
It was already covered in another thread but for those that missed it this is lousy journalism. The median was 350K in November and they are using an annual median which is meaningless. Most of that “projected” 21.1% decline has already occurred. Thats not news.
It was already covered in another thread but for those that missed it this is lousy journalism. The median was 350K in November and they are using an annual median which is meaningless. Most of that “projected” 21.1% decline has already occurred. Thats not news.
