Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
SDEngineer
ParticipantAppears to be an idiot who has decided that a whole commission on no sale is better than half a commission on a closed sale. Probably one of the new breed of Realtors who signed up during the easy money days a few years ago who has no clue how to actually market themselves or their business during the tougher times.
ParticipantAppears to be an idiot who has decided that a whole commission on no sale is better than half a commission on a closed sale. Probably one of the new breed of Realtors who signed up during the easy money days a few years ago who has no clue how to actually market themselves or their business during the tougher times.
ParticipantAppears to be an idiot who has decided that a whole commission on no sale is better than half a commission on a closed sale. Probably one of the new breed of Realtors who signed up during the easy money days a few years ago who has no clue how to actually market themselves or their business during the tougher times.
ParticipantAppears to be an idiot who has decided that a whole commission on no sale is better than half a commission on a closed sale. Probably one of the new breed of Realtors who signed up during the easy money days a few years ago who has no clue how to actually market themselves or their business during the tougher times.
ParticipantAppears to be an idiot who has decided that a whole commission on no sale is better than half a commission on a closed sale. Probably one of the new breed of Realtors who signed up during the easy money days a few years ago who has no clue how to actually market themselves or their business during the tougher times.
ParticipantI am very strongly considering buying in the fall/winter of this year. I don’t think we’ll be at the bottom then, but we’ll probably be another 10-15% closer to it, and we’ll be starting to see rent parity in some of the outlying areas (I’ll be buying in North County). Since we’re planning on staying whereever we buy for at least 7-10 years, I think we should be ok.
If I were looking at 4S, Scripps Ranch, or CV there is no way I would buy this year – I think theres still a lot of bubble air to be bled out of those areas. But I suspect the nicer areas of Escondido and San Marcos will be somewhere close to the bottom.
ParticipantI am very strongly considering buying in the fall/winter of this year. I don’t think we’ll be at the bottom then, but we’ll probably be another 10-15% closer to it, and we’ll be starting to see rent parity in some of the outlying areas (I’ll be buying in North County). Since we’re planning on staying whereever we buy for at least 7-10 years, I think we should be ok.
If I were looking at 4S, Scripps Ranch, or CV there is no way I would buy this year – I think theres still a lot of bubble air to be bled out of those areas. But I suspect the nicer areas of Escondido and San Marcos will be somewhere close to the bottom.
ParticipantI am very strongly considering buying in the fall/winter of this year. I don’t think we’ll be at the bottom then, but we’ll probably be another 10-15% closer to it, and we’ll be starting to see rent parity in some of the outlying areas (I’ll be buying in North County). Since we’re planning on staying whereever we buy for at least 7-10 years, I think we should be ok.
If I were looking at 4S, Scripps Ranch, or CV there is no way I would buy this year – I think theres still a lot of bubble air to be bled out of those areas. But I suspect the nicer areas of Escondido and San Marcos will be somewhere close to the bottom.
ParticipantI am very strongly considering buying in the fall/winter of this year. I don’t think we’ll be at the bottom then, but we’ll probably be another 10-15% closer to it, and we’ll be starting to see rent parity in some of the outlying areas (I’ll be buying in North County). Since we’re planning on staying whereever we buy for at least 7-10 years, I think we should be ok.
If I were looking at 4S, Scripps Ranch, or CV there is no way I would buy this year – I think theres still a lot of bubble air to be bled out of those areas. But I suspect the nicer areas of Escondido and San Marcos will be somewhere close to the bottom.
ParticipantI am very strongly considering buying in the fall/winter of this year. I don’t think we’ll be at the bottom then, but we’ll probably be another 10-15% closer to it, and we’ll be starting to see rent parity in some of the outlying areas (I’ll be buying in North County). Since we’re planning on staying whereever we buy for at least 7-10 years, I think we should be ok.
If I were looking at 4S, Scripps Ranch, or CV there is no way I would buy this year – I think theres still a lot of bubble air to be bled out of those areas. But I suspect the nicer areas of Escondido and San Marcos will be somewhere close to the bottom.
ParticipantFully support this ruling and will vote against any attempt to amend the state constitution to ban it in that fashion (as I voted against prop 22).
The fact of the matter is that while some people may see it as a religious issue (as at least one of the posters here has framed the issue), not all religions (not even all Christian sects) have the same problem with “Adam and Steve” as the one poster’s clearly does. Which makes it – if the issue is religious – a religious freedom issue.
Of course, as long as the government can certify that people are married (and even marry them itself), and as long as being “married” has de facto civil benefits, the government should not be able to discriminate based on a characteristic or trait of a person completely outside of their control – which sexual orientation has proven to be (whether nature or nurture – or both – every reputable piece of research into this has concluded that it is clearly not a personal choice).
As to the message it sends to our youth – I prefer to think that it sends a message that we will tolerate differences, not exclude people based on them. It wasn’t so long ago that the exact same questions were being asked about allowing interracial marriages – heck, I remember back in the 70’s when I was young, it was a small neighborhood scandal when a interracial couple moved onto our La Jolla street – despite the fact that the couple was very well-educated, well-spoken, and exceedingly polite, I still overheard many things (it’s amazing what adults will let slip around kids).
On the question of their raising kids, I believed there have been several studies done that show that kids raised by gay couples are certainly no worse off than kids raised by straight couples, and may even have some advantages. One reason why pediatrics associations back gay adoptions.
ParticipantFully support this ruling and will vote against any attempt to amend the state constitution to ban it in that fashion (as I voted against prop 22).
The fact of the matter is that while some people may see it as a religious issue (as at least one of the posters here has framed the issue), not all religions (not even all Christian sects) have the same problem with “Adam and Steve” as the one poster’s clearly does. Which makes it – if the issue is religious – a religious freedom issue.
Of course, as long as the government can certify that people are married (and even marry them itself), and as long as being “married” has de facto civil benefits, the government should not be able to discriminate based on a characteristic or trait of a person completely outside of their control – which sexual orientation has proven to be (whether nature or nurture – or both – every reputable piece of research into this has concluded that it is clearly not a personal choice).
As to the message it sends to our youth – I prefer to think that it sends a message that we will tolerate differences, not exclude people based on them. It wasn’t so long ago that the exact same questions were being asked about allowing interracial marriages – heck, I remember back in the 70’s when I was young, it was a small neighborhood scandal when a interracial couple moved onto our La Jolla street – despite the fact that the couple was very well-educated, well-spoken, and exceedingly polite, I still overheard many things (it’s amazing what adults will let slip around kids).
On the question of their raising kids, I believed there have been several studies done that show that kids raised by gay couples are certainly no worse off than kids raised by straight couples, and may even have some advantages. One reason why pediatrics associations back gay adoptions.
ParticipantFully support this ruling and will vote against any attempt to amend the state constitution to ban it in that fashion (as I voted against prop 22).
The fact of the matter is that while some people may see it as a religious issue (as at least one of the posters here has framed the issue), not all religions (not even all Christian sects) have the same problem with “Adam and Steve” as the one poster’s clearly does. Which makes it – if the issue is religious – a religious freedom issue.
Of course, as long as the government can certify that people are married (and even marry them itself), and as long as being “married” has de facto civil benefits, the government should not be able to discriminate based on a characteristic or trait of a person completely outside of their control – which sexual orientation has proven to be (whether nature or nurture – or both – every reputable piece of research into this has concluded that it is clearly not a personal choice).
As to the message it sends to our youth – I prefer to think that it sends a message that we will tolerate differences, not exclude people based on them. It wasn’t so long ago that the exact same questions were being asked about allowing interracial marriages – heck, I remember back in the 70’s when I was young, it was a small neighborhood scandal when a interracial couple moved onto our La Jolla street – despite the fact that the couple was very well-educated, well-spoken, and exceedingly polite, I still overheard many things (it’s amazing what adults will let slip around kids).
On the question of their raising kids, I believed there have been several studies done that show that kids raised by gay couples are certainly no worse off than kids raised by straight couples, and may even have some advantages. One reason why pediatrics associations back gay adoptions.
ParticipantFully support this ruling and will vote against any attempt to amend the state constitution to ban it in that fashion (as I voted against prop 22).
The fact of the matter is that while some people may see it as a religious issue (as at least one of the posters here has framed the issue), not all religions (not even all Christian sects) have the same problem with “Adam and Steve” as the one poster’s clearly does. Which makes it – if the issue is religious – a religious freedom issue.
Of course, as long as the government can certify that people are married (and even marry them itself), and as long as being “married” has de facto civil benefits, the government should not be able to discriminate based on a characteristic or trait of a person completely outside of their control – which sexual orientation has proven to be (whether nature or nurture – or both – every reputable piece of research into this has concluded that it is clearly not a personal choice).
As to the message it sends to our youth – I prefer to think that it sends a message that we will tolerate differences, not exclude people based on them. It wasn’t so long ago that the exact same questions were being asked about allowing interracial marriages – heck, I remember back in the 70’s when I was young, it was a small neighborhood scandal when a interracial couple moved onto our La Jolla street – despite the fact that the couple was very well-educated, well-spoken, and exceedingly polite, I still overheard many things (it’s amazing what adults will let slip around kids).
On the question of their raising kids, I believed there have been several studies done that show that kids raised by gay couples are certainly no worse off than kids raised by straight couples, and may even have some advantages. One reason why pediatrics associations back gay adoptions.
-
AuthorPosts
