Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 19, 2009 at 8:27 AM in reply to: Credit Card Industry Aims to Profit From Sterling Payers #401876
SDEngineer
ParticipantIf they implement these measures, I suspect it will just lead to the return of the check.
May 19, 2009 at 8:27 AM in reply to: Credit Card Industry Aims to Profit From Sterling Payers #402128SDEngineer
ParticipantIf they implement these measures, I suspect it will just lead to the return of the check.
May 19, 2009 at 8:27 AM in reply to: Credit Card Industry Aims to Profit From Sterling Payers #402360SDEngineer
ParticipantIf they implement these measures, I suspect it will just lead to the return of the check.
May 19, 2009 at 8:27 AM in reply to: Credit Card Industry Aims to Profit From Sterling Payers #402419SDEngineer
ParticipantIf they implement these measures, I suspect it will just lead to the return of the check.
May 19, 2009 at 8:27 AM in reply to: Credit Card Industry Aims to Profit From Sterling Payers #402567SDEngineer
ParticipantIf they implement these measures, I suspect it will just lead to the return of the check.
SDEngineer
Participant[quote=UCGal]I assume HOA fees would also have to factor in. A house with no HOA and no Mello Roos would be a simple ratio calculation. A house in a neighborhood with mello roos and HOA would have to have a lower ratio to realize the same cash flow.[/quote]
Yes. I figure HOA/MR at about 10K of buying power lost for every $50 in those fees.
SDEngineer
Participant[quote=UCGal]I assume HOA fees would also have to factor in. A house with no HOA and no Mello Roos would be a simple ratio calculation. A house in a neighborhood with mello roos and HOA would have to have a lower ratio to realize the same cash flow.[/quote]
Yes. I figure HOA/MR at about 10K of buying power lost for every $50 in those fees.
SDEngineer
Participant[quote=UCGal]I assume HOA fees would also have to factor in. A house with no HOA and no Mello Roos would be a simple ratio calculation. A house in a neighborhood with mello roos and HOA would have to have a lower ratio to realize the same cash flow.[/quote]
Yes. I figure HOA/MR at about 10K of buying power lost for every $50 in those fees.
SDEngineer
Participant[quote=UCGal]I assume HOA fees would also have to factor in. A house with no HOA and no Mello Roos would be a simple ratio calculation. A house in a neighborhood with mello roos and HOA would have to have a lower ratio to realize the same cash flow.[/quote]
Yes. I figure HOA/MR at about 10K of buying power lost for every $50 in those fees.
SDEngineer
Participant[quote=UCGal]I assume HOA fees would also have to factor in. A house with no HOA and no Mello Roos would be a simple ratio calculation. A house in a neighborhood with mello roos and HOA would have to have a lower ratio to realize the same cash flow.[/quote]
Yes. I figure HOA/MR at about 10K of buying power lost for every $50 in those fees.
SDEngineer
Participant[quote=ybitz]Even in Mira Mesa (definitely not high end), the ratio seems to be over 200.
Ratio: 217
$1860 rent [craigslist]
http://sandiego.craigslist.org/csd/ap/1177483541.html
$404,500 price[zillow]
http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/11559-Polaris-Dr-San-Diego-CA-92126/16819385_zpid/Ratio: 211
$1900 rent [craigslist]
http://sandiego.craigslist.org/csd/apa/1177473494.html
price[zillow]
$401,500 price [zillow]
http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/7462-Dancy-Rd-San-Diego-CA-92126/16834149_zpid/And I thought the real estate bubble had burst in the non-high-end areas such as mira mesa. How come we’re not seeing ratios in the more reasonable 150 range?[/quote]
Zestimate is garbage. They’re pretty consistently well higher than what the market price is these days, and have been since the crash started – their model appears to be quite laggy.
If you’ll look on the MLS, you’ll find comparable area/size 4/2’s going in the 320-350ish range. The highest a 4/2 of that size has closed in the past couple of months is at 375K.
Here’s a close from 3/30 of this year – similar size, area (north of Mira Mesa Blvd), lot, and configuration. Sold for 325K.
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-090004996-8293_Calle_Calzada_San_Diego_Ca_92126
That takes it down to about 160-180x. Not investment territory, but not terrible.
But I don’t think MM’s SFR’s have bottomed quite yet. However, they’re pretty clearly a lot closer to the bottom than the ritzier areas. The areas furthest from the city core have come down farther (San Marcos, East County, etc).
SDEngineer
Participant[quote=ybitz]Even in Mira Mesa (definitely not high end), the ratio seems to be over 200.
Ratio: 217
$1860 rent [craigslist]
http://sandiego.craigslist.org/csd/ap/1177483541.html
$404,500 price[zillow]
http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/11559-Polaris-Dr-San-Diego-CA-92126/16819385_zpid/Ratio: 211
$1900 rent [craigslist]
http://sandiego.craigslist.org/csd/apa/1177473494.html
price[zillow]
$401,500 price [zillow]
http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/7462-Dancy-Rd-San-Diego-CA-92126/16834149_zpid/And I thought the real estate bubble had burst in the non-high-end areas such as mira mesa. How come we’re not seeing ratios in the more reasonable 150 range?[/quote]
Zestimate is garbage. They’re pretty consistently well higher than what the market price is these days, and have been since the crash started – their model appears to be quite laggy.
If you’ll look on the MLS, you’ll find comparable area/size 4/2’s going in the 320-350ish range. The highest a 4/2 of that size has closed in the past couple of months is at 375K.
Here’s a close from 3/30 of this year – similar size, area (north of Mira Mesa Blvd), lot, and configuration. Sold for 325K.
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-090004996-8293_Calle_Calzada_San_Diego_Ca_92126
That takes it down to about 160-180x. Not investment territory, but not terrible.
But I don’t think MM’s SFR’s have bottomed quite yet. However, they’re pretty clearly a lot closer to the bottom than the ritzier areas. The areas furthest from the city core have come down farther (San Marcos, East County, etc).
SDEngineer
Participant[quote=ybitz]Even in Mira Mesa (definitely not high end), the ratio seems to be over 200.
Ratio: 217
$1860 rent [craigslist]
http://sandiego.craigslist.org/csd/ap/1177483541.html
$404,500 price[zillow]
http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/11559-Polaris-Dr-San-Diego-CA-92126/16819385_zpid/Ratio: 211
$1900 rent [craigslist]
http://sandiego.craigslist.org/csd/apa/1177473494.html
price[zillow]
$401,500 price [zillow]
http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/7462-Dancy-Rd-San-Diego-CA-92126/16834149_zpid/And I thought the real estate bubble had burst in the non-high-end areas such as mira mesa. How come we’re not seeing ratios in the more reasonable 150 range?[/quote]
Zestimate is garbage. They’re pretty consistently well higher than what the market price is these days, and have been since the crash started – their model appears to be quite laggy.
If you’ll look on the MLS, you’ll find comparable area/size 4/2’s going in the 320-350ish range. The highest a 4/2 of that size has closed in the past couple of months is at 375K.
Here’s a close from 3/30 of this year – similar size, area (north of Mira Mesa Blvd), lot, and configuration. Sold for 325K.
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-090004996-8293_Calle_Calzada_San_Diego_Ca_92126
That takes it down to about 160-180x. Not investment territory, but not terrible.
But I don’t think MM’s SFR’s have bottomed quite yet. However, they’re pretty clearly a lot closer to the bottom than the ritzier areas. The areas furthest from the city core have come down farther (San Marcos, East County, etc).
SDEngineer
Participant[quote=ybitz]Even in Mira Mesa (definitely not high end), the ratio seems to be over 200.
Ratio: 217
$1860 rent [craigslist]
http://sandiego.craigslist.org/csd/ap/1177483541.html
$404,500 price[zillow]
http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/11559-Polaris-Dr-San-Diego-CA-92126/16819385_zpid/Ratio: 211
$1900 rent [craigslist]
http://sandiego.craigslist.org/csd/apa/1177473494.html
price[zillow]
$401,500 price [zillow]
http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/7462-Dancy-Rd-San-Diego-CA-92126/16834149_zpid/And I thought the real estate bubble had burst in the non-high-end areas such as mira mesa. How come we’re not seeing ratios in the more reasonable 150 range?[/quote]
Zestimate is garbage. They’re pretty consistently well higher than what the market price is these days, and have been since the crash started – their model appears to be quite laggy.
If you’ll look on the MLS, you’ll find comparable area/size 4/2’s going in the 320-350ish range. The highest a 4/2 of that size has closed in the past couple of months is at 375K.
Here’s a close from 3/30 of this year – similar size, area (north of Mira Mesa Blvd), lot, and configuration. Sold for 325K.
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-090004996-8293_Calle_Calzada_San_Diego_Ca_92126
That takes it down to about 160-180x. Not investment territory, but not terrible.
But I don’t think MM’s SFR’s have bottomed quite yet. However, they’re pretty clearly a lot closer to the bottom than the ritzier areas. The areas furthest from the city core have come down farther (San Marcos, East County, etc).
-
AuthorPosts
