[sdduuuude]

[quote=Mark Holmes]…but anyone ignoring the macro-economic trends is just burying their head in the sand.[/quote]

I know, I know. My head spins every time I look at the economic indicators and the San Diego sales figures at the same time. They just don’t make sense. It’s nuts.

Sales are up over last year 4 months in a row. Orange County is seeing the same thing. There’s no denying there’s life in this housing market.

The timing of this whole mess is fascinating and very complex.

Maybe the Spring bounce sdr is expecting is happening now and the macro situation will take hold on the San Diego housing market before Spring. Maybe it won’t take hold until Fall. Who knows.

I’m just glad I’m not needing to buy for 5 years so I don’t really have to worry about the near-term timing. We decided to do my add-on in Clairemont and are under construction now. I’ll just do it on the cheap and sit tight.

Great thread.

[sdduuuude]

[quote=Mark Holmes]…but anyone ignoring the macro-economic trends is just burying their head in the sand.[/quote]

I know, I know. My head spins every time I look at the economic indicators and the San Diego sales figures at the same time. They just don’t make sense. It’s nuts.

Sales are up over last year 4 months in a row. Orange County is seeing the same thing. There’s no denying there’s life in this housing market.

The timing of this whole mess is fascinating and very complex.

Maybe the Spring bounce sdr is expecting is happening now and the macro situation will take hold on the San Diego housing market before Spring. Maybe it won’t take hold until Fall. Who knows.

I’m just glad I’m not needing to buy for 5 years so I don’t really have to worry about the near-term timing. We decided to do my add-on in Clairemont and are under construction now. I’ll just do it on the cheap and sit tight.

Great thread.

[sdduuuude]

[quote=Mark Holmes]…but anyone ignoring the macro-economic trends is just burying their head in the sand.[/quote]

I know, I know. My head spins every time I look at the economic indicators and the San Diego sales figures at the same time. They just don’t make sense. It’s nuts.

Sales are up over last year 4 months in a row. Orange County is seeing the same thing. There’s no denying there’s life in this housing market.

The timing of this whole mess is fascinating and very complex.

Maybe the Spring bounce sdr is expecting is happening now and the macro situation will take hold on the San Diego housing market before Spring. Maybe it won’t take hold until Fall. Who knows.

I’m just glad I’m not needing to buy for 5 years so I don’t really have to worry about the near-term timing. We decided to do my add-on in Clairemont and are under construction now. I’ll just do it on the cheap and sit tight.

Great thread.

[sdduuuude]

[quote=Mark Holmes]…but anyone ignoring the macro-economic trends is just burying their head in the sand.[/quote]

I know, I know. My head spins every time I look at the economic indicators and the San Diego sales figures at the same time. They just don’t make sense. It’s nuts.

Sales are up over last year 4 months in a row. Orange County is seeing the same thing. There’s no denying there’s life in this housing market.

The timing of this whole mess is fascinating and very complex.

Maybe the Spring bounce sdr is expecting is happening now and the macro situation will take hold on the San Diego housing market before Spring. Maybe it won’t take hold until Fall. Who knows.

I’m just glad I’m not needing to buy for 5 years so I don’t really have to worry about the near-term timing. We decided to do my add-on in Clairemont and are under construction now. I’ll just do it on the cheap and sit tight.

Great thread.

[sdduuuude]

I haven’t posted on this one yet but I have to say I have been reading and thinking about it all day.

I’ve poured a stiff drink and I’m going to write a long one that will tickle both sides of the argument and present a few ideas that are barely connected but not really say anything.

First off – I’m not so sure sdr has really stuck his neck out there too far. Why? There’s no numbers in his prediction. Sales will be “strong” not “over 5,000 in May.” Come next August as we are looking back on Spring, there will undoubtedly be arguments over whether or not it was “strong”, regardless what the numbers are.

Still, I value his perspective and it is an unexpected one and one I’m warming up to. Also, I’m taking notice because I expected “holy shit” this fall, which we got on Wall Street as I expected but not so much in the housing market. Sales are definitely up.

The distinction between strong sales and strong prices, though, is an important one. I mean – when the DOW is down on heavy trading, it is still down. Only the brokers are happy in that market, which is really what sdr is saying.

Something really striking about this housing market is the difference in behavior from neighborhood to neighborhood. I wish I had all day to dig into this and really understand the dynamics of each ‘hood and how hard Carmel Valley will get hit and when will Clairemont recover, and are condos really at a bottom now, but sadly I’m not one of the 10% unemployed and don’t have time. It would make a great research project for one econ prof’s students. Maybe he’ll offer me a teaching job and I’ll get right on it.

As I was thinking about this thread, ideas similar to TG’s post came to mind. 10% unemployment means 90% employment and that means plenty of buyers. It is a little more complicated than that, though. Housing is priced on the margin, so it is somewhat volatile. It takes relatively few distressed sellers to turn a market bad but it also takes relatively few well-funded buyers to send the market soaring. Maybe that is the hypothesis for the research project – a few well-funded buyers in the good neighborhoods, and a few distressed owners in the bad ‘hoods explain the dichotomy.

I say – if you haven’t mentioned a zip code in a prediction, you haven’t really made a prediction.

Another thing that strikes me about this housing market – and economics in general – is how slowly things move. In mid 2006, Roubini predicted a recession in Jan 2007. I said it would be Q1 2008, and that was even too soon. What really makes me nod when I read sdr’s observation and “prediction” is the fact that if he is right, it will drag the housing collapse out longer and longer. And that jives with my perception of a long, slow slide.

Now, it seems to me that most everyone is expecting prices to come down more in the next year and a half. Even sdr said prices “may even creep up a little in some markets” Could you be any more tentative in predicting a price increase ?

I’m thinking if sales are up now, yet we are still expecting prices to come down over the next 12 to 18 months, today’s buyers are just another group of future upside-down homeowners. Upside-down homeowners means more distressed sales, though they may not hit for another couple years.

As an aside – it seems to me that there has to be a “school district” bubble that pops one of these years. Right now, I think a clean, upgraded 3br/2bath 1,600 sq. ft home in Clairemont that is on a canyon, built in the early 60’s on a 7,000 sq. ft lot is worth about $530,000. In Carmel Valley (with no Mello Roos), about $850K. I have to believe that people will eventually decide that 300K for their kids to go to school in that district is too much.

From sdr’s post, I gather this as the bottom line – this market is dying hard.

But I think it is still dying. After the Spring bounce, the bloodshed has to continue, especially at the 600K – 1M range as businesses feel the pain of the macroeconomic environment. In short – I’m pushing all my expectations for price collapses in this range out another year.

I’m thrilled to be discussing real estate also.

[sdduuuude]

I haven’t posted on this one yet but I have to say I have been reading and thinking about it all day.

I’ve poured a stiff drink and I’m going to write a long one that will tickle both sides of the argument and present a few ideas that are barely connected but not really say anything.

First off – I’m not so sure sdr has really stuck his neck out there too far. Why? There’s no numbers in his prediction. Sales will be “strong” not “over 5,000 in May.” Come next August as we are looking back on Spring, there will undoubtedly be arguments over whether or not it was “strong”, regardless what the numbers are.

Still, I value his perspective and it is an unexpected one and one I’m warming up to. Also, I’m taking notice because I expected “holy shit” this fall, which we got on Wall Street as I expected but not so much in the housing market. Sales are definitely up.

The distinction between strong sales and strong prices, though, is an important one. I mean – when the DOW is down on heavy trading, it is still down. Only the brokers are happy in that market, which is really what sdr is saying.

Something really striking about this housing market is the difference in behavior from neighborhood to neighborhood. I wish I had all day to dig into this and really understand the dynamics of each ‘hood and how hard Carmel Valley will get hit and when will Clairemont recover, and are condos really at a bottom now, but sadly I’m not one of the 10% unemployed and don’t have time. It would make a great research project for one econ prof’s students. Maybe he’ll offer me a teaching job and I’ll get right on it.

As I was thinking about this thread, ideas similar to TG’s post came to mind. 10% unemployment means 90% employment and that means plenty of buyers. It is a little more complicated than that, though. Housing is priced on the margin, so it is somewhat volatile. It takes relatively few distressed sellers to turn a market bad but it also takes relatively few well-funded buyers to send the market soaring. Maybe that is the hypothesis for the research project – a few well-funded buyers in the good neighborhoods, and a few distressed owners in the bad ‘hoods explain the dichotomy.

I say – if you haven’t mentioned a zip code in a prediction, you haven’t really made a prediction.

Another thing that strikes me about this housing market – and economics in general – is how slowly things move. In mid 2006, Roubini predicted a recession in Jan 2007. I said it would be Q1 2008, and that was even too soon. What really makes me nod when I read sdr’s observation and “prediction” is the fact that if he is right, it will drag the housing collapse out longer and longer. And that jives with my perception of a long, slow slide.

Now, it seems to me that most everyone is expecting prices to come down more in the next year and a half. Even sdr said prices “may even creep up a little in some markets” Could you be any more tentative in predicting a price increase ?

I’m thinking if sales are up now, yet we are still expecting prices to come down over the next 12 to 18 months, today’s buyers are just another group of future upside-down homeowners. Upside-down homeowners means more distressed sales, though they may not hit for another couple years.

As an aside – it seems to me that there has to be a “school district” bubble that pops one of these years. Right now, I think a clean, upgraded 3br/2bath 1,600 sq. ft home in Clairemont that is on a canyon, built in the early 60’s on a 7,000 sq. ft lot is worth about $530,000. In Carmel Valley (with no Mello Roos), about $850K. I have to believe that people will eventually decide that 300K for their kids to go to school in that district is too much.

From sdr’s post, I gather this as the bottom line – this market is dying hard.

But I think it is still dying. After the Spring bounce, the bloodshed has to continue, especially at the 600K – 1M range as businesses feel the pain of the macroeconomic environment. In short – I’m pushing all my expectations for price collapses in this range out another year.

I’m thrilled to be discussing real estate also.

[sdduuuude]

I haven’t posted on this one yet but I have to say I have been reading and thinking about it all day.

I’ve poured a stiff drink and I’m going to write a long one that will tickle both sides of the argument and present a few ideas that are barely connected but not really say anything.

First off – I’m not so sure sdr has really stuck his neck out there too far. Why? There’s no numbers in his prediction. Sales will be “strong” not “over 5,000 in May.” Come next August as we are looking back on Spring, there will undoubtedly be arguments over whether or not it was “strong”, regardless what the numbers are.

Still, I value his perspective and it is an unexpected one and one I’m warming up to. Also, I’m taking notice because I expected “holy shit” this fall, which we got on Wall Street as I expected but not so much in the housing market. Sales are definitely up.

The distinction between strong sales and strong prices, though, is an important one. I mean – when the DOW is down on heavy trading, it is still down. Only the brokers are happy in that market, which is really what sdr is saying.

Something really striking about this housing market is the difference in behavior from neighborhood to neighborhood. I wish I had all day to dig into this and really understand the dynamics of each ‘hood and how hard Carmel Valley will get hit and when will Clairemont recover, and are condos really at a bottom now, but sadly I’m not one of the 10% unemployed and don’t have time. It would make a great research project for one econ prof’s students. Maybe he’ll offer me a teaching job and I’ll get right on it.

As I was thinking about this thread, ideas similar to TG’s post came to mind. 10% unemployment means 90% employment and that means plenty of buyers. It is a little more complicated than that, though. Housing is priced on the margin, so it is somewhat volatile. It takes relatively few distressed sellers to turn a market bad but it also takes relatively few well-funded buyers to send the market soaring. Maybe that is the hypothesis for the research project – a few well-funded buyers in the good neighborhoods, and a few distressed owners in the bad ‘hoods explain the dichotomy.

I say – if you haven’t mentioned a zip code in a prediction, you haven’t really made a prediction.

Another thing that strikes me about this housing market – and economics in general – is how slowly things move. In mid 2006, Roubini predicted a recession in Jan 2007. I said it would be Q1 2008, and that was even too soon. What really makes me nod when I read sdr’s observation and “prediction” is the fact that if he is right, it will drag the housing collapse out longer and longer. And that jives with my perception of a long, slow slide.

Now, it seems to me that most everyone is expecting prices to come down more in the next year and a half. Even sdr said prices “may even creep up a little in some markets” Could you be any more tentative in predicting a price increase ?

I’m thinking if sales are up now, yet we are still expecting prices to come down over the next 12 to 18 months, today’s buyers are just another group of future upside-down homeowners. Upside-down homeowners means more distressed sales, though they may not hit for another couple years.

As an aside – it seems to me that there has to be a “school district” bubble that pops one of these years. Right now, I think a clean, upgraded 3br/2bath 1,600 sq. ft home in Clairemont that is on a canyon, built in the early 60’s on a 7,000 sq. ft lot is worth about $530,000. In Carmel Valley (with no Mello Roos), about $850K. I have to believe that people will eventually decide that 300K for their kids to go to school in that district is too much.

From sdr’s post, I gather this as the bottom line – this market is dying hard.

But I think it is still dying. After the Spring bounce, the bloodshed has to continue, especially at the 600K – 1M range as businesses feel the pain of the macroeconomic environment. In short – I’m pushing all my expectations for price collapses in this range out another year.

I’m thrilled to be discussing real estate also.

[sdduuuude]

I haven’t posted on this one yet but I have to say I have been reading and thinking about it all day.

I’ve poured a stiff drink and I’m going to write a long one that will tickle both sides of the argument and present a few ideas that are barely connected but not really say anything.

First off – I’m not so sure sdr has really stuck his neck out there too far. Why? There’s no numbers in his prediction. Sales will be “strong” not “over 5,000 in May.” Come next August as we are looking back on Spring, there will undoubtedly be arguments over whether or not it was “strong”, regardless what the numbers are.

Still, I value his perspective and it is an unexpected one and one I’m warming up to. Also, I’m taking notice because I expected “holy shit” this fall, which we got on Wall Street as I expected but not so much in the housing market. Sales are definitely up.

The distinction between strong sales and strong prices, though, is an important one. I mean – when the DOW is down on heavy trading, it is still down. Only the brokers are happy in that market, which is really what sdr is saying.

Something really striking about this housing market is the difference in behavior from neighborhood to neighborhood. I wish I had all day to dig into this and really understand the dynamics of each ‘hood and how hard Carmel Valley will get hit and when will Clairemont recover, and are condos really at a bottom now, but sadly I’m not one of the 10% unemployed and don’t have time. It would make a great research project for one econ prof’s students. Maybe he’ll offer me a teaching job and I’ll get right on it.

As I was thinking about this thread, ideas similar to TG’s post came to mind. 10% unemployment means 90% employment and that means plenty of buyers. It is a little more complicated than that, though. Housing is priced on the margin, so it is somewhat volatile. It takes relatively few distressed sellers to turn a market bad but it also takes relatively few well-funded buyers to send the market soaring. Maybe that is the hypothesis for the research project – a few well-funded buyers in the good neighborhoods, and a few distressed owners in the bad ‘hoods explain the dichotomy.

I say – if you haven’t mentioned a zip code in a prediction, you haven’t really made a prediction.

Another thing that strikes me about this housing market – and economics in general – is how slowly things move. In mid 2006, Roubini predicted a recession in Jan 2007. I said it would be Q1 2008, and that was even too soon. What really makes me nod when I read sdr’s observation and “prediction” is the fact that if he is right, it will drag the housing collapse out longer and longer. And that jives with my perception of a long, slow slide.

Now, it seems to me that most everyone is expecting prices to come down more in the next year and a half. Even sdr said prices “may even creep up a little in some markets” Could you be any more tentative in predicting a price increase ?

I’m thinking if sales are up now, yet we are still expecting prices to come down over the next 12 to 18 months, today’s buyers are just another group of future upside-down homeowners. Upside-down homeowners means more distressed sales, though they may not hit for another couple years.

As an aside – it seems to me that there has to be a “school district” bubble that pops one of these years. Right now, I think a clean, upgraded 3br/2bath 1,600 sq. ft home in Clairemont that is on a canyon, built in the early 60’s on a 7,000 sq. ft lot is worth about $530,000. In Carmel Valley (with no Mello Roos), about $850K. I have to believe that people will eventually decide that 300K for their kids to go to school in that district is too much.

From sdr’s post, I gather this as the bottom line – this market is dying hard.

But I think it is still dying. After the Spring bounce, the bloodshed has to continue, especially at the 600K – 1M range as businesses feel the pain of the macroeconomic environment. In short – I’m pushing all my expectations for price collapses in this range out another year.

I’m thrilled to be discussing real estate also.

[sdduuuude]

I haven’t posted on this one yet but I have to say I have been reading and thinking about it all day.

I’ve poured a stiff drink and I’m going to write a long one that will tickle both sides of the argument and present a few ideas that are barely connected but not really say anything.

First off – I’m not so sure sdr has really stuck his neck out there too far. Why? There’s no numbers in his prediction. Sales will be “strong” not “over 5,000 in May.” Come next August as we are looking back on Spring, there will undoubtedly be arguments over whether or not it was “strong”, regardless what the numbers are.

Still, I value his perspective and it is an unexpected one and one I’m warming up to. Also, I’m taking notice because I expected “holy shit” this fall, which we got on Wall Street as I expected but not so much in the housing market. Sales are definitely up.

The distinction between strong sales and strong prices, though, is an important one. I mean – when the DOW is down on heavy trading, it is still down. Only the brokers are happy in that market, which is really what sdr is saying.

Something really striking about this housing market is the difference in behavior from neighborhood to neighborhood. I wish I had all day to dig into this and really understand the dynamics of each ‘hood and how hard Carmel Valley will get hit and when will Clairemont recover, and are condos really at a bottom now, but sadly I’m not one of the 10% unemployed and don’t have time. It would make a great research project for one econ prof’s students. Maybe he’ll offer me a teaching job and I’ll get right on it.

As I was thinking about this thread, ideas similar to TG’s post came to mind. 10% unemployment means 90% employment and that means plenty of buyers. It is a little more complicated than that, though. Housing is priced on the margin, so it is somewhat volatile. It takes relatively few distressed sellers to turn a market bad but it also takes relatively few well-funded buyers to send the market soaring. Maybe that is the hypothesis for the research project – a few well-funded buyers in the good neighborhoods, and a few distressed owners in the bad ‘hoods explain the dichotomy.

I say – if you haven’t mentioned a zip code in a prediction, you haven’t really made a prediction.

Another thing that strikes me about this housing market – and economics in general – is how slowly things move. In mid 2006, Roubini predicted a recession in Jan 2007. I said it would be Q1 2008, and that was even too soon. What really makes me nod when I read sdr’s observation and “prediction” is the fact that if he is right, it will drag the housing collapse out longer and longer. And that jives with my perception of a long, slow slide.

Now, it seems to me that most everyone is expecting prices to come down more in the next year and a half. Even sdr said prices “may even creep up a little in some markets” Could you be any more tentative in predicting a price increase ?

I’m thinking if sales are up now, yet we are still expecting prices to come down over the next 12 to 18 months, today’s buyers are just another group of future upside-down homeowners. Upside-down homeowners means more distressed sales, though they may not hit for another couple years.

As an aside – it seems to me that there has to be a “school district” bubble that pops one of these years. Right now, I think a clean, upgraded 3br/2bath 1,600 sq. ft home in Clairemont that is on a canyon, built in the early 60’s on a 7,000 sq. ft lot is worth about $530,000. In Carmel Valley (with no Mello Roos), about $850K. I have to believe that people will eventually decide that 300K for their kids to go to school in that district is too much.

From sdr’s post, I gather this as the bottom line – this market is dying hard.

But I think it is still dying. After the Spring bounce, the bloodshed has to continue, especially at the 600K – 1M range as businesses feel the pain of the macroeconomic environment. In short – I’m pushing all my expectations for price collapses in this range out another year.

I’m thrilled to be discussing real estate also.

[sdduuuude]

Thanks, fredo.

Another thing that happens is – too many OT threads take over the Active Forum Topics. There are only 20 spots.

If 20 people post great real-estate threads, then 10 people post stupid political threads, 10 of those great real-estate threads get bumped off the Active Forum topics list.

The fact that people respond to the political threads doesn’t, in fact, mean that they are interested in those political topics more than the 10 real-estate topics that were bumped off the screen. It just means that those 10 real estate topics were bumped off the screen by crap topics and are no longer readily available.

[sdduuuude]

Thanks, fredo.

Another thing that happens is – too many OT threads take over the Active Forum Topics. There are only 20 spots.

If 20 people post great real-estate threads, then 10 people post stupid political threads, 10 of those great real-estate threads get bumped off the Active Forum topics list.

The fact that people respond to the political threads doesn’t, in fact, mean that they are interested in those political topics more than the 10 real-estate topics that were bumped off the screen. It just means that those 10 real estate topics were bumped off the screen by crap topics and are no longer readily available.

[sdduuuude]

Thanks, fredo.

Another thing that happens is – too many OT threads take over the Active Forum Topics. There are only 20 spots.

If 20 people post great real-estate threads, then 10 people post stupid political threads, 10 of those great real-estate threads get bumped off the Active Forum topics list.

The fact that people respond to the political threads doesn’t, in fact, mean that they are interested in those political topics more than the 10 real-estate topics that were bumped off the screen. It just means that those 10 real estate topics were bumped off the screen by crap topics and are no longer readily available.

[sdduuuude]

Thanks, fredo.

Another thing that happens is – too many OT threads take over the Active Forum Topics. There are only 20 spots.

If 20 people post great real-estate threads, then 10 people post stupid political threads, 10 of those great real-estate threads get bumped off the Active Forum topics list.

The fact that people respond to the political threads doesn’t, in fact, mean that they are interested in those political topics more than the 10 real-estate topics that were bumped off the screen. It just means that those 10 real estate topics were bumped off the screen by crap topics and are no longer readily available.

[sdduuuude]

Thanks, fredo.

Another thing that happens is – too many OT threads take over the Active Forum Topics. There are only 20 spots.

If 20 people post great real-estate threads, then 10 people post stupid political threads, 10 of those great real-estate threads get bumped off the Active Forum topics list.

The fact that people respond to the political threads doesn’t, in fact, mean that they are interested in those political topics more than the 10 real-estate topics that were bumped off the screen. It just means that those 10 real estate topics were bumped off the screen by crap topics and are no longer readily available.

[sdduuuude]

Nice work, Rustico. Bump.

[Author]

Posts