Menu

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,156 through 1,170 (of 2,550 total)
1 2 3 … 77 78 79 … 168 169 170
  • Author
    Posts
  • October 13, 2009 at 4:16 PM in reply to: Prime Areas Collapse #469101
    sdcellar
    Participant

    Sure, but it’s possible that you meant they’d only take it so far (say to 85% of what it was). Now it’s certain you meant 100%.

    That said, I don’t see why you think I misunderstood you at a general level. I contend that they’re trying their best to keep things from getting worse. You contend that they’re trying to fully resucitate things. I said then (and now), that I don’t think that they’ll be successful with that.

    So where’s the disconnect?

    October 13, 2009 at 4:16 PM in reply to: Prime Areas Collapse #468277
    sdcellar
    Participant

    Oh, and for another example, I’m not sure SD Realtor meant to imply that they’re trying to re-inflate back to 2005/06 levels.

    So, SD Realtor, were you?

    October 13, 2009 at 4:16 PM in reply to: Prime Areas Collapse #468460
    sdcellar
    Participant

    Oh, and for another example, I’m not sure SD Realtor meant to imply that they’re trying to re-inflate back to 2005/06 levels.

    So, SD Realtor, were you?

    October 13, 2009 at 4:16 PM in reply to: Prime Areas Collapse #468820
    sdcellar
    Participant

    Oh, and for another example, I’m not sure SD Realtor meant to imply that they’re trying to re-inflate back to 2005/06 levels.

    So, SD Realtor, were you?

    October 13, 2009 at 4:16 PM in reply to: Prime Areas Collapse #468892
    sdcellar
    Participant

    Oh, and for another example, I’m not sure SD Realtor meant to imply that they’re trying to re-inflate back to 2005/06 levels.

    So, SD Realtor, were you?

    October 13, 2009 at 4:16 PM in reply to: Prime Areas Collapse #469106
    sdcellar
    Participant

    Oh, and for another example, I’m not sure SD Realtor meant to imply that they’re trying to re-inflate back to 2005/06 levels.

    So, SD Realtor, were you?

    October 13, 2009 at 3:43 PM in reply to: Prime Areas Collapse #468217
    sdcellar
    Participant

    So, just to be clear, you’re asserting that the government is trying to get us back to 2005/2006 pricing levels?

    October 13, 2009 at 3:43 PM in reply to: Prime Areas Collapse #468401
    sdcellar
    Participant

    So, just to be clear, you’re asserting that the government is trying to get us back to 2005/2006 pricing levels?

    October 13, 2009 at 3:43 PM in reply to: Prime Areas Collapse #468759
    sdcellar
    Participant

    So, just to be clear, you’re asserting that the government is trying to get us back to 2005/2006 pricing levels?

    October 13, 2009 at 3:43 PM in reply to: Prime Areas Collapse #468831
    sdcellar
    Participant

    So, just to be clear, you’re asserting that the government is trying to get us back to 2005/2006 pricing levels?

    October 13, 2009 at 3:43 PM in reply to: Prime Areas Collapse #469044
    sdcellar
    Participant

    So, just to be clear, you’re asserting that the government is trying to get us back to 2005/2006 pricing levels?

    October 13, 2009 at 12:15 PM in reply to: 4s Ranch and New Development #468138
    sdcellar
    Participant

    The 2200 square foot model looks to be a single level, so it would seem that the lots will still be pretty small for what’s on them.

    California West appears to be the same builder that did the Serramar development in the southern-most reaches of La Mesa.

    It’d be interesting to understand the financials behind them as well as the substance behind rumors regarding Fieldstone (and StanPac to a lesser extent).

    Getting builders back to shouldering more of the infrastructure costs would be great. M-R has become a bubble of it’s own sort, especially in PSD.

    October 13, 2009 at 12:15 PM in reply to: 4s Ranch and New Development #468321
    sdcellar
    Participant

    The 2200 square foot model looks to be a single level, so it would seem that the lots will still be pretty small for what’s on them.

    California West appears to be the same builder that did the Serramar development in the southern-most reaches of La Mesa.

    It’d be interesting to understand the financials behind them as well as the substance behind rumors regarding Fieldstone (and StanPac to a lesser extent).

    Getting builders back to shouldering more of the infrastructure costs would be great. M-R has become a bubble of it’s own sort, especially in PSD.

    October 13, 2009 at 12:15 PM in reply to: 4s Ranch and New Development #468679
    sdcellar
    Participant

    The 2200 square foot model looks to be a single level, so it would seem that the lots will still be pretty small for what’s on them.

    California West appears to be the same builder that did the Serramar development in the southern-most reaches of La Mesa.

    It’d be interesting to understand the financials behind them as well as the substance behind rumors regarding Fieldstone (and StanPac to a lesser extent).

    Getting builders back to shouldering more of the infrastructure costs would be great. M-R has become a bubble of it’s own sort, especially in PSD.

    October 13, 2009 at 12:15 PM in reply to: 4s Ranch and New Development #468751
    sdcellar
    Participant

    The 2200 square foot model looks to be a single level, so it would seem that the lots will still be pretty small for what’s on them.

    California West appears to be the same builder that did the Serramar development in the southern-most reaches of La Mesa.

    It’d be interesting to understand the financials behind them as well as the substance behind rumors regarding Fieldstone (and StanPac to a lesser extent).

    Getting builders back to shouldering more of the infrastructure costs would be great. M-R has become a bubble of it’s own sort, especially in PSD.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 15 posts - 1,156 through 1,170 (of 2,550 total)
1 2 3 … 77 78 79 … 168 169 170