Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
sdcellar
ParticipantYou’re so close to conventional, why don’t you set your sights just the slightest bit lower? You only described this house as “close to perfect”. Maybe “sacrifice” just the slightest bit more and not only would qualifying be easier, you’d actually be stretching yourself a little less thin. That said, the present doesn’t seem like the best time to be stretching oneself.
Also, when you say you’re at 50% of your income, are you talking gross or take home? I understand you’re reluctant to share too much detail, but if it should be the former, then no way you should buy this place. In my opinion, of course.
sdcellar
ParticipantYou’re so close to conventional, why don’t you set your sights just the slightest bit lower? You only described this house as “close to perfect”. Maybe “sacrifice” just the slightest bit more and not only would qualifying be easier, you’d actually be stretching yourself a little less thin. That said, the present doesn’t seem like the best time to be stretching oneself.
Also, when you say you’re at 50% of your income, are you talking gross or take home? I understand you’re reluctant to share too much detail, but if it should be the former, then no way you should buy this place. In my opinion, of course.
sdcellar
ParticipantYou’re so close to conventional, why don’t you set your sights just the slightest bit lower? You only described this house as “close to perfect”. Maybe “sacrifice” just the slightest bit more and not only would qualifying be easier, you’d actually be stretching yourself a little less thin. That said, the present doesn’t seem like the best time to be stretching oneself.
Also, when you say you’re at 50% of your income, are you talking gross or take home? I understand you’re reluctant to share too much detail, but if it should be the former, then no way you should buy this place. In my opinion, of course.
sdcellar
ParticipantYou’re so close to conventional, why don’t you set your sights just the slightest bit lower? You only described this house as “close to perfect”. Maybe “sacrifice” just the slightest bit more and not only would qualifying be easier, you’d actually be stretching yourself a little less thin. That said, the present doesn’t seem like the best time to be stretching oneself.
Also, when you say you’re at 50% of your income, are you talking gross or take home? I understand you’re reluctant to share too much detail, but if it should be the former, then no way you should buy this place. In my opinion, of course.
sdcellar
ParticipantYou’re so close to conventional, why don’t you set your sights just the slightest bit lower? You only described this house as “close to perfect”. Maybe “sacrifice” just the slightest bit more and not only would qualifying be easier, you’d actually be stretching yourself a little less thin. That said, the present doesn’t seem like the best time to be stretching oneself.
Also, when you say you’re at 50% of your income, are you talking gross or take home? I understand you’re reluctant to share too much detail, but if it should be the former, then no way you should buy this place. In my opinion, of course.
sdcellar
ParticipantI’d agree. If they get an inch, they’ll try to take a mile. Personally, I still don’t think even the PTB believes they can get things back to where they were, but with each bit of progress, even that is subject to re-assessment.
sdcellar
ParticipantI’d agree. If they get an inch, they’ll try to take a mile. Personally, I still don’t think even the PTB believes they can get things back to where they were, but with each bit of progress, even that is subject to re-assessment.
sdcellar
ParticipantI’d agree. If they get an inch, they’ll try to take a mile. Personally, I still don’t think even the PTB believes they can get things back to where they were, but with each bit of progress, even that is subject to re-assessment.
sdcellar
ParticipantI’d agree. If they get an inch, they’ll try to take a mile. Personally, I still don’t think even the PTB believes they can get things back to where they were, but with each bit of progress, even that is subject to re-assessment.
sdcellar
ParticipantI’d agree. If they get an inch, they’ll try to take a mile. Personally, I still don’t think even the PTB believes they can get things back to where they were, but with each bit of progress, even that is subject to re-assessment.
sdcellar
ParticipantSure, but it’s possible that you meant they’d only take it so far (say to 85% of what it was). Now it’s certain you meant 100%.
That said, I don’t see why you think I misunderstood you at a general level. I contend that they’re trying their best to keep things from getting worse. You contend that they’re trying to fully resucitate things. I said then (and now), that I don’t think that they’ll be successful with that.
So where’s the disconnect?
sdcellar
ParticipantSure, but it’s possible that you meant they’d only take it so far (say to 85% of what it was). Now it’s certain you meant 100%.
That said, I don’t see why you think I misunderstood you at a general level. I contend that they’re trying their best to keep things from getting worse. You contend that they’re trying to fully resucitate things. I said then (and now), that I don’t think that they’ll be successful with that.
So where’s the disconnect?
sdcellar
ParticipantSure, but it’s possible that you meant they’d only take it so far (say to 85% of what it was). Now it’s certain you meant 100%.
That said, I don’t see why you think I misunderstood you at a general level. I contend that they’re trying their best to keep things from getting worse. You contend that they’re trying to fully resucitate things. I said then (and now), that I don’t think that they’ll be successful with that.
So where’s the disconnect?
sdcellar
ParticipantSure, but it’s possible that you meant they’d only take it so far (say to 85% of what it was). Now it’s certain you meant 100%.
That said, I don’t see why you think I misunderstood you at a general level. I contend that they’re trying their best to keep things from getting worse. You contend that they’re trying to fully resucitate things. I said then (and now), that I don’t think that they’ll be successful with that.
So where’s the disconnect?
-
AuthorPosts
