[sdcellar]

Sounds like you’re interested in the plan four. Not sure your odds are great, but interest in Madeira seems to be dwindling, so maybe you have a shot. If you’re seriously considering Bridgewalk or Pasado, you may want to think about a plan three before either of those.

[sdcellar]

santeeman, um, compared to Sky Ranch, sure.

To answer AN’s question, over a million bucks.

Also, SRO, never meant to suggest you couldn’t be a homeowner as well. In homebuilder parlance, I believe you’d be referred to as a VIP.

[sdcellar]

santeeman, um, compared to Sky Ranch, sure.

To answer AN’s question, over a million bucks.

Also, SRO, never meant to suggest you couldn’t be a homeowner as well. In homebuilder parlance, I believe you’d be referred to as a VIP.

[sdcellar]

santeeman, um, compared to Sky Ranch, sure.

To answer AN’s question, over a million bucks.

Also, SRO, never meant to suggest you couldn’t be a homeowner as well. In homebuilder parlance, I believe you’d be referred to as a VIP.

[sdcellar]

santeeman, um, compared to Sky Ranch, sure.

To answer AN’s question, over a million bucks.

Also, SRO, never meant to suggest you couldn’t be a homeowner as well. In homebuilder parlance, I believe you’d be referred to as a VIP.

[sdcellar]

santeeman, um, compared to Sky Ranch, sure.

To answer AN’s question, over a million bucks.

Also, SRO, never meant to suggest you couldn’t be a homeowner as well. In homebuilder parlance, I believe you’d be referred to as a VIP.

[sdcellar]

As I understand it, the PhDs, math wizards and super duper computers (all one and the same, really) failed to look at property appreciation over a long enough (and distinct enough) period(s) of time.

Having worked with PhD/mathwizard/superdupercomputers, I can’t say I’m all that surprised. You’d be stunned how little common sense, much less scientfic method, can be applied by those who think they (and arguably should) know better.

Garbage in, garbage out. It’s an old axiom, but probably should be “explored” during the job interview process and at variuos junctures throughout said scientist’s career.

[sdcellar]

As I understand it, the PhDs, math wizards and super duper computers (all one and the same, really) failed to look at property appreciation over a long enough (and distinct enough) period(s) of time.

Having worked with PhD/mathwizard/superdupercomputers, I can’t say I’m all that surprised. You’d be stunned how little common sense, much less scientfic method, can be applied by those who think they (and arguably should) know better.

Garbage in, garbage out. It’s an old axiom, but probably should be “explored” during the job interview process and at variuos junctures throughout said scientist’s career.

[sdcellar]

As I understand it, the PhDs, math wizards and super duper computers (all one and the same, really) failed to look at property appreciation over a long enough (and distinct enough) period(s) of time.

Having worked with PhD/mathwizard/superdupercomputers, I can’t say I’m all that surprised. You’d be stunned how little common sense, much less scientfic method, can be applied by those who think they (and arguably should) know better.

Garbage in, garbage out. It’s an old axiom, but probably should be “explored” during the job interview process and at variuos junctures throughout said scientist’s career.

[sdcellar]

As I understand it, the PhDs, math wizards and super duper computers (all one and the same, really) failed to look at property appreciation over a long enough (and distinct enough) period(s) of time.

Having worked with PhD/mathwizard/superdupercomputers, I can’t say I’m all that surprised. You’d be stunned how little common sense, much less scientfic method, can be applied by those who think they (and arguably should) know better.

Garbage in, garbage out. It’s an old axiom, but probably should be “explored” during the job interview process and at variuos junctures throughout said scientist’s career.

[sdcellar]

As I understand it, the PhDs, math wizards and super duper computers (all one and the same, really) failed to look at property appreciation over a long enough (and distinct enough) period(s) of time.

Having worked with PhD/mathwizard/superdupercomputers, I can’t say I’m all that surprised. You’d be stunned how little common sense, much less scientfic method, can be applied by those who think they (and arguably should) know better.

Garbage in, garbage out. It’s an old axiom, but probably should be “explored” during the job interview process and at variuos junctures throughout said scientist’s career.

[sdcellar]

[quote=sdrealtor]I’m throwing a flag here! Stop the political threadjack. This is a question about the merits of installing solar systems on homes not Cap and Trade.[/quote]…and checking the capacity of the pump, might I add? Don’t we all win, left and right alike, if we use a little less energy in the first place? Let’s focus, people!

[sdcellar]

[quote=sdrealtor]I’m throwing a flag here! Stop the political threadjack. This is a question about the merits of installing solar systems on homes not Cap and Trade.[/quote]…and checking the capacity of the pump, might I add? Don’t we all win, left and right alike, if we use a little less energy in the first place? Let’s focus, people!

[sdcellar]

[quote=sdrealtor]I’m throwing a flag here! Stop the political threadjack. This is a question about the merits of installing solar systems on homes not Cap and Trade.[/quote]…and checking the capacity of the pump, might I add? Don’t we all win, left and right alike, if we use a little less energy in the first place? Let’s focus, people!

[sdcellar]

[quote=sdrealtor]I’m throwing a flag here! Stop the political threadjack. This is a question about the merits of installing solar systems on homes not Cap and Trade.[/quote]…and checking the capacity of the pump, might I add? Don’t we all win, left and right alike, if we use a little less energy in the first place? Let’s focus, people!

[Author]

Posts