Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
sdcellar
ParticipantSorry, but I don’t think it’s gotten *that* much nicer in the last 10 years. Cheap money is the significant driver.
ParticipantSorry, but I don’t think it’s gotten *that* much nicer in the last 10 years. Cheap money is the significant driver.
ParticipantSorry, but I don’t think it’s gotten *that* much nicer in the last 10 years. Cheap money is the significant driver.
ParticipantSorry, but I don’t think it’s gotten *that* much nicer in the last 10 years. Cheap money is the significant driver.
ParticipantSorry, but I don’t think it’s gotten *that* much nicer in the last 10 years. Cheap money is the significant driver.
Participant[quote=Nor-LA-SD-guy][quote=sdcellar]They just may have, but what makes you say that?[/quote]
Your title for this thread says it all,
“Buying a house at the new top of the market”[/quote]That’s at least what I was wondering to myself. Doesn’t mean I’m right about it.
Participant[quote=Nor-LA-SD-guy][quote=sdcellar]They just may have, but what makes you say that?[/quote]
Your title for this thread says it all,
“Buying a house at the new top of the market”[/quote]That’s at least what I was wondering to myself. Doesn’t mean I’m right about it.
Participant[quote=Nor-LA-SD-guy][quote=sdcellar]They just may have, but what makes you say that?[/quote]
Your title for this thread says it all,
“Buying a house at the new top of the market”[/quote]That’s at least what I was wondering to myself. Doesn’t mean I’m right about it.
Participant[quote=Nor-LA-SD-guy][quote=sdcellar]They just may have, but what makes you say that?[/quote]
Your title for this thread says it all,
“Buying a house at the new top of the market”[/quote]That’s at least what I was wondering to myself. Doesn’t mean I’m right about it.
Participant[quote=Nor-LA-SD-guy][quote=sdcellar]They just may have, but what makes you say that?[/quote]
Your title for this thread says it all,
“Buying a house at the new top of the market”[/quote]That’s at least what I was wondering to myself. Doesn’t mean I’m right about it.
Participantjpinpb– Exactly. You won’t hear me suggest San Diego hasn’t been expensive relative to rest of the country for at least as long as I’ve lived here (1978), but that wasn’t my point.
I was talking about this area relative to itself. Hell, this property relative to itself. It was $237 sq/ft. in 2000. By 2004 (a supposedly frothy time in the market, so I’ve been told), it was $502. And if it sells for what everybody seems to think FMV is, it’ll be $558.
Participantjpinpb– Exactly. You won’t hear me suggest San Diego hasn’t been expensive relative to rest of the country for at least as long as I’ve lived here (1978), but that wasn’t my point.
I was talking about this area relative to itself. Hell, this property relative to itself. It was $237 sq/ft. in 2000. By 2004 (a supposedly frothy time in the market, so I’ve been told), it was $502. And if it sells for what everybody seems to think FMV is, it’ll be $558.
Participantjpinpb– Exactly. You won’t hear me suggest San Diego hasn’t been expensive relative to rest of the country for at least as long as I’ve lived here (1978), but that wasn’t my point.
I was talking about this area relative to itself. Hell, this property relative to itself. It was $237 sq/ft. in 2000. By 2004 (a supposedly frothy time in the market, so I’ve been told), it was $502. And if it sells for what everybody seems to think FMV is, it’ll be $558.
Participantjpinpb– Exactly. You won’t hear me suggest San Diego hasn’t been expensive relative to rest of the country for at least as long as I’ve lived here (1978), but that wasn’t my point.
I was talking about this area relative to itself. Hell, this property relative to itself. It was $237 sq/ft. in 2000. By 2004 (a supposedly frothy time in the market, so I’ve been told), it was $502. And if it sells for what everybody seems to think FMV is, it’ll be $558.
-
AuthorPosts
