[sdcellar]

that and proximity to apartments, powerlines (worse on other side of street)

[sdcellar]

Not sure your point. I’d agree that half a mill is a lot of money. And you don’t get much land or house with that (or maybe even fries).

Which is it? Buy an overpriced underwhelming house now and hold on to it for a long time to get your money back, or better to save and get something better for your money later?

Me, I’ll take door number two. You, well, you’ve lost me.

[sdcellar]

Not sure your point. I’d agree that half a mill is a lot of money. And you don’t get much land or house with that (or maybe even fries).

Which is it? Buy an overpriced underwhelming house now and hold on to it for a long time to get your money back, or better to save and get something better for your money later?

Me, I’ll take door number two. You, well, you’ve lost me.

[sdcellar]

Not sure your point. I’d agree that half a mill is a lot of money. And you don’t get much land or house with that (or maybe even fries).

Which is it? Buy an overpriced underwhelming house now and hold on to it for a long time to get your money back, or better to save and get something better for your money later?

Me, I’ll take door number two. You, well, you’ve lost me.

[sdcellar]

Not sure your point. I’d agree that half a mill is a lot of money. And you don’t get much land or house with that (or maybe even fries).

Which is it? Buy an overpriced underwhelming house now and hold on to it for a long time to get your money back, or better to save and get something better for your money later?

Me, I’ll take door number two. You, well, you’ve lost me.

[sdcellar]

Not sure your point. I’d agree that half a mill is a lot of money. And you don’t get much land or house with that (or maybe even fries).

Which is it? Buy an overpriced underwhelming house now and hold on to it for a long time to get your money back, or better to save and get something better for your money later?

Me, I’ll take door number two. You, well, you’ve lost me.

[sdcellar]

Agree with your overall assessment of CV, New_Renter.

Lots of money in CV _to be sure_, but also plenty of folks of more ordinary means as well.

Sometimes it sounds like one can go dumpster diving for plasmas behind the Vons on Carmel Country, but that just ain’t quite the case.

It’ll be interesting to see how it plays out.

[sdcellar]

Agree with your overall assessment of CV, New_Renter.

Lots of money in CV _to be sure_, but also plenty of folks of more ordinary means as well.

Sometimes it sounds like one can go dumpster diving for plasmas behind the Vons on Carmel Country, but that just ain’t quite the case.

It’ll be interesting to see how it plays out.

[sdcellar]

Agree with your overall assessment of CV, New_Renter.

Lots of money in CV _to be sure_, but also plenty of folks of more ordinary means as well.

Sometimes it sounds like one can go dumpster diving for plasmas behind the Vons on Carmel Country, but that just ain’t quite the case.

It’ll be interesting to see how it plays out.

[sdcellar]

Agree with your overall assessment of CV, New_Renter.

Lots of money in CV _to be sure_, but also plenty of folks of more ordinary means as well.

Sometimes it sounds like one can go dumpster diving for plasmas behind the Vons on Carmel Country, but that just ain’t quite the case.

It’ll be interesting to see how it plays out.

[sdcellar]

Agree with your overall assessment of CV, New_Renter.

Lots of money in CV _to be sure_, but also plenty of folks of more ordinary means as well.

Sometimes it sounds like one can go dumpster diving for plasmas behind the Vons on Carmel Country, but that just ain’t quite the case.

It’ll be interesting to see how it plays out.

[sdcellar]

Aren’t most of the resets at risk based on initial teaser rates rather than market rates at time of origination?

Sure, rates are down a bit, but if your variable was originally based on market, the pending reset probably wasn’t going to break you anyway.

This has been posited a few times now, so I was just curious.

[sdcellar]

Aren’t most of the resets at risk based on initial teaser rates rather than market rates at time of origination?

Sure, rates are down a bit, but if your variable was originally based on market, the pending reset probably wasn’t going to break you anyway.

This has been posited a few times now, so I was just curious.

[sdcellar]

Aren’t most of the resets at risk based on initial teaser rates rather than market rates at time of origination?

Sure, rates are down a bit, but if your variable was originally based on market, the pending reset probably wasn’t going to break you anyway.

This has been posited a few times now, so I was just curious.

[sdcellar]

Aren’t most of the resets at risk based on initial teaser rates rather than market rates at time of origination?

Sure, rates are down a bit, but if your variable was originally based on market, the pending reset probably wasn’t going to break you anyway.

This has been posited a few times now, so I was just curious.

[Author]

Posts