Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
SD Realtor
Participantnybuyer it gets quite warm… The climate is similar to that of Cielo and the homes that are on the western face of the hills that are behind Lake Hodges. Not much sea breeze activity. Again, the sea breezes in San Siego die off pretty quickly. Sometimes you get some nice breezes up the canyons that finger off to the west but once more it is not a “coastal cool” that I am pretty sure you are referring to.
MR for Santa Monica are in the 6-7K range annually and a 230 HOA per month. Not cheap.
SD Realtor
Participantnybuyer it gets quite warm… The climate is similar to that of Cielo and the homes that are on the western face of the hills that are behind Lake Hodges. Not much sea breeze activity. Again, the sea breezes in San Siego die off pretty quickly. Sometimes you get some nice breezes up the canyons that finger off to the west but once more it is not a “coastal cool” that I am pretty sure you are referring to.
MR for Santa Monica are in the 6-7K range annually and a 230 HOA per month. Not cheap.
SD Realtor
Participantnybuyer it gets quite warm… The climate is similar to that of Cielo and the homes that are on the western face of the hills that are behind Lake Hodges. Not much sea breeze activity. Again, the sea breezes in San Siego die off pretty quickly. Sometimes you get some nice breezes up the canyons that finger off to the west but once more it is not a “coastal cool” that I am pretty sure you are referring to.
MR for Santa Monica are in the 6-7K range annually and a 230 HOA per month. Not cheap.
SD Realtor
Participantnybuyer it gets quite warm… The climate is similar to that of Cielo and the homes that are on the western face of the hills that are behind Lake Hodges. Not much sea breeze activity. Again, the sea breezes in San Siego die off pretty quickly. Sometimes you get some nice breezes up the canyons that finger off to the west but once more it is not a “coastal cool” that I am pretty sure you are referring to.
MR for Santa Monica are in the 6-7K range annually and a 230 HOA per month. Not cheap.
SD Realtor
ParticipantNo Santa Monica is not within the gates of Santa Luz… Kind of like, close but no cigar. Many agents who post Santa Monica listings actually put Santa Luz as the community.
A quick side note…
When an agent enters a listing in the MLS, all of the listing information is simply template driven. From an engineering standpoint the gui (user interface) is pretty pathetic. Given the bucks the realtor association has you would think they would deploy some decent technology but that is another story for another day. You simply pull down values from the template for pretty much all fields. The only areas you get to actually senter long strings of text is the remarks, confidential remarks, and supplemental comments. Other fields allow for text entry like room measurements, directions, and other similar fields.
One of the template pulldowns is for “community” and Santaluz is actually a value you can select. Now there is another field called “subdivision” where you can write in the subdivision of the home. So many agents will select the Santaluz community and write in the Santa Monica subdivision. Nothing bad about that but no Santa Monica is not in the gates on the course.
What area is Santa Monica considered? mmmm… well it is in 92127 which is Rancho Bernardo… it is close to Santa Luz… so I guess it really depends on who you talk to… If you talk to someone who lives IN Santaluz they will look down and say no you are not in Santaluz…
SD Realtor
ParticipantNo Santa Monica is not within the gates of Santa Luz… Kind of like, close but no cigar. Many agents who post Santa Monica listings actually put Santa Luz as the community.
A quick side note…
When an agent enters a listing in the MLS, all of the listing information is simply template driven. From an engineering standpoint the gui (user interface) is pretty pathetic. Given the bucks the realtor association has you would think they would deploy some decent technology but that is another story for another day. You simply pull down values from the template for pretty much all fields. The only areas you get to actually senter long strings of text is the remarks, confidential remarks, and supplemental comments. Other fields allow for text entry like room measurements, directions, and other similar fields.
One of the template pulldowns is for “community” and Santaluz is actually a value you can select. Now there is another field called “subdivision” where you can write in the subdivision of the home. So many agents will select the Santaluz community and write in the Santa Monica subdivision. Nothing bad about that but no Santa Monica is not in the gates on the course.
What area is Santa Monica considered? mmmm… well it is in 92127 which is Rancho Bernardo… it is close to Santa Luz… so I guess it really depends on who you talk to… If you talk to someone who lives IN Santaluz they will look down and say no you are not in Santaluz…
SD Realtor
ParticipantNo Santa Monica is not within the gates of Santa Luz… Kind of like, close but no cigar. Many agents who post Santa Monica listings actually put Santa Luz as the community.
A quick side note…
When an agent enters a listing in the MLS, all of the listing information is simply template driven. From an engineering standpoint the gui (user interface) is pretty pathetic. Given the bucks the realtor association has you would think they would deploy some decent technology but that is another story for another day. You simply pull down values from the template for pretty much all fields. The only areas you get to actually senter long strings of text is the remarks, confidential remarks, and supplemental comments. Other fields allow for text entry like room measurements, directions, and other similar fields.
One of the template pulldowns is for “community” and Santaluz is actually a value you can select. Now there is another field called “subdivision” where you can write in the subdivision of the home. So many agents will select the Santaluz community and write in the Santa Monica subdivision. Nothing bad about that but no Santa Monica is not in the gates on the course.
What area is Santa Monica considered? mmmm… well it is in 92127 which is Rancho Bernardo… it is close to Santa Luz… so I guess it really depends on who you talk to… If you talk to someone who lives IN Santaluz they will look down and say no you are not in Santaluz…
SD Realtor
ParticipantNo Santa Monica is not within the gates of Santa Luz… Kind of like, close but no cigar. Many agents who post Santa Monica listings actually put Santa Luz as the community.
A quick side note…
When an agent enters a listing in the MLS, all of the listing information is simply template driven. From an engineering standpoint the gui (user interface) is pretty pathetic. Given the bucks the realtor association has you would think they would deploy some decent technology but that is another story for another day. You simply pull down values from the template for pretty much all fields. The only areas you get to actually senter long strings of text is the remarks, confidential remarks, and supplemental comments. Other fields allow for text entry like room measurements, directions, and other similar fields.
One of the template pulldowns is for “community” and Santaluz is actually a value you can select. Now there is another field called “subdivision” where you can write in the subdivision of the home. So many agents will select the Santaluz community and write in the Santa Monica subdivision. Nothing bad about that but no Santa Monica is not in the gates on the course.
What area is Santa Monica considered? mmmm… well it is in 92127 which is Rancho Bernardo… it is close to Santa Luz… so I guess it really depends on who you talk to… If you talk to someone who lives IN Santaluz they will look down and say no you are not in Santaluz…
SD Realtor
ParticipantNo Santa Monica is not within the gates of Santa Luz… Kind of like, close but no cigar. Many agents who post Santa Monica listings actually put Santa Luz as the community.
A quick side note…
When an agent enters a listing in the MLS, all of the listing information is simply template driven. From an engineering standpoint the gui (user interface) is pretty pathetic. Given the bucks the realtor association has you would think they would deploy some decent technology but that is another story for another day. You simply pull down values from the template for pretty much all fields. The only areas you get to actually senter long strings of text is the remarks, confidential remarks, and supplemental comments. Other fields allow for text entry like room measurements, directions, and other similar fields.
One of the template pulldowns is for “community” and Santaluz is actually a value you can select. Now there is another field called “subdivision” where you can write in the subdivision of the home. So many agents will select the Santaluz community and write in the Santa Monica subdivision. Nothing bad about that but no Santa Monica is not in the gates on the course.
What area is Santa Monica considered? mmmm… well it is in 92127 which is Rancho Bernardo… it is close to Santa Luz… so I guess it really depends on who you talk to… If you talk to someone who lives IN Santaluz they will look down and say no you are not in Santaluz…
SD Realtor
ParticipantYeah we should. I noticed all the signs today as well. A few weeks ago the actives dropped down to 92 I believe and the active pending ratio was better then 2 to 1 which surprised me. As of the other day I think actives had crawled back up to 99. I would be more comfortable in the 120-130 range but don’t think we will hit that in Scripps this year. As long as the properties going into pendings dries up that will be good. Are you thinking new or old scripps?
SD Realtor
ParticipantYeah we should. I noticed all the signs today as well. A few weeks ago the actives dropped down to 92 I believe and the active pending ratio was better then 2 to 1 which surprised me. As of the other day I think actives had crawled back up to 99. I would be more comfortable in the 120-130 range but don’t think we will hit that in Scripps this year. As long as the properties going into pendings dries up that will be good. Are you thinking new or old scripps?
SD Realtor
ParticipantYeah we should. I noticed all the signs today as well. A few weeks ago the actives dropped down to 92 I believe and the active pending ratio was better then 2 to 1 which surprised me. As of the other day I think actives had crawled back up to 99. I would be more comfortable in the 120-130 range but don’t think we will hit that in Scripps this year. As long as the properties going into pendings dries up that will be good. Are you thinking new or old scripps?
SD Realtor
ParticipantYeah we should. I noticed all the signs today as well. A few weeks ago the actives dropped down to 92 I believe and the active pending ratio was better then 2 to 1 which surprised me. As of the other day I think actives had crawled back up to 99. I would be more comfortable in the 120-130 range but don’t think we will hit that in Scripps this year. As long as the properties going into pendings dries up that will be good. Are you thinking new or old scripps?
SD Realtor
ParticipantYeah we should. I noticed all the signs today as well. A few weeks ago the actives dropped down to 92 I believe and the active pending ratio was better then 2 to 1 which surprised me. As of the other day I think actives had crawled back up to 99. I would be more comfortable in the 120-130 range but don’t think we will hit that in Scripps this year. As long as the properties going into pendings dries up that will be good. Are you thinking new or old scripps?
SD Realtor
-
AuthorPosts