Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
SD Realtor
ParticipantArraya we absolutely agree on that… yes I would agree that as of about 2003 Wall Street and even companies like AIG knew that for sure it was a no lose bet. Either you win and make money or you lose and get bailed out. I am sure it was known that a few lambs would be sacrificied but it was still a great bet.
ParticipantArraya we absolutely agree on that… yes I would agree that as of about 2003 Wall Street and even companies like AIG knew that for sure it was a no lose bet. Either you win and make money or you lose and get bailed out. I am sure it was known that a few lambs would be sacrificied but it was still a great bet.
ParticipantArraya we absolutely agree on that… yes I would agree that as of about 2003 Wall Street and even companies like AIG knew that for sure it was a no lose bet. Either you win and make money or you lose and get bailed out. I am sure it was known that a few lambs would be sacrificied but it was still a great bet.
ParticipantI will try to find it.
Any Piggs recall the link to the rolling stones article about AIG? It was a thread all its own but a very nice writeup.
ParticipantI will try to find it.
Any Piggs recall the link to the rolling stones article about AIG? It was a thread all its own but a very nice writeup.
ParticipantI will try to find it.
Any Piggs recall the link to the rolling stones article about AIG? It was a thread all its own but a very nice writeup.
ParticipantI will try to find it.
Any Piggs recall the link to the rolling stones article about AIG? It was a thread all its own but a very nice writeup.
ParticipantI will try to find it.
Any Piggs recall the link to the rolling stones article about AIG? It was a thread all its own but a very nice writeup.
ParticipantExplained well uco. Did you read that Rolling Stone link that was posted awhile back on AIG? Sorry to trip the thread up. Anyways like I said, you explained it well.
ParticipantExplained well uco. Did you read that Rolling Stone link that was posted awhile back on AIG? Sorry to trip the thread up. Anyways like I said, you explained it well.
ParticipantExplained well uco. Did you read that Rolling Stone link that was posted awhile back on AIG? Sorry to trip the thread up. Anyways like I said, you explained it well.
ParticipantExplained well uco. Did you read that Rolling Stone link that was posted awhile back on AIG? Sorry to trip the thread up. Anyways like I said, you explained it well.
ParticipantExplained well uco. Did you read that Rolling Stone link that was posted awhile back on AIG? Sorry to trip the thread up. Anyways like I said, you explained it well.
ParticipantAnalyst I think alot of us would agree 100% with your assessment. Everything is quite surreal and in fact the more intervention there is, the harder it is to make an assessment of the current market, and the longer term outlook a few years down the road because one has to account for a greater period of unwinding.
It is tough and I am not sure what to believe anymore. My analysis now is very much confined to very very short term goals. I feel that the forces pushing down on the market are very strong. These are strong default numbers, heavy demographic problems and other natural forces. Similarly the forces that are reinflating are quite strong as well and should NEVER be underestimated as we have all seen.
Nonetheless I still believe it will be our creditors that will force our hands and then things will adjust more naturally, albeit in a higher interest rate environment.
-
AuthorPosts
