Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 15, 2007 at 11:52 AM in reply to: Home prices back to 2003 levels – according to the UT #99844November 15, 2007 at 11:52 AM in reply to: Home prices back to 2003 levels – according to the UT #99921
SD Realtor
ParticipantGuys I hate to trivialize this thread but isn’t it inconsequential what the macroscopic number is? I think we would all agree that location, housing type, desireability and such play a much greater role in the slope of the depreciation cycle and to lumpo socal as a whole is just plain misleading.
It does not matter and I contend it will lead to frustration if you even bother to factor the numbers in.
I like what people like Gary Sears do. He has pinpointed El Cajon condos and is dead focussed on that submarket. I am not saying that there is not an overall relationship between the housing submarkets as a whole. I know that, and bugs has posted that a million times. Yet I just think it is not a big deal to say prices in socal are at this level and such.
SD Realtor
November 15, 2007 at 11:52 AM in reply to: Home prices back to 2003 levels – according to the UT #99939SD Realtor
ParticipantGuys I hate to trivialize this thread but isn’t it inconsequential what the macroscopic number is? I think we would all agree that location, housing type, desireability and such play a much greater role in the slope of the depreciation cycle and to lumpo socal as a whole is just plain misleading.
It does not matter and I contend it will lead to frustration if you even bother to factor the numbers in.
I like what people like Gary Sears do. He has pinpointed El Cajon condos and is dead focussed on that submarket. I am not saying that there is not an overall relationship between the housing submarkets as a whole. I know that, and bugs has posted that a million times. Yet I just think it is not a big deal to say prices in socal are at this level and such.
SD Realtor
November 15, 2007 at 11:52 AM in reply to: Home prices back to 2003 levels – according to the UT #99950SD Realtor
ParticipantGuys I hate to trivialize this thread but isn’t it inconsequential what the macroscopic number is? I think we would all agree that location, housing type, desireability and such play a much greater role in the slope of the depreciation cycle and to lumpo socal as a whole is just plain misleading.
It does not matter and I contend it will lead to frustration if you even bother to factor the numbers in.
I like what people like Gary Sears do. He has pinpointed El Cajon condos and is dead focussed on that submarket. I am not saying that there is not an overall relationship between the housing submarkets as a whole. I know that, and bugs has posted that a million times. Yet I just think it is not a big deal to say prices in socal are at this level and such.
SD Realtor
November 15, 2007 at 11:52 AM in reply to: Home prices back to 2003 levels – according to the UT #99954SD Realtor
ParticipantGuys I hate to trivialize this thread but isn’t it inconsequential what the macroscopic number is? I think we would all agree that location, housing type, desireability and such play a much greater role in the slope of the depreciation cycle and to lumpo socal as a whole is just plain misleading.
It does not matter and I contend it will lead to frustration if you even bother to factor the numbers in.
I like what people like Gary Sears do. He has pinpointed El Cajon condos and is dead focussed on that submarket. I am not saying that there is not an overall relationship between the housing submarkets as a whole. I know that, and bugs has posted that a million times. Yet I just think it is not a big deal to say prices in socal are at this level and such.
SD Realtor
November 15, 2007 at 7:42 AM in reply to: Home prices back to 2003 levels – according to the UT #99696SD Realtor
ParticipantEven though the article was a typo or a snafu, in some parts of the county prices ARE back to 2003 levels for some types of housing.
SD Realtor
November 15, 2007 at 7:42 AM in reply to: Home prices back to 2003 levels – according to the UT #99770SD Realtor
ParticipantEven though the article was a typo or a snafu, in some parts of the county prices ARE back to 2003 levels for some types of housing.
SD Realtor
November 15, 2007 at 7:42 AM in reply to: Home prices back to 2003 levels – according to the UT #99787SD Realtor
ParticipantEven though the article was a typo or a snafu, in some parts of the county prices ARE back to 2003 levels for some types of housing.
SD Realtor
November 15, 2007 at 7:42 AM in reply to: Home prices back to 2003 levels – according to the UT #99800SD Realtor
ParticipantEven though the article was a typo or a snafu, in some parts of the county prices ARE back to 2003 levels for some types of housing.
SD Realtor
November 15, 2007 at 7:42 AM in reply to: Home prices back to 2003 levels – according to the UT #99806SD Realtor
ParticipantEven though the article was a typo or a snafu, in some parts of the county prices ARE back to 2003 levels for some types of housing.
SD Realtor
SD Realtor
ParticipantCoop I was just thinking about that the other day, (how much have we already reset). I am to lazy but I know there have been several posts over the past year or so that featured the infamous reset bar charts that went back sometime into maybe 2006. My total guess is that we are about 20% into the total… That is based on nothing but me sitting here drinking some grape juice and typing…
SD Realtor
SD Realtor
ParticipantCoop I was just thinking about that the other day, (how much have we already reset). I am to lazy but I know there have been several posts over the past year or so that featured the infamous reset bar charts that went back sometime into maybe 2006. My total guess is that we are about 20% into the total… That is based on nothing but me sitting here drinking some grape juice and typing…
SD Realtor
SD Realtor
ParticipantCoop I was just thinking about that the other day, (how much have we already reset). I am to lazy but I know there have been several posts over the past year or so that featured the infamous reset bar charts that went back sometime into maybe 2006. My total guess is that we are about 20% into the total… That is based on nothing but me sitting here drinking some grape juice and typing…
SD Realtor
SD Realtor
ParticipantCoop I was just thinking about that the other day, (how much have we already reset). I am to lazy but I know there have been several posts over the past year or so that featured the infamous reset bar charts that went back sometime into maybe 2006. My total guess is that we are about 20% into the total… That is based on nothing but me sitting here drinking some grape juice and typing…
SD Realtor
SD Realtor
ParticipantCoop I was just thinking about that the other day, (how much have we already reset). I am to lazy but I know there have been several posts over the past year or so that featured the infamous reset bar charts that went back sometime into maybe 2006. My total guess is that we are about 20% into the total… That is based on nothing but me sitting here drinking some grape juice and typing…
SD Realtor
-
AuthorPosts
