Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
SD Realtor
ParticipantArraya you have made alot of insightful posts on the subject and I could not agree more with them.
SD Realtor
ParticipantArraya you have made alot of insightful posts on the subject and I could not agree more with them.
SD Realtor
ParticipantArraya you have made alot of insightful posts on the subject and I could not agree more with them.
SD Realtor
ParticipantArraya you have made alot of insightful posts on the subject and I could not agree more with them.
SD Realtor
ParticipantI tell myself not to respond to these sorts of posts but I cannot help it.
I think you are missing the point.
Some of us such as myself are concerned that the recent bailouts as well as the future bailouts, lender workouts, as well as possible roll over and belly up behavior of the investors may indeed have a small effect on the depreciation cycle by reducing possible inventory.
That point of view differs between posters.
The ire about the entire situation is simple. Consumers are being rewarded for irresponsible consumption and lenders are being saved for poor if not vaporlike underwriting standards at time of origination. Furthermore not a penny of taxpayer money should be applied to ANY of this.
Do you think any of your taxpayer money should be used to either provide life support for a lender, or to subsidize an investor, or to assist in the workout of some chump making 40k a year living beyond his means?
It is not happening at the moment but is there a possibility it could happen?
SD Realtor
ParticipantI tell myself not to respond to these sorts of posts but I cannot help it.
I think you are missing the point.
Some of us such as myself are concerned that the recent bailouts as well as the future bailouts, lender workouts, as well as possible roll over and belly up behavior of the investors may indeed have a small effect on the depreciation cycle by reducing possible inventory.
That point of view differs between posters.
The ire about the entire situation is simple. Consumers are being rewarded for irresponsible consumption and lenders are being saved for poor if not vaporlike underwriting standards at time of origination. Furthermore not a penny of taxpayer money should be applied to ANY of this.
Do you think any of your taxpayer money should be used to either provide life support for a lender, or to subsidize an investor, or to assist in the workout of some chump making 40k a year living beyond his means?
It is not happening at the moment but is there a possibility it could happen?
SD Realtor
ParticipantI tell myself not to respond to these sorts of posts but I cannot help it.
I think you are missing the point.
Some of us such as myself are concerned that the recent bailouts as well as the future bailouts, lender workouts, as well as possible roll over and belly up behavior of the investors may indeed have a small effect on the depreciation cycle by reducing possible inventory.
That point of view differs between posters.
The ire about the entire situation is simple. Consumers are being rewarded for irresponsible consumption and lenders are being saved for poor if not vaporlike underwriting standards at time of origination. Furthermore not a penny of taxpayer money should be applied to ANY of this.
Do you think any of your taxpayer money should be used to either provide life support for a lender, or to subsidize an investor, or to assist in the workout of some chump making 40k a year living beyond his means?
It is not happening at the moment but is there a possibility it could happen?
SD Realtor
ParticipantI tell myself not to respond to these sorts of posts but I cannot help it.
I think you are missing the point.
Some of us such as myself are concerned that the recent bailouts as well as the future bailouts, lender workouts, as well as possible roll over and belly up behavior of the investors may indeed have a small effect on the depreciation cycle by reducing possible inventory.
That point of view differs between posters.
The ire about the entire situation is simple. Consumers are being rewarded for irresponsible consumption and lenders are being saved for poor if not vaporlike underwriting standards at time of origination. Furthermore not a penny of taxpayer money should be applied to ANY of this.
Do you think any of your taxpayer money should be used to either provide life support for a lender, or to subsidize an investor, or to assist in the workout of some chump making 40k a year living beyond his means?
It is not happening at the moment but is there a possibility it could happen?
SD Realtor
ParticipantI tell myself not to respond to these sorts of posts but I cannot help it.
I think you are missing the point.
Some of us such as myself are concerned that the recent bailouts as well as the future bailouts, lender workouts, as well as possible roll over and belly up behavior of the investors may indeed have a small effect on the depreciation cycle by reducing possible inventory.
That point of view differs between posters.
The ire about the entire situation is simple. Consumers are being rewarded for irresponsible consumption and lenders are being saved for poor if not vaporlike underwriting standards at time of origination. Furthermore not a penny of taxpayer money should be applied to ANY of this.
Do you think any of your taxpayer money should be used to either provide life support for a lender, or to subsidize an investor, or to assist in the workout of some chump making 40k a year living beyond his means?
It is not happening at the moment but is there a possibility it could happen?
SD Realtor
ParticipantI got to sneak out and play hockey today… the big conversation amongst the men was this bailout…lots of angst because this crew of guys are all pretty well educated and prudent… most are homeowners although some are renters. In all cases they are all fiscally responsible and everyone was pretty pissed off about the entire shmear…
I am sure you guys have all heard the infamous rumor about Paulson joining the Bush team for future immunity when it is found that GS hoodwinked investors… That one made me laugh today.
At any rate I couldn’t agree more about all of this being
a – about getting votes,
b – having nothing to do with helping people
c – most likely to be challenged by investors
d – not applicable to many people
e – not really having any major effect on the slideHowever as you all know it all does piss me off. Furthermore I think maybe perhaps the backlash to it is something I underestimated which is a very good thing.
Still I am worried about it and the future ploys, announcements, schemes… whatever you want to call them. As long as there are people like Dodd, Schumer, Hillary, Paulson, and others… there will be pandering to lowest common denominator.
SD Realtor
ParticipantI got to sneak out and play hockey today… the big conversation amongst the men was this bailout…lots of angst because this crew of guys are all pretty well educated and prudent… most are homeowners although some are renters. In all cases they are all fiscally responsible and everyone was pretty pissed off about the entire shmear…
I am sure you guys have all heard the infamous rumor about Paulson joining the Bush team for future immunity when it is found that GS hoodwinked investors… That one made me laugh today.
At any rate I couldn’t agree more about all of this being
a – about getting votes,
b – having nothing to do with helping people
c – most likely to be challenged by investors
d – not applicable to many people
e – not really having any major effect on the slideHowever as you all know it all does piss me off. Furthermore I think maybe perhaps the backlash to it is something I underestimated which is a very good thing.
Still I am worried about it and the future ploys, announcements, schemes… whatever you want to call them. As long as there are people like Dodd, Schumer, Hillary, Paulson, and others… there will be pandering to lowest common denominator.
SD Realtor
ParticipantI got to sneak out and play hockey today… the big conversation amongst the men was this bailout…lots of angst because this crew of guys are all pretty well educated and prudent… most are homeowners although some are renters. In all cases they are all fiscally responsible and everyone was pretty pissed off about the entire shmear…
I am sure you guys have all heard the infamous rumor about Paulson joining the Bush team for future immunity when it is found that GS hoodwinked investors… That one made me laugh today.
At any rate I couldn’t agree more about all of this being
a – about getting votes,
b – having nothing to do with helping people
c – most likely to be challenged by investors
d – not applicable to many people
e – not really having any major effect on the slideHowever as you all know it all does piss me off. Furthermore I think maybe perhaps the backlash to it is something I underestimated which is a very good thing.
Still I am worried about it and the future ploys, announcements, schemes… whatever you want to call them. As long as there are people like Dodd, Schumer, Hillary, Paulson, and others… there will be pandering to lowest common denominator.
SD Realtor
ParticipantI got to sneak out and play hockey today… the big conversation amongst the men was this bailout…lots of angst because this crew of guys are all pretty well educated and prudent… most are homeowners although some are renters. In all cases they are all fiscally responsible and everyone was pretty pissed off about the entire shmear…
I am sure you guys have all heard the infamous rumor about Paulson joining the Bush team for future immunity when it is found that GS hoodwinked investors… That one made me laugh today.
At any rate I couldn’t agree more about all of this being
a – about getting votes,
b – having nothing to do with helping people
c – most likely to be challenged by investors
d – not applicable to many people
e – not really having any major effect on the slideHowever as you all know it all does piss me off. Furthermore I think maybe perhaps the backlash to it is something I underestimated which is a very good thing.
Still I am worried about it and the future ploys, announcements, schemes… whatever you want to call them. As long as there are people like Dodd, Schumer, Hillary, Paulson, and others… there will be pandering to lowest common denominator.
SD Realtor
ParticipantI got to sneak out and play hockey today… the big conversation amongst the men was this bailout…lots of angst because this crew of guys are all pretty well educated and prudent… most are homeowners although some are renters. In all cases they are all fiscally responsible and everyone was pretty pissed off about the entire shmear…
I am sure you guys have all heard the infamous rumor about Paulson joining the Bush team for future immunity when it is found that GS hoodwinked investors… That one made me laugh today.
At any rate I couldn’t agree more about all of this being
a – about getting votes,
b – having nothing to do with helping people
c – most likely to be challenged by investors
d – not applicable to many people
e – not really having any major effect on the slideHowever as you all know it all does piss me off. Furthermore I think maybe perhaps the backlash to it is something I underestimated which is a very good thing.
Still I am worried about it and the future ploys, announcements, schemes… whatever you want to call them. As long as there are people like Dodd, Schumer, Hillary, Paulson, and others… there will be pandering to lowest common denominator.
SD Realtor
-
AuthorPosts
