Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
SD Realtor
ParticipantJWM did you talk to Frank Creed when you went to tech angels? I have known him for a long time and to be a good guy. Sorry they didn’t step up to fund you.
SD Realtor
SD Realtor
ParticipantJWM did you talk to Frank Creed when you went to tech angels? I have known him for a long time and to be a good guy. Sorry they didn’t step up to fund you.
SD Realtor
SD Realtor
ParticipantJWM did you talk to Frank Creed when you went to tech angels? I have known him for a long time and to be a good guy. Sorry they didn’t step up to fund you.
SD Realtor
SD Realtor
ParticipantJWM did you talk to Frank Creed when you went to tech angels? I have known him for a long time and to be a good guy. Sorry they didn’t step up to fund you.
SD Realtor
December 11, 2007 at 11:33 PM in reply to: Higher-end homes off the market – pulled or sold? #114796SD Realtor
ParticipantHi Amy –
Here is the lowdown on each property.
2914 currently in escrow at a list price of 1.25-1.395M. Unknown what the sales price is but we will know when it closes. Prior to this listing it was listed at 1.49M and expired after 48 days. Prior to that it was listed at 1.47 – 1.625M for 62 days and expired. Prior to that it was listed at 1.75M and was cancelled.
2934 currently in escrow at a list price of 1.375 – 1.475M.
Same story as 2914 with two expirations, one at 1.375-1.475M and prior to that one at 1.625-1.774. A cancellation before that when it was at 1.875.2944 closed escrow last week at 1.315M. Same history as the other two with two expirations at 1.295-1.425M, 1.54-1.69M
and a cancellation at 1.775M.Vianda expired on 12/1 at 1.9-2.2 and there were no prior expirations or cancellations on that listing.
Caudor has alot of history. It was cancelled on 11/5/07 at 1.7-1.9M. Prior to that it was cancelled back in 8/15/06 at
1.95-2.15 (it opened at 2.199M), then it was cancelled at 2.1 even back in 2/21/07, then cancelled again on 11/5/07 as said above. Also there is an expiration in there on 1/1/07 at 1.95-2.1. Owners bought it for 1.62M in 04.Hope this helps Amy. If you need any more info on listings just post them.
SD Realtor
December 11, 2007 at 11:33 PM in reply to: Higher-end homes off the market – pulled or sold? #114921SD Realtor
ParticipantHi Amy –
Here is the lowdown on each property.
2914 currently in escrow at a list price of 1.25-1.395M. Unknown what the sales price is but we will know when it closes. Prior to this listing it was listed at 1.49M and expired after 48 days. Prior to that it was listed at 1.47 – 1.625M for 62 days and expired. Prior to that it was listed at 1.75M and was cancelled.
2934 currently in escrow at a list price of 1.375 – 1.475M.
Same story as 2914 with two expirations, one at 1.375-1.475M and prior to that one at 1.625-1.774. A cancellation before that when it was at 1.875.2944 closed escrow last week at 1.315M. Same history as the other two with two expirations at 1.295-1.425M, 1.54-1.69M
and a cancellation at 1.775M.Vianda expired on 12/1 at 1.9-2.2 and there were no prior expirations or cancellations on that listing.
Caudor has alot of history. It was cancelled on 11/5/07 at 1.7-1.9M. Prior to that it was cancelled back in 8/15/06 at
1.95-2.15 (it opened at 2.199M), then it was cancelled at 2.1 even back in 2/21/07, then cancelled again on 11/5/07 as said above. Also there is an expiration in there on 1/1/07 at 1.95-2.1. Owners bought it for 1.62M in 04.Hope this helps Amy. If you need any more info on listings just post them.
SD Realtor
December 11, 2007 at 11:33 PM in reply to: Higher-end homes off the market – pulled or sold? #114957SD Realtor
ParticipantHi Amy –
Here is the lowdown on each property.
2914 currently in escrow at a list price of 1.25-1.395M. Unknown what the sales price is but we will know when it closes. Prior to this listing it was listed at 1.49M and expired after 48 days. Prior to that it was listed at 1.47 – 1.625M for 62 days and expired. Prior to that it was listed at 1.75M and was cancelled.
2934 currently in escrow at a list price of 1.375 – 1.475M.
Same story as 2914 with two expirations, one at 1.375-1.475M and prior to that one at 1.625-1.774. A cancellation before that when it was at 1.875.2944 closed escrow last week at 1.315M. Same history as the other two with two expirations at 1.295-1.425M, 1.54-1.69M
and a cancellation at 1.775M.Vianda expired on 12/1 at 1.9-2.2 and there were no prior expirations or cancellations on that listing.
Caudor has alot of history. It was cancelled on 11/5/07 at 1.7-1.9M. Prior to that it was cancelled back in 8/15/06 at
1.95-2.15 (it opened at 2.199M), then it was cancelled at 2.1 even back in 2/21/07, then cancelled again on 11/5/07 as said above. Also there is an expiration in there on 1/1/07 at 1.95-2.1. Owners bought it for 1.62M in 04.Hope this helps Amy. If you need any more info on listings just post them.
SD Realtor
December 11, 2007 at 11:33 PM in reply to: Higher-end homes off the market – pulled or sold? #114964SD Realtor
ParticipantHi Amy –
Here is the lowdown on each property.
2914 currently in escrow at a list price of 1.25-1.395M. Unknown what the sales price is but we will know when it closes. Prior to this listing it was listed at 1.49M and expired after 48 days. Prior to that it was listed at 1.47 – 1.625M for 62 days and expired. Prior to that it was listed at 1.75M and was cancelled.
2934 currently in escrow at a list price of 1.375 – 1.475M.
Same story as 2914 with two expirations, one at 1.375-1.475M and prior to that one at 1.625-1.774. A cancellation before that when it was at 1.875.2944 closed escrow last week at 1.315M. Same history as the other two with two expirations at 1.295-1.425M, 1.54-1.69M
and a cancellation at 1.775M.Vianda expired on 12/1 at 1.9-2.2 and there were no prior expirations or cancellations on that listing.
Caudor has alot of history. It was cancelled on 11/5/07 at 1.7-1.9M. Prior to that it was cancelled back in 8/15/06 at
1.95-2.15 (it opened at 2.199M), then it was cancelled at 2.1 even back in 2/21/07, then cancelled again on 11/5/07 as said above. Also there is an expiration in there on 1/1/07 at 1.95-2.1. Owners bought it for 1.62M in 04.Hope this helps Amy. If you need any more info on listings just post them.
SD Realtor
December 11, 2007 at 11:33 PM in reply to: Higher-end homes off the market – pulled or sold? #114999SD Realtor
ParticipantHi Amy –
Here is the lowdown on each property.
2914 currently in escrow at a list price of 1.25-1.395M. Unknown what the sales price is but we will know when it closes. Prior to this listing it was listed at 1.49M and expired after 48 days. Prior to that it was listed at 1.47 – 1.625M for 62 days and expired. Prior to that it was listed at 1.75M and was cancelled.
2934 currently in escrow at a list price of 1.375 – 1.475M.
Same story as 2914 with two expirations, one at 1.375-1.475M and prior to that one at 1.625-1.774. A cancellation before that when it was at 1.875.2944 closed escrow last week at 1.315M. Same history as the other two with two expirations at 1.295-1.425M, 1.54-1.69M
and a cancellation at 1.775M.Vianda expired on 12/1 at 1.9-2.2 and there were no prior expirations or cancellations on that listing.
Caudor has alot of history. It was cancelled on 11/5/07 at 1.7-1.9M. Prior to that it was cancelled back in 8/15/06 at
1.95-2.15 (it opened at 2.199M), then it was cancelled at 2.1 even back in 2/21/07, then cancelled again on 11/5/07 as said above. Also there is an expiration in there on 1/1/07 at 1.95-2.1. Owners bought it for 1.62M in 04.Hope this helps Amy. If you need any more info on listings just post them.
SD Realtor
SD Realtor
ParticipantI pretty much trust my own street smarts over anything that is reported by NAR and other associated organizations.
The past 6 months have, for me, been a crash course of how the industry really deals with distress. I have learned a great deal and anticipate that I will learn more. Over the past few months I have seen that both short sales and REO’s alike do indeed sit on offers. I would anticipate that in the case for short sales, the lack of response time is clearly due to staff shortages and a simple lack of motivation to take an official hit on the books.
Sellers may not be the only ones in denial eh? The investors know the hits are going to be made but much like the person who doesn’t like to look at thier etrade account after a bad run at the market, the investors are in no hurry to reconcile the values of thier shrinking investments. (This is all speculative)
Getting back to my point… I think that I have seen a bit of a surge in response times in the past 2 weeks from lenders regarding short sales and REO’s that I have been involved in. Maybe it is the fact they are just getting off the schnied or perhaps they are being big boys now and sucking it up. I will not be surprised at all to see a bit more of a surge in volume, with regards to lower end distressed properties here in town…
Over the past few weeks I have seen many a short and an reo go pending in both the central SD area and the south bay. Many of these were on the market for a few months. They did not all just now receive offers and go pending.
In no way do I attribute any of this activity to be a harbinger to the bottom. I feel it may be a combination of year end cleaning by the lenders but moreover a simple illustration of the pipeline finally starting to churn out results. I am still sticking to my position of this depreciation cycle being no different temporally then the prior, that we are still in year 2 and heading to 3, and that we will see cyclical rallies within the secular downtrend.
SD Realtor
SD Realtor
ParticipantI pretty much trust my own street smarts over anything that is reported by NAR and other associated organizations.
The past 6 months have, for me, been a crash course of how the industry really deals with distress. I have learned a great deal and anticipate that I will learn more. Over the past few months I have seen that both short sales and REO’s alike do indeed sit on offers. I would anticipate that in the case for short sales, the lack of response time is clearly due to staff shortages and a simple lack of motivation to take an official hit on the books.
Sellers may not be the only ones in denial eh? The investors know the hits are going to be made but much like the person who doesn’t like to look at thier etrade account after a bad run at the market, the investors are in no hurry to reconcile the values of thier shrinking investments. (This is all speculative)
Getting back to my point… I think that I have seen a bit of a surge in response times in the past 2 weeks from lenders regarding short sales and REO’s that I have been involved in. Maybe it is the fact they are just getting off the schnied or perhaps they are being big boys now and sucking it up. I will not be surprised at all to see a bit more of a surge in volume, with regards to lower end distressed properties here in town…
Over the past few weeks I have seen many a short and an reo go pending in both the central SD area and the south bay. Many of these were on the market for a few months. They did not all just now receive offers and go pending.
In no way do I attribute any of this activity to be a harbinger to the bottom. I feel it may be a combination of year end cleaning by the lenders but moreover a simple illustration of the pipeline finally starting to churn out results. I am still sticking to my position of this depreciation cycle being no different temporally then the prior, that we are still in year 2 and heading to 3, and that we will see cyclical rallies within the secular downtrend.
SD Realtor
SD Realtor
ParticipantI pretty much trust my own street smarts over anything that is reported by NAR and other associated organizations.
The past 6 months have, for me, been a crash course of how the industry really deals with distress. I have learned a great deal and anticipate that I will learn more. Over the past few months I have seen that both short sales and REO’s alike do indeed sit on offers. I would anticipate that in the case for short sales, the lack of response time is clearly due to staff shortages and a simple lack of motivation to take an official hit on the books.
Sellers may not be the only ones in denial eh? The investors know the hits are going to be made but much like the person who doesn’t like to look at thier etrade account after a bad run at the market, the investors are in no hurry to reconcile the values of thier shrinking investments. (This is all speculative)
Getting back to my point… I think that I have seen a bit of a surge in response times in the past 2 weeks from lenders regarding short sales and REO’s that I have been involved in. Maybe it is the fact they are just getting off the schnied or perhaps they are being big boys now and sucking it up. I will not be surprised at all to see a bit more of a surge in volume, with regards to lower end distressed properties here in town…
Over the past few weeks I have seen many a short and an reo go pending in both the central SD area and the south bay. Many of these were on the market for a few months. They did not all just now receive offers and go pending.
In no way do I attribute any of this activity to be a harbinger to the bottom. I feel it may be a combination of year end cleaning by the lenders but moreover a simple illustration of the pipeline finally starting to churn out results. I am still sticking to my position of this depreciation cycle being no different temporally then the prior, that we are still in year 2 and heading to 3, and that we will see cyclical rallies within the secular downtrend.
SD Realtor
SD Realtor
ParticipantI pretty much trust my own street smarts over anything that is reported by NAR and other associated organizations.
The past 6 months have, for me, been a crash course of how the industry really deals with distress. I have learned a great deal and anticipate that I will learn more. Over the past few months I have seen that both short sales and REO’s alike do indeed sit on offers. I would anticipate that in the case for short sales, the lack of response time is clearly due to staff shortages and a simple lack of motivation to take an official hit on the books.
Sellers may not be the only ones in denial eh? The investors know the hits are going to be made but much like the person who doesn’t like to look at thier etrade account after a bad run at the market, the investors are in no hurry to reconcile the values of thier shrinking investments. (This is all speculative)
Getting back to my point… I think that I have seen a bit of a surge in response times in the past 2 weeks from lenders regarding short sales and REO’s that I have been involved in. Maybe it is the fact they are just getting off the schnied or perhaps they are being big boys now and sucking it up. I will not be surprised at all to see a bit more of a surge in volume, with regards to lower end distressed properties here in town…
Over the past few weeks I have seen many a short and an reo go pending in both the central SD area and the south bay. Many of these were on the market for a few months. They did not all just now receive offers and go pending.
In no way do I attribute any of this activity to be a harbinger to the bottom. I feel it may be a combination of year end cleaning by the lenders but moreover a simple illustration of the pipeline finally starting to churn out results. I am still sticking to my position of this depreciation cycle being no different temporally then the prior, that we are still in year 2 and heading to 3, and that we will see cyclical rallies within the secular downtrend.
SD Realtor
SD Realtor
ParticipantI pretty much trust my own street smarts over anything that is reported by NAR and other associated organizations.
The past 6 months have, for me, been a crash course of how the industry really deals with distress. I have learned a great deal and anticipate that I will learn more. Over the past few months I have seen that both short sales and REO’s alike do indeed sit on offers. I would anticipate that in the case for short sales, the lack of response time is clearly due to staff shortages and a simple lack of motivation to take an official hit on the books.
Sellers may not be the only ones in denial eh? The investors know the hits are going to be made but much like the person who doesn’t like to look at thier etrade account after a bad run at the market, the investors are in no hurry to reconcile the values of thier shrinking investments. (This is all speculative)
Getting back to my point… I think that I have seen a bit of a surge in response times in the past 2 weeks from lenders regarding short sales and REO’s that I have been involved in. Maybe it is the fact they are just getting off the schnied or perhaps they are being big boys now and sucking it up. I will not be surprised at all to see a bit more of a surge in volume, with regards to lower end distressed properties here in town…
Over the past few weeks I have seen many a short and an reo go pending in both the central SD area and the south bay. Many of these were on the market for a few months. They did not all just now receive offers and go pending.
In no way do I attribute any of this activity to be a harbinger to the bottom. I feel it may be a combination of year end cleaning by the lenders but moreover a simple illustration of the pipeline finally starting to churn out results. I am still sticking to my position of this depreciation cycle being no different temporally then the prior, that we are still in year 2 and heading to 3, and that we will see cyclical rallies within the secular downtrend.
SD Realtor
-
AuthorPosts
