[Scarlett]

[quote=bearishgurl](…)I think there are and will be too many incoming students who are qualified and want to attend CA public universities when there are insufficient billets. Thus, they will have to go private or out of state if they want to work on a four-year degree. This could cause some parents to move to another state at least one-year prior to HS graduation to establish residency. Or move after HS graduation and their new graduate taking one year off to work. Out-of-state tuition cost 2.5 to 3 times as much as in-state tuition. It is needless to pay that if the parents can otherwise transfer in their job(s) or obtain a new one.[/quote]

I don’t think many parents now close(r) to the retirement (in their 50s) would up and go just for the kid to get residency in a certain state. Jobs for “older” people are harder to find too. So that leaves the kids having to borrow a boatload of money to pay for an out-of-state and/or private college.

Coming back to California – if there will be many more in-state QUALIFIED applicants, wouldn’t that translate in more money paid to the universities => more money to hire/expand teachers/classes etc.?

[Scarlett]

Anybody thinks college will become less of a requirement for a decent job? Given that in 10 years from now not that many people would even get a college degree?

What about the idea that companies/employers offer college graduates a minimum pay AND assume the college debt – IF the graduate stays with them for X (5?10?) years. (equivalent of mortgage I suppose). Indentured servitude.

[Scarlett]

Anybody thinks college will become less of a requirement for a decent job? Given that in 10 years from now not that many people would even get a college degree?

What about the idea that companies/employers offer college graduates a minimum pay AND assume the college debt – IF the graduate stays with them for X (5?10?) years. (equivalent of mortgage I suppose). Indentured servitude.

[Scarlett]

Anybody thinks college will become less of a requirement for a decent job? Given that in 10 years from now not that many people would even get a college degree?

What about the idea that companies/employers offer college graduates a minimum pay AND assume the college debt – IF the graduate stays with them for X (5?10?) years. (equivalent of mortgage I suppose). Indentured servitude.

[Scarlett]

Anybody thinks college will become less of a requirement for a decent job? Given that in 10 years from now not that many people would even get a college degree?

What about the idea that companies/employers offer college graduates a minimum pay AND assume the college debt – IF the graduate stays with them for X (5?10?) years. (equivalent of mortgage I suppose). Indentured servitude.

[Scarlett]

Anybody thinks college will become less of a requirement for a decent job? Given that in 10 years from now not that many people would even get a college degree?

What about the idea that companies/employers offer college graduates a minimum pay AND assume the college debt – IF the graduate stays with them for X (5?10?) years. (equivalent of mortgage I suppose). Indentured servitude.

[Scarlett]

La Jolla Farms might be out of the OP’s price range, but I don’t know for sure. They should also look at stuff around La Jolla Scenic Drive. That’s where my former UCSD boss (prof) lives.

Re:56 corridor – there is a price difference between Carmel valley/DelMar and PQ/4S/SabreSprings/Carmel Mtn Ranch. The latter is very attractive for worker bees that don’t have super high salaries and that have to commute to Sorrento area (or La Jolla like us). For those, yea, it’s a prime destination. But those are but a (smallish) segment of the RE buyers out there, and it’s driven a lot by the commute to one or two workplaces and somewhat by schools. If you work downtown 56 corridor is not a prime location. The buyers in the eastern part of 56 corridor area buying SFRs have probably incomes between 150 and 200K on average (not the current homeowners, who may have bought long time ago).

[Scarlett]

La Jolla Farms might be out of the OP’s price range, but I don’t know for sure. They should also look at stuff around La Jolla Scenic Drive. That’s where my former UCSD boss (prof) lives.

Re:56 corridor – there is a price difference between Carmel valley/DelMar and PQ/4S/SabreSprings/Carmel Mtn Ranch. The latter is very attractive for worker bees that don’t have super high salaries and that have to commute to Sorrento area (or La Jolla like us). For those, yea, it’s a prime destination. But those are but a (smallish) segment of the RE buyers out there, and it’s driven a lot by the commute to one or two workplaces and somewhat by schools. If you work downtown 56 corridor is not a prime location. The buyers in the eastern part of 56 corridor area buying SFRs have probably incomes between 150 and 200K on average (not the current homeowners, who may have bought long time ago).

[Scarlett]

La Jolla Farms might be out of the OP’s price range, but I don’t know for sure. They should also look at stuff around La Jolla Scenic Drive. That’s where my former UCSD boss (prof) lives.

Re:56 corridor – there is a price difference between Carmel valley/DelMar and PQ/4S/SabreSprings/Carmel Mtn Ranch. The latter is very attractive for worker bees that don’t have super high salaries and that have to commute to Sorrento area (or La Jolla like us). For those, yea, it’s a prime destination. But those are but a (smallish) segment of the RE buyers out there, and it’s driven a lot by the commute to one or two workplaces and somewhat by schools. If you work downtown 56 corridor is not a prime location. The buyers in the eastern part of 56 corridor area buying SFRs have probably incomes between 150 and 200K on average (not the current homeowners, who may have bought long time ago).

[Scarlett]

La Jolla Farms might be out of the OP’s price range, but I don’t know for sure. They should also look at stuff around La Jolla Scenic Drive. That’s where my former UCSD boss (prof) lives.

Re:56 corridor – there is a price difference between Carmel valley/DelMar and PQ/4S/SabreSprings/Carmel Mtn Ranch. The latter is very attractive for worker bees that don’t have super high salaries and that have to commute to Sorrento area (or La Jolla like us). For those, yea, it’s a prime destination. But those are but a (smallish) segment of the RE buyers out there, and it’s driven a lot by the commute to one or two workplaces and somewhat by schools. If you work downtown 56 corridor is not a prime location. The buyers in the eastern part of 56 corridor area buying SFRs have probably incomes between 150 and 200K on average (not the current homeowners, who may have bought long time ago).

[Scarlett]

La Jolla Farms might be out of the OP’s price range, but I don’t know for sure. They should also look at stuff around La Jolla Scenic Drive. That’s where my former UCSD boss (prof) lives.

Re:56 corridor – there is a price difference between Carmel valley/DelMar and PQ/4S/SabreSprings/Carmel Mtn Ranch. The latter is very attractive for worker bees that don’t have super high salaries and that have to commute to Sorrento area (or La Jolla like us). For those, yea, it’s a prime destination. But those are but a (smallish) segment of the RE buyers out there, and it’s driven a lot by the commute to one or two workplaces and somewhat by schools. If you work downtown 56 corridor is not a prime location. The buyers in the eastern part of 56 corridor area buying SFRs have probably incomes between 150 and 200K on average (not the current homeowners, who may have bought long time ago).

[Scarlett]

Back to the OP:

Currently, Title 8 of the U.S. Code fills in the gaps left by the Constitution.
Section 1401 defines the following as people who are “citizens of the United States at birth:”

• Anyone born inside the United States *
• Any Indian or Eskimo born in the United States, provided being a citizen of the U.S. does not impair the person’s status as a citizen of the tribe
• Any one born outside the United States, both of whose parents are citizens of the U.S., as long as one parent has lived in the U.S.
• Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year and the other parent is a U.S. national
• Any one born in a U.S. possession, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year
• Any one found in the U.S. under the age of five, whose parentage cannot be determined, as long as proof of non-citizenship is not provided by age 21
• Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is an alien and as long as the other parent is a citizen of the U.S. who lived in the U.S. for at least five years (with military and diplomatic service included in this time)
• A final, historical condition: a person born before 5/24/1934 of an alien father and a U.S. citizen mother who has lived in the U.S.
* There is an exception in the law — the person must be “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States. This would exempt the child of a diplomat, for example, from this provision.
Anyone falling into these categories is considered natural-born, and is eligible to run for President or Vice President. These provisions allow the children of military families to be considered natural-born, for example.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode08/usc_sec_08_00001401—-000-.html

[Scarlett]

Back to the OP:

Currently, Title 8 of the U.S. Code fills in the gaps left by the Constitution.
Section 1401 defines the following as people who are “citizens of the United States at birth:”

• Anyone born inside the United States *
• Any Indian or Eskimo born in the United States, provided being a citizen of the U.S. does not impair the person’s status as a citizen of the tribe
• Any one born outside the United States, both of whose parents are citizens of the U.S., as long as one parent has lived in the U.S.
• Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year and the other parent is a U.S. national
• Any one born in a U.S. possession, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year
• Any one found in the U.S. under the age of five, whose parentage cannot be determined, as long as proof of non-citizenship is not provided by age 21
• Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is an alien and as long as the other parent is a citizen of the U.S. who lived in the U.S. for at least five years (with military and diplomatic service included in this time)
• A final, historical condition: a person born before 5/24/1934 of an alien father and a U.S. citizen mother who has lived in the U.S.
* There is an exception in the law — the person must be “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States. This would exempt the child of a diplomat, for example, from this provision.
Anyone falling into these categories is considered natural-born, and is eligible to run for President or Vice President. These provisions allow the children of military families to be considered natural-born, for example.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode08/usc_sec_08_00001401—-000-.html

[Scarlett]

Back to the OP:

Currently, Title 8 of the U.S. Code fills in the gaps left by the Constitution.
Section 1401 defines the following as people who are “citizens of the United States at birth:”

• Anyone born inside the United States *
• Any Indian or Eskimo born in the United States, provided being a citizen of the U.S. does not impair the person’s status as a citizen of the tribe
• Any one born outside the United States, both of whose parents are citizens of the U.S., as long as one parent has lived in the U.S.
• Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year and the other parent is a U.S. national
• Any one born in a U.S. possession, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year
• Any one found in the U.S. under the age of five, whose parentage cannot be determined, as long as proof of non-citizenship is not provided by age 21
• Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is an alien and as long as the other parent is a citizen of the U.S. who lived in the U.S. for at least five years (with military and diplomatic service included in this time)
• A final, historical condition: a person born before 5/24/1934 of an alien father and a U.S. citizen mother who has lived in the U.S.
* There is an exception in the law — the person must be “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States. This would exempt the child of a diplomat, for example, from this provision.
Anyone falling into these categories is considered natural-born, and is eligible to run for President or Vice President. These provisions allow the children of military families to be considered natural-born, for example.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode08/usc_sec_08_00001401—-000-.html

[Scarlett]

Back to the OP:

Currently, Title 8 of the U.S. Code fills in the gaps left by the Constitution.
Section 1401 defines the following as people who are “citizens of the United States at birth:”

• Anyone born inside the United States *
• Any Indian or Eskimo born in the United States, provided being a citizen of the U.S. does not impair the person’s status as a citizen of the tribe
• Any one born outside the United States, both of whose parents are citizens of the U.S., as long as one parent has lived in the U.S.
• Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year and the other parent is a U.S. national
• Any one born in a U.S. possession, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year
• Any one found in the U.S. under the age of five, whose parentage cannot be determined, as long as proof of non-citizenship is not provided by age 21
• Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is an alien and as long as the other parent is a citizen of the U.S. who lived in the U.S. for at least five years (with military and diplomatic service included in this time)
• A final, historical condition: a person born before 5/24/1934 of an alien father and a U.S. citizen mother who has lived in the U.S.
* There is an exception in the law — the person must be “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States. This would exempt the child of a diplomat, for example, from this provision.
Anyone falling into these categories is considered natural-born, and is eligible to run for President or Vice President. These provisions allow the children of military families to be considered natural-born, for example.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode08/usc_sec_08_00001401—-000-.html

[Author]

Posts