Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Rt.66
ParticipantFair enough Russell, I WILL be back to grovel if I’m proved wrong, your are wrong about that.
I do not know where you get your data from but I will be correct and the realtor I was debating will be hideously wrong, of this I am VERY confident.Do you believe there is a phantom 2nds issue that will thwart a “significant amount” of the REO base? Do you believe the shadow inventory is “much” smaller than most believe, or is it probably bigger? If you want to appear all reasonable, but at the same time supporting the realtor then at least go on record agreeing with the realtor’s fallacies.
I never said no realtor ever contributes in a good way, from what I’ve seen SD Realtor (not to be confused with SDRealtor)is reasonable. All of them should be looked upon with extra skepticism no doubt, but completely unable to be reasonable? No.
Rt.66
ParticipantFair enough Russell, I WILL be back to grovel if I’m proved wrong, your are wrong about that.
I do not know where you get your data from but I will be correct and the realtor I was debating will be hideously wrong, of this I am VERY confident.Do you believe there is a phantom 2nds issue that will thwart a “significant amount” of the REO base? Do you believe the shadow inventory is “much” smaller than most believe, or is it probably bigger? If you want to appear all reasonable, but at the same time supporting the realtor then at least go on record agreeing with the realtor’s fallacies.
I never said no realtor ever contributes in a good way, from what I’ve seen SD Realtor (not to be confused with SDRealtor)is reasonable. All of them should be looked upon with extra skepticism no doubt, but completely unable to be reasonable? No.
Rt.66
ParticipantFair enough Russell, I WILL be back to grovel if I’m proved wrong, your are wrong about that.
I do not know where you get your data from but I will be correct and the realtor I was debating will be hideously wrong, of this I am VERY confident.Do you believe there is a phantom 2nds issue that will thwart a “significant amount” of the REO base? Do you believe the shadow inventory is “much” smaller than most believe, or is it probably bigger? If you want to appear all reasonable, but at the same time supporting the realtor then at least go on record agreeing with the realtor’s fallacies.
I never said no realtor ever contributes in a good way, from what I’ve seen SD Realtor (not to be confused with SDRealtor)is reasonable. All of them should be looked upon with extra skepticism no doubt, but completely unable to be reasonable? No.
Rt.66
ParticipantFair enough Russell, I WILL be back to grovel if I’m proved wrong, your are wrong about that.
I do not know where you get your data from but I will be correct and the realtor I was debating will be hideously wrong, of this I am VERY confident.Do you believe there is a phantom 2nds issue that will thwart a “significant amount” of the REO base? Do you believe the shadow inventory is “much” smaller than most believe, or is it probably bigger? If you want to appear all reasonable, but at the same time supporting the realtor then at least go on record agreeing with the realtor’s fallacies.
I never said no realtor ever contributes in a good way, from what I’ve seen SD Realtor (not to be confused with SDRealtor)is reasonable. All of them should be looked upon with extra skepticism no doubt, but completely unable to be reasonable? No.
Rt.66
ParticipantWell said Arraya and sensible.
TG you are class act, anyone reading your posts can see that (not saying you are always correct tho, the fat lady has yet to sing on our old debate).
When I read your posts I picture a 1960s Paul Newman behind the computer with a hot Woodward-esque chick on his lap, maybe even a cool pipe and smoking jacket. I have a feeling the debate you lost with SDRealtor has more to do with him having zero class and hitting below the belt than with actual facts.
Rt.66
ParticipantWell said Arraya and sensible.
TG you are class act, anyone reading your posts can see that (not saying you are always correct tho, the fat lady has yet to sing on our old debate).
When I read your posts I picture a 1960s Paul Newman behind the computer with a hot Woodward-esque chick on his lap, maybe even a cool pipe and smoking jacket. I have a feeling the debate you lost with SDRealtor has more to do with him having zero class and hitting below the belt than with actual facts.
Rt.66
ParticipantWell said Arraya and sensible.
TG you are class act, anyone reading your posts can see that (not saying you are always correct tho, the fat lady has yet to sing on our old debate).
When I read your posts I picture a 1960s Paul Newman behind the computer with a hot Woodward-esque chick on his lap, maybe even a cool pipe and smoking jacket. I have a feeling the debate you lost with SDRealtor has more to do with him having zero class and hitting below the belt than with actual facts.
Rt.66
ParticipantWell said Arraya and sensible.
TG you are class act, anyone reading your posts can see that (not saying you are always correct tho, the fat lady has yet to sing on our old debate).
When I read your posts I picture a 1960s Paul Newman behind the computer with a hot Woodward-esque chick on his lap, maybe even a cool pipe and smoking jacket. I have a feeling the debate you lost with SDRealtor has more to do with him having zero class and hitting below the belt than with actual facts.
Rt.66
ParticipantWell said Arraya and sensible.
TG you are class act, anyone reading your posts can see that (not saying you are always correct tho, the fat lady has yet to sing on our old debate).
When I read your posts I picture a 1960s Paul Newman behind the computer with a hot Woodward-esque chick on his lap, maybe even a cool pipe and smoking jacket. I have a feeling the debate you lost with SDRealtor has more to do with him having zero class and hitting below the belt than with actual facts.
Rt.66
ParticipantFunny thread title Arraya! LOL
Rt.66
ParticipantFunny thread title Arraya! LOL
Rt.66
ParticipantFunny thread title Arraya! LOL
Rt.66
ParticipantFunny thread title Arraya! LOL
Rt.66
ParticipantFunny thread title Arraya! LOL
-
AuthorPosts
