Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
robyns_song
ParticipantIf the listing says that it’s “basically a shell” (and knowing that listings like to sugar-coat things) why were you surprised to find it gutted? Also, the listing notes that the front of the house must remain…I’m not familiar with California historical designations or anything, but I would look into those things before thinking you can just demo a property and rebuild.
The listing explicitly states that the property is priced as land-only; if the property is gutted, why are you upset that the value is solely in the land? I’m guessing that your qualm is not that the value is placed in the land, but that the land is overpriced.
ParticipantIf the listing says that it’s “basically a shell” (and knowing that listings like to sugar-coat things) why were you surprised to find it gutted? Also, the listing notes that the front of the house must remain…I’m not familiar with California historical designations or anything, but I would look into those things before thinking you can just demo a property and rebuild.
The listing explicitly states that the property is priced as land-only; if the property is gutted, why are you upset that the value is solely in the land? I’m guessing that your qualm is not that the value is placed in the land, but that the land is overpriced.
ParticipantIf the listing says that it’s “basically a shell” (and knowing that listings like to sugar-coat things) why were you surprised to find it gutted? Also, the listing notes that the front of the house must remain…I’m not familiar with California historical designations or anything, but I would look into those things before thinking you can just demo a property and rebuild.
The listing explicitly states that the property is priced as land-only; if the property is gutted, why are you upset that the value is solely in the land? I’m guessing that your qualm is not that the value is placed in the land, but that the land is overpriced.
ParticipantIf the listing says that it’s “basically a shell” (and knowing that listings like to sugar-coat things) why were you surprised to find it gutted? Also, the listing notes that the front of the house must remain…I’m not familiar with California historical designations or anything, but I would look into those things before thinking you can just demo a property and rebuild.
The listing explicitly states that the property is priced as land-only; if the property is gutted, why are you upset that the value is solely in the land? I’m guessing that your qualm is not that the value is placed in the land, but that the land is overpriced.
February 27, 2008 at 7:34 PM in reply to: Permit numbers are falling rapidly, what about fire re-building? #161352ParticipantI was looking at some model homes and spoke with one lady who lost her house. She indicated she was caught up in the appraisal process–the insurance carrier thought the property was worth less than what was owed/insured for, so they only paid what it was worth, not the policy limit even though it was completely lost.
Anyway, she said that both she and her neighbors were going to rebuild, but it was taking months to come up with plans (they were all looking at model homes for ideas). My guess is that most of them are content renting while they come up with their house plans. The insurance companies usually pay for housing expenses for a certain period of time–maybe they are living this up.
February 27, 2008 at 7:34 PM in reply to: Permit numbers are falling rapidly, what about fire re-building? #161649ParticipantI was looking at some model homes and spoke with one lady who lost her house. She indicated she was caught up in the appraisal process–the insurance carrier thought the property was worth less than what was owed/insured for, so they only paid what it was worth, not the policy limit even though it was completely lost.
Anyway, she said that both she and her neighbors were going to rebuild, but it was taking months to come up with plans (they were all looking at model homes for ideas). My guess is that most of them are content renting while they come up with their house plans. The insurance companies usually pay for housing expenses for a certain period of time–maybe they are living this up.
February 27, 2008 at 7:34 PM in reply to: Permit numbers are falling rapidly, what about fire re-building? #161661ParticipantI was looking at some model homes and spoke with one lady who lost her house. She indicated she was caught up in the appraisal process–the insurance carrier thought the property was worth less than what was owed/insured for, so they only paid what it was worth, not the policy limit even though it was completely lost.
Anyway, she said that both she and her neighbors were going to rebuild, but it was taking months to come up with plans (they were all looking at model homes for ideas). My guess is that most of them are content renting while they come up with their house plans. The insurance companies usually pay for housing expenses for a certain period of time–maybe they are living this up.
February 27, 2008 at 7:34 PM in reply to: Permit numbers are falling rapidly, what about fire re-building? #161680ParticipantI was looking at some model homes and spoke with one lady who lost her house. She indicated she was caught up in the appraisal process–the insurance carrier thought the property was worth less than what was owed/insured for, so they only paid what it was worth, not the policy limit even though it was completely lost.
Anyway, she said that both she and her neighbors were going to rebuild, but it was taking months to come up with plans (they were all looking at model homes for ideas). My guess is that most of them are content renting while they come up with their house plans. The insurance companies usually pay for housing expenses for a certain period of time–maybe they are living this up.
February 27, 2008 at 7:34 PM in reply to: Permit numbers are falling rapidly, what about fire re-building? #161749ParticipantI was looking at some model homes and spoke with one lady who lost her house. She indicated she was caught up in the appraisal process–the insurance carrier thought the property was worth less than what was owed/insured for, so they only paid what it was worth, not the policy limit even though it was completely lost.
Anyway, she said that both she and her neighbors were going to rebuild, but it was taking months to come up with plans (they were all looking at model homes for ideas). My guess is that most of them are content renting while they come up with their house plans. The insurance companies usually pay for housing expenses for a certain period of time–maybe they are living this up.
ParticipantThe irony of the whole thing is that the guy is suing because what he considered to be his private life became public…what does he think is going to happen if he files a lawsuit? If he does, bring on the media.
ParticipantThe irony of the whole thing is that the guy is suing because what he considered to be his private life became public…what does he think is going to happen if he files a lawsuit? If he does, bring on the media.
ParticipantThe irony of the whole thing is that the guy is suing because what he considered to be his private life became public…what does he think is going to happen if he files a lawsuit? If he does, bring on the media.
ParticipantThe irony of the whole thing is that the guy is suing because what he considered to be his private life became public…what does he think is going to happen if he files a lawsuit? If he does, bring on the media.
ParticipantThe irony of the whole thing is that the guy is suing because what he considered to be his private life became public…what does he think is going to happen if he files a lawsuit? If he does, bring on the media.
-
AuthorPosts
