Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › 4656 North Ave
- This topic has 20 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 15 years ago by
jpinpb.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
March 2, 2008 at 7:53 PM #11979
-
March 2, 2008 at 9:38 PM #163438
robyns_song
ParticipantIf the listing says that it’s “basically a shell” (and knowing that listings like to sugar-coat things) why were you surprised to find it gutted? Also, the listing notes that the front of the house must remain…I’m not familiar with California historical designations or anything, but I would look into those things before thinking you can just demo a property and rebuild.
The listing explicitly states that the property is priced as land-only; if the property is gutted, why are you upset that the value is solely in the land? I’m guessing that your qualm is not that the value is placed in the land, but that the land is overpriced.
-
March 3, 2008 at 7:51 AM #163481
jpinpb
ParticipantYes, robyns. Looking back, that is what I had more issue with. I might even be able to deal w/someone saying a 7k parcel in University Heights is worth 500k, but when you have to add in the cost to demolish, then it’s a negative that in reality should be subtracted from what the land is worth. Thank you for understanding my little upset rant.
-
March 3, 2008 at 7:51 AM #163793
jpinpb
ParticipantYes, robyns. Looking back, that is what I had more issue with. I might even be able to deal w/someone saying a 7k parcel in University Heights is worth 500k, but when you have to add in the cost to demolish, then it’s a negative that in reality should be subtracted from what the land is worth. Thank you for understanding my little upset rant.
-
March 3, 2008 at 7:51 AM #163804
jpinpb
ParticipantYes, robyns. Looking back, that is what I had more issue with. I might even be able to deal w/someone saying a 7k parcel in University Heights is worth 500k, but when you have to add in the cost to demolish, then it’s a negative that in reality should be subtracted from what the land is worth. Thank you for understanding my little upset rant.
-
March 3, 2008 at 7:51 AM #163815
jpinpb
ParticipantYes, robyns. Looking back, that is what I had more issue with. I might even be able to deal w/someone saying a 7k parcel in University Heights is worth 500k, but when you have to add in the cost to demolish, then it’s a negative that in reality should be subtracted from what the land is worth. Thank you for understanding my little upset rant.
-
March 3, 2008 at 7:51 AM #163896
jpinpb
ParticipantYes, robyns. Looking back, that is what I had more issue with. I might even be able to deal w/someone saying a 7k parcel in University Heights is worth 500k, but when you have to add in the cost to demolish, then it’s a negative that in reality should be subtracted from what the land is worth. Thank you for understanding my little upset rant.
-
-
March 2, 2008 at 9:38 PM #163748
robyns_song
ParticipantIf the listing says that it’s “basically a shell” (and knowing that listings like to sugar-coat things) why were you surprised to find it gutted? Also, the listing notes that the front of the house must remain…I’m not familiar with California historical designations or anything, but I would look into those things before thinking you can just demo a property and rebuild.
The listing explicitly states that the property is priced as land-only; if the property is gutted, why are you upset that the value is solely in the land? I’m guessing that your qualm is not that the value is placed in the land, but that the land is overpriced.
-
March 2, 2008 at 9:38 PM #163759
robyns_song
ParticipantIf the listing says that it’s “basically a shell” (and knowing that listings like to sugar-coat things) why were you surprised to find it gutted? Also, the listing notes that the front of the house must remain…I’m not familiar with California historical designations or anything, but I would look into those things before thinking you can just demo a property and rebuild.
The listing explicitly states that the property is priced as land-only; if the property is gutted, why are you upset that the value is solely in the land? I’m guessing that your qualm is not that the value is placed in the land, but that the land is overpriced.
-
March 2, 2008 at 9:38 PM #163770
robyns_song
ParticipantIf the listing says that it’s “basically a shell” (and knowing that listings like to sugar-coat things) why were you surprised to find it gutted? Also, the listing notes that the front of the house must remain…I’m not familiar with California historical designations or anything, but I would look into those things before thinking you can just demo a property and rebuild.
The listing explicitly states that the property is priced as land-only; if the property is gutted, why are you upset that the value is solely in the land? I’m guessing that your qualm is not that the value is placed in the land, but that the land is overpriced.
-
March 2, 2008 at 9:38 PM #163853
robyns_song
ParticipantIf the listing says that it’s “basically a shell” (and knowing that listings like to sugar-coat things) why were you surprised to find it gutted? Also, the listing notes that the front of the house must remain…I’m not familiar with California historical designations or anything, but I would look into those things before thinking you can just demo a property and rebuild.
The listing explicitly states that the property is priced as land-only; if the property is gutted, why are you upset that the value is solely in the land? I’m guessing that your qualm is not that the value is placed in the land, but that the land is overpriced.
-
March 3, 2008 at 10:29 AM #163546
patientlywaiting
Participantjpinpb, you’re too emotional about wanting to own.
With this state of mind, you’ll make a mistake that you’ll regret.Stop looking at houses and focus on the economy and the upcoming recession and save cash. When you’re the only one with cash at the ready, that’ll be the time to buy.
Right now, people are still hoping for a Spring rebound, then up and up from there. So look at listings only for entertainment value. Don’t think you’ll find anything resembling a good deal out there.
-
March 3, 2008 at 10:38 AM #163551
jpinpb
ParticipantThanks patiently. I am eager and my butt is getting sore sitting on the fence. I get divided at times. Mentally I refuse to cave in to the high prices. Then I just get tired of waiting, hoping to find something doable. Must stick to plan and be patient.
-
March 3, 2008 at 10:38 AM #163863
jpinpb
ParticipantThanks patiently. I am eager and my butt is getting sore sitting on the fence. I get divided at times. Mentally I refuse to cave in to the high prices. Then I just get tired of waiting, hoping to find something doable. Must stick to plan and be patient.
-
March 3, 2008 at 10:38 AM #163875
jpinpb
ParticipantThanks patiently. I am eager and my butt is getting sore sitting on the fence. I get divided at times. Mentally I refuse to cave in to the high prices. Then I just get tired of waiting, hoping to find something doable. Must stick to plan and be patient.
-
March 3, 2008 at 10:38 AM #163885
jpinpb
ParticipantThanks patiently. I am eager and my butt is getting sore sitting on the fence. I get divided at times. Mentally I refuse to cave in to the high prices. Then I just get tired of waiting, hoping to find something doable. Must stick to plan and be patient.
-
March 3, 2008 at 10:38 AM #163966
jpinpb
ParticipantThanks patiently. I am eager and my butt is getting sore sitting on the fence. I get divided at times. Mentally I refuse to cave in to the high prices. Then I just get tired of waiting, hoping to find something doable. Must stick to plan and be patient.
-
-
March 3, 2008 at 10:29 AM #163857
patientlywaiting
Participantjpinpb, you’re too emotional about wanting to own.
With this state of mind, you’ll make a mistake that you’ll regret.Stop looking at houses and focus on the economy and the upcoming recession and save cash. When you’re the only one with cash at the ready, that’ll be the time to buy.
Right now, people are still hoping for a Spring rebound, then up and up from there. So look at listings only for entertainment value. Don’t think you’ll find anything resembling a good deal out there.
-
March 3, 2008 at 10:29 AM #163870
patientlywaiting
Participantjpinpb, you’re too emotional about wanting to own.
With this state of mind, you’ll make a mistake that you’ll regret.Stop looking at houses and focus on the economy and the upcoming recession and save cash. When you’re the only one with cash at the ready, that’ll be the time to buy.
Right now, people are still hoping for a Spring rebound, then up and up from there. So look at listings only for entertainment value. Don’t think you’ll find anything resembling a good deal out there.
-
March 3, 2008 at 10:29 AM #163879
patientlywaiting
Participantjpinpb, you’re too emotional about wanting to own.
With this state of mind, you’ll make a mistake that you’ll regret.Stop looking at houses and focus on the economy and the upcoming recession and save cash. When you’re the only one with cash at the ready, that’ll be the time to buy.
Right now, people are still hoping for a Spring rebound, then up and up from there. So look at listings only for entertainment value. Don’t think you’ll find anything resembling a good deal out there.
-
March 3, 2008 at 10:29 AM #163961
patientlywaiting
Participantjpinpb, you’re too emotional about wanting to own.
With this state of mind, you’ll make a mistake that you’ll regret.Stop looking at houses and focus on the economy and the upcoming recession and save cash. When you’re the only one with cash at the ready, that’ll be the time to buy.
Right now, people are still hoping for a Spring rebound, then up and up from there. So look at listings only for entertainment value. Don’t think you’ll find anything resembling a good deal out there.
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.