Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Rich ToscanoKeymaster[quote=ILoveRegulation]
Just quoting this so you can’t change it. I’ve emailed Rich to see if he will ban you.[/quote]
Yes ILoveRegulation, I got your message, in which you asked:
“Is this worthy of a banishment or is flu one of the privileged posters who is above the rules?”
Those with reading comprehension skills will notice that you implicitly accused me of allowing “privileged users” to operate “above the rules.”
That is pretty funny coming from a user whose handle is 16 hours old.
If you are truly a new user, what is it that makes you think that you can lecture me about the site rules? You clearly have no idea what they are. I have never made rules on profanity or insults — the sole “rule” applies to political threadjacking as outlined here:
http://piggington.com/threadjackers_will_be_persecuted_maybe_even_prosecuted?page=4
If you are not as new to the forum as your 16-hour-old handle would imply, then are you one of these serial threadjackers who occasionally creates a new account with a vaguely provocative username just to start flame wars?
If it’s the latter, I would read above linked post very carefully.
If it’s the former, then welcome… but in the future, please don’t waste my time with semi-insulting requests to intervene just because someone offended your delicate sensibilities.
Rich
Rich ToscanoKeymaster[quote=ILoveRegulation]
Just quoting this so you can’t change it. I’ve emailed Rich to see if he will ban you.[/quote]
Yes ILoveRegulation, I got your message, in which you asked:
“Is this worthy of a banishment or is flu one of the privileged posters who is above the rules?”
Those with reading comprehension skills will notice that you implicitly accused me of allowing “privileged users” to operate “above the rules.”
That is pretty funny coming from a user whose handle is 16 hours old.
If you are truly a new user, what is it that makes you think that you can lecture me about the site rules? You clearly have no idea what they are. I have never made rules on profanity or insults — the sole “rule” applies to political threadjacking as outlined here:
http://piggington.com/threadjackers_will_be_persecuted_maybe_even_prosecuted?page=4
If you are not as new to the forum as your 16-hour-old handle would imply, then are you one of these serial threadjackers who occasionally creates a new account with a vaguely provocative username just to start flame wars?
If it’s the latter, I would read above linked post very carefully.
If it’s the former, then welcome… but in the future, please don’t waste my time with semi-insulting requests to intervene just because someone offended your delicate sensibilities.
Rich
Rich ToscanoKeymaster[quote=ILoveRegulation]
Just quoting this so you can’t change it. I’ve emailed Rich to see if he will ban you.[/quote]
Yes ILoveRegulation, I got your message, in which you asked:
“Is this worthy of a banishment or is flu one of the privileged posters who is above the rules?”
Those with reading comprehension skills will notice that you implicitly accused me of allowing “privileged users” to operate “above the rules.”
That is pretty funny coming from a user whose handle is 16 hours old.
If you are truly a new user, what is it that makes you think that you can lecture me about the site rules? You clearly have no idea what they are. I have never made rules on profanity or insults — the sole “rule” applies to political threadjacking as outlined here:
http://piggington.com/threadjackers_will_be_persecuted_maybe_even_prosecuted?page=4
If you are not as new to the forum as your 16-hour-old handle would imply, then are you one of these serial threadjackers who occasionally creates a new account with a vaguely provocative username just to start flame wars?
If it’s the latter, I would read above linked post very carefully.
If it’s the former, then welcome… but in the future, please don’t waste my time with semi-insulting requests to intervene just because someone offended your delicate sensibilities.
Rich
Rich ToscanoKeymaster[quote=briansd1]How about when the government bails out private pensions?
Don’t you think that the value of the your 401k has been help up by Federal action?[/quote]
In the short term, yes.
In the long term (the timeline that matters), absolutely not.
Rich ToscanoKeymaster[quote=briansd1]How about when the government bails out private pensions?
Don’t you think that the value of the your 401k has been help up by Federal action?[/quote]
In the short term, yes.
In the long term (the timeline that matters), absolutely not.
Rich ToscanoKeymaster[quote=briansd1]How about when the government bails out private pensions?
Don’t you think that the value of the your 401k has been help up by Federal action?[/quote]
In the short term, yes.
In the long term (the timeline that matters), absolutely not.
Rich ToscanoKeymaster[quote=briansd1]How about when the government bails out private pensions?
Don’t you think that the value of the your 401k has been help up by Federal action?[/quote]
In the short term, yes.
In the long term (the timeline that matters), absolutely not.
Rich ToscanoKeymaster[quote=briansd1]How about when the government bails out private pensions?
Don’t you think that the value of the your 401k has been help up by Federal action?[/quote]
In the short term, yes.
In the long term (the timeline that matters), absolutely not.
Rich ToscanoKeymasterI would be very surprised if we ever hit the peak in INCOME-adjusted terms again. Just think how ridiculously expensive homes got compared to incomes, and what it took (lending wise) to get them there… why would that happen again?
Inflation adjusted is a little different since incomes can rise faster than inflation. But still. That’s a long way off, if ever.
I certainly don’t consider it “pessimistic” to say that we will never hit the inflation adjusted high. That was a terrible affair, in which homes were totally unaffordable and people had to take on huge debt just to buy a place to live. It seemed fun because people were profiting off the rise from expensive to really expensive… but hugely expensive housing is certainly not a desirable outcome.
Rich ToscanoKeymasterI would be very surprised if we ever hit the peak in INCOME-adjusted terms again. Just think how ridiculously expensive homes got compared to incomes, and what it took (lending wise) to get them there… why would that happen again?
Inflation adjusted is a little different since incomes can rise faster than inflation. But still. That’s a long way off, if ever.
I certainly don’t consider it “pessimistic” to say that we will never hit the inflation adjusted high. That was a terrible affair, in which homes were totally unaffordable and people had to take on huge debt just to buy a place to live. It seemed fun because people were profiting off the rise from expensive to really expensive… but hugely expensive housing is certainly not a desirable outcome.
Rich ToscanoKeymasterI would be very surprised if we ever hit the peak in INCOME-adjusted terms again. Just think how ridiculously expensive homes got compared to incomes, and what it took (lending wise) to get them there… why would that happen again?
Inflation adjusted is a little different since incomes can rise faster than inflation. But still. That’s a long way off, if ever.
I certainly don’t consider it “pessimistic” to say that we will never hit the inflation adjusted high. That was a terrible affair, in which homes were totally unaffordable and people had to take on huge debt just to buy a place to live. It seemed fun because people were profiting off the rise from expensive to really expensive… but hugely expensive housing is certainly not a desirable outcome.
Rich ToscanoKeymasterI would be very surprised if we ever hit the peak in INCOME-adjusted terms again. Just think how ridiculously expensive homes got compared to incomes, and what it took (lending wise) to get them there… why would that happen again?
Inflation adjusted is a little different since incomes can rise faster than inflation. But still. That’s a long way off, if ever.
I certainly don’t consider it “pessimistic” to say that we will never hit the inflation adjusted high. That was a terrible affair, in which homes were totally unaffordable and people had to take on huge debt just to buy a place to live. It seemed fun because people were profiting off the rise from expensive to really expensive… but hugely expensive housing is certainly not a desirable outcome.
Rich ToscanoKeymasterI would be very surprised if we ever hit the peak in INCOME-adjusted terms again. Just think how ridiculously expensive homes got compared to incomes, and what it took (lending wise) to get them there… why would that happen again?
Inflation adjusted is a little different since incomes can rise faster than inflation. But still. That’s a long way off, if ever.
I certainly don’t consider it “pessimistic” to say that we will never hit the inflation adjusted high. That was a terrible affair, in which homes were totally unaffordable and people had to take on huge debt just to buy a place to live. It seemed fun because people were profiting off the rise from expensive to really expensive… but hugely expensive housing is certainly not a desirable outcome.
Rich ToscanoKeymasterTucker Carlson has been under a lot of pressure too, from a series of over-enthusiastically cinched bow ties.
-
AuthorPosts
