Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Rich ToscanoKeymaster[quote=bearishgurl][quote=LuckyInOC]PS: I just realized the spell checker on this site does not understand ‘affordability’ – kind of ironic when most of the users do…[/quote]
There’s a spell-checker on this site??[/quote]
No… if there’s any spell checking taking place your browser is doing it.
Rich ToscanoKeymaster[quote=bearishgurl][quote=LuckyInOC]PS: I just realized the spell checker on this site does not understand ‘affordability’ – kind of ironic when most of the users do…[/quote]
There’s a spell-checker on this site??[/quote]
No… if there’s any spell checking taking place your browser is doing it.
Rich ToscanoKeymaster[quote=bearishgurl][quote=LuckyInOC]PS: I just realized the spell checker on this site does not understand ‘affordability’ – kind of ironic when most of the users do…[/quote]
There’s a spell-checker on this site??[/quote]
No… if there’s any spell checking taking place your browser is doing it.
June 11, 2010 at 7:50 PM in reply to: Threadjackers Will Be Persecuted (Maybe Even Prosecuted) #563051
Rich ToscanoKeymasterAlright, this conversation is getting a little exasperating.
Is it that hard to distinguish between intelligent debate (political or otherwise) and purposeful attempts to start left-vs-right flame wars?
It isn’t for me. And sorry Brian, you can defend it all you want, but you have done it a million times and your claim that you are “responding” or “defending” is just disingenuous. The comment I deleted was attempt to rile people up and start yet another partisan namecalling debate. If you didn’t recognize it as such, well, I don’t really care.
Any attempt to recast this threadjacking issue as one side being victimized by the other, just because Brian is the most prominent threadjacker, is ridiculous. For instance, earlier today I deleted a profoundly insipid thread by NewToSanDiego called “a modest proposal” because it was nothing but an obvious and lame attempt to start a flame war (coming from the ultra right wing side). Believe me, that guy/gal is every bit as close to Banville as Brian.
So please, people, let’s not make this more complicated than it is. I’m just asking people to not start political flame wars. It’s pretty simple.
Rich
June 11, 2010 at 7:50 PM in reply to: Threadjackers Will Be Persecuted (Maybe Even Prosecuted) #563149
Rich ToscanoKeymasterAlright, this conversation is getting a little exasperating.
Is it that hard to distinguish between intelligent debate (political or otherwise) and purposeful attempts to start left-vs-right flame wars?
It isn’t for me. And sorry Brian, you can defend it all you want, but you have done it a million times and your claim that you are “responding” or “defending” is just disingenuous. The comment I deleted was attempt to rile people up and start yet another partisan namecalling debate. If you didn’t recognize it as such, well, I don’t really care.
Any attempt to recast this threadjacking issue as one side being victimized by the other, just because Brian is the most prominent threadjacker, is ridiculous. For instance, earlier today I deleted a profoundly insipid thread by NewToSanDiego called “a modest proposal” because it was nothing but an obvious and lame attempt to start a flame war (coming from the ultra right wing side). Believe me, that guy/gal is every bit as close to Banville as Brian.
So please, people, let’s not make this more complicated than it is. I’m just asking people to not start political flame wars. It’s pretty simple.
Rich
June 11, 2010 at 7:50 PM in reply to: Threadjackers Will Be Persecuted (Maybe Even Prosecuted) #563655
Rich ToscanoKeymasterAlright, this conversation is getting a little exasperating.
Is it that hard to distinguish between intelligent debate (political or otherwise) and purposeful attempts to start left-vs-right flame wars?
It isn’t for me. And sorry Brian, you can defend it all you want, but you have done it a million times and your claim that you are “responding” or “defending” is just disingenuous. The comment I deleted was attempt to rile people up and start yet another partisan namecalling debate. If you didn’t recognize it as such, well, I don’t really care.
Any attempt to recast this threadjacking issue as one side being victimized by the other, just because Brian is the most prominent threadjacker, is ridiculous. For instance, earlier today I deleted a profoundly insipid thread by NewToSanDiego called “a modest proposal” because it was nothing but an obvious and lame attempt to start a flame war (coming from the ultra right wing side). Believe me, that guy/gal is every bit as close to Banville as Brian.
So please, people, let’s not make this more complicated than it is. I’m just asking people to not start political flame wars. It’s pretty simple.
Rich
June 11, 2010 at 7:50 PM in reply to: Threadjackers Will Be Persecuted (Maybe Even Prosecuted) #563761
Rich ToscanoKeymasterAlright, this conversation is getting a little exasperating.
Is it that hard to distinguish between intelligent debate (political or otherwise) and purposeful attempts to start left-vs-right flame wars?
It isn’t for me. And sorry Brian, you can defend it all you want, but you have done it a million times and your claim that you are “responding” or “defending” is just disingenuous. The comment I deleted was attempt to rile people up and start yet another partisan namecalling debate. If you didn’t recognize it as such, well, I don’t really care.
Any attempt to recast this threadjacking issue as one side being victimized by the other, just because Brian is the most prominent threadjacker, is ridiculous. For instance, earlier today I deleted a profoundly insipid thread by NewToSanDiego called “a modest proposal” because it was nothing but an obvious and lame attempt to start a flame war (coming from the ultra right wing side). Believe me, that guy/gal is every bit as close to Banville as Brian.
So please, people, let’s not make this more complicated than it is. I’m just asking people to not start political flame wars. It’s pretty simple.
Rich
June 11, 2010 at 7:50 PM in reply to: Threadjackers Will Be Persecuted (Maybe Even Prosecuted) #564047
Rich ToscanoKeymasterAlright, this conversation is getting a little exasperating.
Is it that hard to distinguish between intelligent debate (political or otherwise) and purposeful attempts to start left-vs-right flame wars?
It isn’t for me. And sorry Brian, you can defend it all you want, but you have done it a million times and your claim that you are “responding” or “defending” is just disingenuous. The comment I deleted was attempt to rile people up and start yet another partisan namecalling debate. If you didn’t recognize it as such, well, I don’t really care.
Any attempt to recast this threadjacking issue as one side being victimized by the other, just because Brian is the most prominent threadjacker, is ridiculous. For instance, earlier today I deleted a profoundly insipid thread by NewToSanDiego called “a modest proposal” because it was nothing but an obvious and lame attempt to start a flame war (coming from the ultra right wing side). Believe me, that guy/gal is every bit as close to Banville as Brian.
So please, people, let’s not make this more complicated than it is. I’m just asking people to not start political flame wars. It’s pretty simple.
Rich
June 11, 2010 at 3:04 PM in reply to: Threadjackers Will Be Persecuted (Maybe Even Prosecuted) #562786
Rich ToscanoKeymaster[quote=briansd1]
I just think that partisan attacks deserve responses.
[/quote]Since the whole issue here is STARTING political flamewars, this is meaningless and/or a mischaracterization.
But whatever. The guidelines should be clear now.
June 11, 2010 at 3:04 PM in reply to: Threadjackers Will Be Persecuted (Maybe Even Prosecuted) #562884
Rich ToscanoKeymaster[quote=briansd1]
I just think that partisan attacks deserve responses.
[/quote]Since the whole issue here is STARTING political flamewars, this is meaningless and/or a mischaracterization.
But whatever. The guidelines should be clear now.
June 11, 2010 at 3:04 PM in reply to: Threadjackers Will Be Persecuted (Maybe Even Prosecuted) #563391
Rich ToscanoKeymaster[quote=briansd1]
I just think that partisan attacks deserve responses.
[/quote]Since the whole issue here is STARTING political flamewars, this is meaningless and/or a mischaracterization.
But whatever. The guidelines should be clear now.
June 11, 2010 at 3:04 PM in reply to: Threadjackers Will Be Persecuted (Maybe Even Prosecuted) #563496
Rich ToscanoKeymaster[quote=briansd1]
I just think that partisan attacks deserve responses.
[/quote]Since the whole issue here is STARTING political flamewars, this is meaningless and/or a mischaracterization.
But whatever. The guidelines should be clear now.
June 11, 2010 at 3:04 PM in reply to: Threadjackers Will Be Persecuted (Maybe Even Prosecuted) #563783
Rich ToscanoKeymaster[quote=briansd1]
I just think that partisan attacks deserve responses.
[/quote]Since the whole issue here is STARTING political flamewars, this is meaningless and/or a mischaracterization.
But whatever. The guidelines should be clear now.
June 11, 2010 at 10:22 AM in reply to: Threadjackers Will Be Persecuted (Maybe Even Prosecuted) #563231
Rich ToscanoKeymasterUpdate: I added this to the original post:
“Come to think of it, don’t even bother starting such a discussion.”
rich
-
AuthorPosts
