Menu

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 451 through 465 (of 1,872 total)
1 2 3 … 30 31 32 … 123 124 125
  • Author
    Posts
  • May 1, 2010 at 5:36 PM in reply to: OT: “Bob Rubin Just Wants to be Cuddled” #546625
    Ricechex
    Participant

    I think these statistics are skewed. The problem is, there are stories, and media sensation when a politician or celebrity cheats. You don’t see news stories (as if it is news) about men that DON’T cheat. Sorry Brian and Dave that you have fallen into the MSM trap.

    April 22, 2010 at 7:22 PM in reply to: TAX TAX TAX and more TAX #542578
    Ricechex
    Participant

    Regarding having 2 jobs and taxes, I cannot quite understand the tax system on this one. As SD Realtor, I have 1 full time job and 1 part time job.

    As explained to me by my accountant:
    The first job (full time) eats up the lower tax rate. Somehow, I pay 40% taxes on the second lower earning job.

    Hypothetically, if I got a raise at the full time job to equal the gross earnings of the part time job, then my full time tax bracket might increase, but not to 40%.

    So, unless the second job pays really well, it may not be worth the time/effort.

    April 22, 2010 at 7:22 PM in reply to: TAX TAX TAX and more TAX #542694
    Ricechex
    Participant

    Regarding having 2 jobs and taxes, I cannot quite understand the tax system on this one. As SD Realtor, I have 1 full time job and 1 part time job.

    As explained to me by my accountant:
    The first job (full time) eats up the lower tax rate. Somehow, I pay 40% taxes on the second lower earning job.

    Hypothetically, if I got a raise at the full time job to equal the gross earnings of the part time job, then my full time tax bracket might increase, but not to 40%.

    So, unless the second job pays really well, it may not be worth the time/effort.

    April 22, 2010 at 7:22 PM in reply to: TAX TAX TAX and more TAX #543172
    Ricechex
    Participant

    Regarding having 2 jobs and taxes, I cannot quite understand the tax system on this one. As SD Realtor, I have 1 full time job and 1 part time job.

    As explained to me by my accountant:
    The first job (full time) eats up the lower tax rate. Somehow, I pay 40% taxes on the second lower earning job.

    Hypothetically, if I got a raise at the full time job to equal the gross earnings of the part time job, then my full time tax bracket might increase, but not to 40%.

    So, unless the second job pays really well, it may not be worth the time/effort.

    April 22, 2010 at 7:22 PM in reply to: TAX TAX TAX and more TAX #543265
    Ricechex
    Participant

    Regarding having 2 jobs and taxes, I cannot quite understand the tax system on this one. As SD Realtor, I have 1 full time job and 1 part time job.

    As explained to me by my accountant:
    The first job (full time) eats up the lower tax rate. Somehow, I pay 40% taxes on the second lower earning job.

    Hypothetically, if I got a raise at the full time job to equal the gross earnings of the part time job, then my full time tax bracket might increase, but not to 40%.

    So, unless the second job pays really well, it may not be worth the time/effort.

    April 22, 2010 at 7:22 PM in reply to: TAX TAX TAX and more TAX #543538
    Ricechex
    Participant

    Regarding having 2 jobs and taxes, I cannot quite understand the tax system on this one. As SD Realtor, I have 1 full time job and 1 part time job.

    As explained to me by my accountant:
    The first job (full time) eats up the lower tax rate. Somehow, I pay 40% taxes on the second lower earning job.

    Hypothetically, if I got a raise at the full time job to equal the gross earnings of the part time job, then my full time tax bracket might increase, but not to 40%.

    So, unless the second job pays really well, it may not be worth the time/effort.

    April 8, 2010 at 1:03 PM in reply to: Escrow company got my name wrong #537342
    Ricechex
    Participant

    [quote=CBad]I’m certainly no expert on this but having the name entirely wrong and changing it after the fact isn’t an addition or ammendment to instructions. I wouldn’t sign anything. Sounds like they are being lazy![/quote]

    I agree. It is lack of attention to detail, and certainly is a red flag (check EVERYTHING with these people….).

    April 8, 2010 at 1:03 PM in reply to: Escrow company got my name wrong #537465
    Ricechex
    Participant

    [quote=CBad]I’m certainly no expert on this but having the name entirely wrong and changing it after the fact isn’t an addition or ammendment to instructions. I wouldn’t sign anything. Sounds like they are being lazy![/quote]

    I agree. It is lack of attention to detail, and certainly is a red flag (check EVERYTHING with these people….).

    April 8, 2010 at 1:03 PM in reply to: Escrow company got my name wrong #537930
    Ricechex
    Participant

    [quote=CBad]I’m certainly no expert on this but having the name entirely wrong and changing it after the fact isn’t an addition or ammendment to instructions. I wouldn’t sign anything. Sounds like they are being lazy![/quote]

    I agree. It is lack of attention to detail, and certainly is a red flag (check EVERYTHING with these people….).

    April 8, 2010 at 1:03 PM in reply to: Escrow company got my name wrong #538027
    Ricechex
    Participant

    [quote=CBad]I’m certainly no expert on this but having the name entirely wrong and changing it after the fact isn’t an addition or ammendment to instructions. I wouldn’t sign anything. Sounds like they are being lazy![/quote]

    I agree. It is lack of attention to detail, and certainly is a red flag (check EVERYTHING with these people….).

    April 8, 2010 at 1:03 PM in reply to: Escrow company got my name wrong #538294
    Ricechex
    Participant

    [quote=CBad]I’m certainly no expert on this but having the name entirely wrong and changing it after the fact isn’t an addition or ammendment to instructions. I wouldn’t sign anything. Sounds like they are being lazy![/quote]

    I agree. It is lack of attention to detail, and certainly is a red flag (check EVERYTHING with these people….).

    April 3, 2010 at 11:01 PM in reply to: Pictures of China’s “Ghost town” #535306
    Ricechex
    Participant

    Really freaky. Thanks for posting that Arraya.

    April 3, 2010 at 11:01 PM in reply to: Pictures of China’s “Ghost town” #535435
    Ricechex
    Participant

    Really freaky. Thanks for posting that Arraya.

    April 3, 2010 at 11:01 PM in reply to: Pictures of China’s “Ghost town” #535893
    Ricechex
    Participant

    Really freaky. Thanks for posting that Arraya.

    April 3, 2010 at 11:01 PM in reply to: Pictures of China’s “Ghost town” #535990
    Ricechex
    Participant

    Really freaky. Thanks for posting that Arraya.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 15 posts - 451 through 465 (of 1,872 total)
1 2 3 … 30 31 32 … 123 124 125