[Raybyrnes]

Some of the responses here how how far in the wrong direction we have traveled. In middle eastern countries people hands are cut off for stealing yet here we are trying to denomize the 2 employees for their response. Complete BS. If more people were proactive citizens and those stealing realized they faced the risk of a complete ass kicking then maybe there would be a lot less theft. Less theft would mean that we as consumers would not have to pay for all the security measures that companies are faced with ad therefor price into the cost of goods sold.

I am not going to encourage this behavior but I would be hard pressed to write them up or take any action.

[Raybyrnes]

Some of the responses here how how far in the wrong direction we have traveled. In middle eastern countries people hands are cut off for stealing yet here we are trying to denomize the 2 employees for their response. Complete BS. If more people were proactive citizens and those stealing realized they faced the risk of a complete ass kicking then maybe there would be a lot less theft. Less theft would mean that we as consumers would not have to pay for all the security measures that companies are faced with ad therefor price into the cost of goods sold.

I am not going to encourage this behavior but I would be hard pressed to write them up or take any action.

[Raybyrnes]

Some of the responses here how how far in the wrong direction we have traveled. In middle eastern countries people hands are cut off for stealing yet here we are trying to denomize the 2 employees for their response. Complete BS. If more people were proactive citizens and those stealing realized they faced the risk of a complete ass kicking then maybe there would be a lot less theft. Less theft would mean that we as consumers would not have to pay for all the security measures that companies are faced with ad therefor price into the cost of goods sold.

I am not going to encourage this behavior but I would be hard pressed to write them up or take any action.

[Raybyrnes]

Some of the responses here how how far in the wrong direction we have traveled. In middle eastern countries people hands are cut off for stealing yet here we are trying to denomize the 2 employees for their response. Complete BS. If more people were proactive citizens and those stealing realized they faced the risk of a complete ass kicking then maybe there would be a lot less theft. Less theft would mean that we as consumers would not have to pay for all the security measures that companies are faced with ad therefor price into the cost of goods sold.

I am not going to encourage this behavior but I would be hard pressed to write them up or take any action.

[Raybyrnes]

Some of the responses here how how far in the wrong direction we have traveled. In middle eastern countries people hands are cut off for stealing yet here we are trying to denomize the 2 employees for their response. Complete BS. If more people were proactive citizens and those stealing realized they faced the risk of a complete ass kicking then maybe there would be a lot less theft. Less theft would mean that we as consumers would not have to pay for all the security measures that companies are faced with ad therefor price into the cost of goods sold.

I am not going to encourage this behavior but I would be hard pressed to write them up or take any action.

[Raybyrnes]

Recently asked a friend fairly high up in te system for the market rebound.

Here is the response:

“banks r now offering 10x leverage to hedge funds for AAA assets and 5x for AA rated”

Maybe this game can go on forever. Very frustrating

[Raybyrnes]

Recently asked a friend fairly high up in te system for the market rebound.

Here is the response:

“banks r now offering 10x leverage to hedge funds for AAA assets and 5x for AA rated”

Maybe this game can go on forever. Very frustrating

[Raybyrnes]

Recently asked a friend fairly high up in te system for the market rebound.

Here is the response:

“banks r now offering 10x leverage to hedge funds for AAA assets and 5x for AA rated”

Maybe this game can go on forever. Very frustrating

[Raybyrnes]

Recently asked a friend fairly high up in te system for the market rebound.

Here is the response:

“banks r now offering 10x leverage to hedge funds for AAA assets and 5x for AA rated”

Maybe this game can go on forever. Very frustrating

[Raybyrnes]

Recently asked a friend fairly high up in te system for the market rebound.

Here is the response:

“banks r now offering 10x leverage to hedge funds for AAA assets and 5x for AA rated”

Maybe this game can go on forever. Very frustrating

[Raybyrnes]

First Principal is to Maximize wealth. This can be accomplished by minimizing taxes burden. Second principal max liquiidity. If money needs to be pulled out from Roth for house, college costs, etc it is far easier then doing so from a traditional.

For all of you who have made arguments for the Traditional, I want to let you know that is exactly the logical argument that I find acceptable. Saying that a person is saving money with the traditonal by not paying taxes n ow. Not acceptable.

[Raybyrnes]

First Principal is to Maximize wealth. This can be accomplished by minimizing taxes burden. Second principal max liquiidity. If money needs to be pulled out from Roth for house, college costs, etc it is far easier then doing so from a traditional.

For all of you who have made arguments for the Traditional, I want to let you know that is exactly the logical argument that I find acceptable. Saying that a person is saving money with the traditonal by not paying taxes n ow. Not acceptable.

[Raybyrnes]

First Principal is to Maximize wealth. This can be accomplished by minimizing taxes burden. Second principal max liquiidity. If money needs to be pulled out from Roth for house, college costs, etc it is far easier then doing so from a traditional.

For all of you who have made arguments for the Traditional, I want to let you know that is exactly the logical argument that I find acceptable. Saying that a person is saving money with the traditonal by not paying taxes n ow. Not acceptable.

[Raybyrnes]

First Principal is to Maximize wealth. This can be accomplished by minimizing taxes burden. Second principal max liquiidity. If money needs to be pulled out from Roth for house, college costs, etc it is far easier then doing so from a traditional.

For all of you who have made arguments for the Traditional, I want to let you know that is exactly the logical argument that I find acceptable. Saying that a person is saving money with the traditonal by not paying taxes n ow. Not acceptable.

[Raybyrnes]

First Principal is to Maximize wealth. This can be accomplished by minimizing taxes burden. Second principal max liquiidity. If money needs to be pulled out from Roth for house, college costs, etc it is far easier then doing so from a traditional.

For all of you who have made arguments for the Traditional, I want to let you know that is exactly the logical argument that I find acceptable. Saying that a person is saving money with the traditonal by not paying taxes n ow. Not acceptable.

[Author]

Posts