- This topic has 120 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 4 months ago by
Ricechex.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 2, 2010 at 1:43 PM #546800May 2, 2010 at 2:03 PM #545844
scaredyclassic
Participantit’s not like i don’t see the other side. clearly it is bad for people to be able to freely shoplift. But most people don’t shoplift. And most shoplifters don’t run. And shoplifters who run and use force to evade can be charged with robbery, a strike in California requiring prison unless there are unusual circumstances warranting probaiton. So it’s not like we’re soft on forceful shoplifters. maybe someone could market a gooey tracking device to sell to shopowners that adheres to clothing and operates like lojack which we could throw at shoplifters.
May 2, 2010 at 2:03 PM #545957scaredyclassic
Participantit’s not like i don’t see the other side. clearly it is bad for people to be able to freely shoplift. But most people don’t shoplift. And most shoplifters don’t run. And shoplifters who run and use force to evade can be charged with robbery, a strike in California requiring prison unless there are unusual circumstances warranting probaiton. So it’s not like we’re soft on forceful shoplifters. maybe someone could market a gooey tracking device to sell to shopowners that adheres to clothing and operates like lojack which we could throw at shoplifters.
May 2, 2010 at 2:03 PM #546437scaredyclassic
Participantit’s not like i don’t see the other side. clearly it is bad for people to be able to freely shoplift. But most people don’t shoplift. And most shoplifters don’t run. And shoplifters who run and use force to evade can be charged with robbery, a strike in California requiring prison unless there are unusual circumstances warranting probaiton. So it’s not like we’re soft on forceful shoplifters. maybe someone could market a gooey tracking device to sell to shopowners that adheres to clothing and operates like lojack which we could throw at shoplifters.
May 2, 2010 at 2:03 PM #546533scaredyclassic
Participantit’s not like i don’t see the other side. clearly it is bad for people to be able to freely shoplift. But most people don’t shoplift. And most shoplifters don’t run. And shoplifters who run and use force to evade can be charged with robbery, a strike in California requiring prison unless there are unusual circumstances warranting probaiton. So it’s not like we’re soft on forceful shoplifters. maybe someone could market a gooey tracking device to sell to shopowners that adheres to clothing and operates like lojack which we could throw at shoplifters.
May 2, 2010 at 2:03 PM #546805scaredyclassic
Participantit’s not like i don’t see the other side. clearly it is bad for people to be able to freely shoplift. But most people don’t shoplift. And most shoplifters don’t run. And shoplifters who run and use force to evade can be charged with robbery, a strike in California requiring prison unless there are unusual circumstances warranting probaiton. So it’s not like we’re soft on forceful shoplifters. maybe someone could market a gooey tracking device to sell to shopowners that adheres to clothing and operates like lojack which we could throw at shoplifters.
May 2, 2010 at 2:04 PM #545849scaredyclassic
Participantor maybe the official business ahndbook policy would be that the chasing of a shoplifter is treated as “time off” like a holiday, you don’t get paid for that time, it’s like a break or a vacation.
May 2, 2010 at 2:04 PM #545962scaredyclassic
Participantor maybe the official business ahndbook policy would be that the chasing of a shoplifter is treated as “time off” like a holiday, you don’t get paid for that time, it’s like a break or a vacation.
May 2, 2010 at 2:04 PM #546442scaredyclassic
Participantor maybe the official business ahndbook policy would be that the chasing of a shoplifter is treated as “time off” like a holiday, you don’t get paid for that time, it’s like a break or a vacation.
May 2, 2010 at 2:04 PM #546538scaredyclassic
Participantor maybe the official business ahndbook policy would be that the chasing of a shoplifter is treated as “time off” like a holiday, you don’t get paid for that time, it’s like a break or a vacation.
May 2, 2010 at 2:04 PM #546810scaredyclassic
Participantor maybe the official business ahndbook policy would be that the chasing of a shoplifter is treated as “time off” like a holiday, you don’t get paid for that time, it’s like a break or a vacation.
May 2, 2010 at 4:29 PM #545864Coronita
Participant[quote=scaredycat]or maybe the official business ahndbook policy would be that the chasing of a shoplifter is treated as “time off” like a holiday, you don’t get paid for that time, it’s like a break or a vacation.[/quote]
Well, technically, the employees were on their “break”…So technically, their actions wasn’t on company time. On the other hand, they were probably still wearing their company’s clothes.
May 2, 2010 at 4:29 PM #545977Coronita
Participant[quote=scaredycat]or maybe the official business ahndbook policy would be that the chasing of a shoplifter is treated as “time off” like a holiday, you don’t get paid for that time, it’s like a break or a vacation.[/quote]
Well, technically, the employees were on their “break”…So technically, their actions wasn’t on company time. On the other hand, they were probably still wearing their company’s clothes.
May 2, 2010 at 4:29 PM #546457Coronita
Participant[quote=scaredycat]or maybe the official business ahndbook policy would be that the chasing of a shoplifter is treated as “time off” like a holiday, you don’t get paid for that time, it’s like a break or a vacation.[/quote]
Well, technically, the employees were on their “break”…So technically, their actions wasn’t on company time. On the other hand, they were probably still wearing their company’s clothes.
May 2, 2010 at 4:29 PM #546553Coronita
Participant[quote=scaredycat]or maybe the official business ahndbook policy would be that the chasing of a shoplifter is treated as “time off” like a holiday, you don’t get paid for that time, it’s like a break or a vacation.[/quote]
Well, technically, the employees were on their “break”…So technically, their actions wasn’t on company time. On the other hand, they were probably still wearing their company’s clothes.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.