- This topic has 120 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 7 months ago by
Ricechex.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 2, 2010 at 11:23 AM #546780May 2, 2010 at 11:55 AM #545824
scaredyclassic
Participantso if the employees had cut off the shoplifter’s hands?
May 2, 2010 at 11:55 AM #545937scaredyclassic
Participantso if the employees had cut off the shoplifter’s hands?
May 2, 2010 at 11:55 AM #546416scaredyclassic
Participantso if the employees had cut off the shoplifter’s hands?
May 2, 2010 at 11:55 AM #546513scaredyclassic
Participantso if the employees had cut off the shoplifter’s hands?
May 2, 2010 at 11:55 AM #546785scaredyclassic
Participantso if the employees had cut off the shoplifter’s hands?
May 2, 2010 at 11:59 AM #545829patientrenter
Participant[quote=scaredycat]i guess the problem is if the shoplifter had gotten hurt or killed–or more likely, an innocent bystander had been toppled — say a fragile senior citizen who was going on a power walk around the mall — then the pursuers and their employers could ahve been the subject of lawsuits…..
it’s just stuff, after all…and the guys who do the chasing aren’t always noble do-gooders, but overeager goofballs who welcome the opportunity to chase and give a good ass-whupping, which, altough probably deserved, is not really in their job description….[/quote]
I think this merely points out the problems with an over-reach of our legal system.
If I ran that store, I should have the freedom to distinguish between employees laudably showing their altruism, or gung-ho thrillseekers looking for an excuse to get a thrill for themselves. I shouldn’t be forced by the legal system to conclude that, even if it is altruism, I have to punish it.
May 2, 2010 at 11:59 AM #545942patientrenter
Participant[quote=scaredycat]i guess the problem is if the shoplifter had gotten hurt or killed–or more likely, an innocent bystander had been toppled — say a fragile senior citizen who was going on a power walk around the mall — then the pursuers and their employers could ahve been the subject of lawsuits…..
it’s just stuff, after all…and the guys who do the chasing aren’t always noble do-gooders, but overeager goofballs who welcome the opportunity to chase and give a good ass-whupping, which, altough probably deserved, is not really in their job description….[/quote]
I think this merely points out the problems with an over-reach of our legal system.
If I ran that store, I should have the freedom to distinguish between employees laudably showing their altruism, or gung-ho thrillseekers looking for an excuse to get a thrill for themselves. I shouldn’t be forced by the legal system to conclude that, even if it is altruism, I have to punish it.
May 2, 2010 at 11:59 AM #546421patientrenter
Participant[quote=scaredycat]i guess the problem is if the shoplifter had gotten hurt or killed–or more likely, an innocent bystander had been toppled — say a fragile senior citizen who was going on a power walk around the mall — then the pursuers and their employers could ahve been the subject of lawsuits…..
it’s just stuff, after all…and the guys who do the chasing aren’t always noble do-gooders, but overeager goofballs who welcome the opportunity to chase and give a good ass-whupping, which, altough probably deserved, is not really in their job description….[/quote]
I think this merely points out the problems with an over-reach of our legal system.
If I ran that store, I should have the freedom to distinguish between employees laudably showing their altruism, or gung-ho thrillseekers looking for an excuse to get a thrill for themselves. I shouldn’t be forced by the legal system to conclude that, even if it is altruism, I have to punish it.
May 2, 2010 at 11:59 AM #546518patientrenter
Participant[quote=scaredycat]i guess the problem is if the shoplifter had gotten hurt or killed–or more likely, an innocent bystander had been toppled — say a fragile senior citizen who was going on a power walk around the mall — then the pursuers and their employers could ahve been the subject of lawsuits…..
it’s just stuff, after all…and the guys who do the chasing aren’t always noble do-gooders, but overeager goofballs who welcome the opportunity to chase and give a good ass-whupping, which, altough probably deserved, is not really in their job description….[/quote]
I think this merely points out the problems with an over-reach of our legal system.
If I ran that store, I should have the freedom to distinguish between employees laudably showing their altruism, or gung-ho thrillseekers looking for an excuse to get a thrill for themselves. I shouldn’t be forced by the legal system to conclude that, even if it is altruism, I have to punish it.
May 2, 2010 at 11:59 AM #546790patientrenter
Participant[quote=scaredycat]i guess the problem is if the shoplifter had gotten hurt or killed–or more likely, an innocent bystander had been toppled — say a fragile senior citizen who was going on a power walk around the mall — then the pursuers and their employers could ahve been the subject of lawsuits…..
it’s just stuff, after all…and the guys who do the chasing aren’t always noble do-gooders, but overeager goofballs who welcome the opportunity to chase and give a good ass-whupping, which, altough probably deserved, is not really in their job description….[/quote]
I think this merely points out the problems with an over-reach of our legal system.
If I ran that store, I should have the freedom to distinguish between employees laudably showing their altruism, or gung-ho thrillseekers looking for an excuse to get a thrill for themselves. I shouldn’t be forced by the legal system to conclude that, even if it is altruism, I have to punish it.
May 2, 2010 at 1:43 PM #545839scaredyclassic
Participantbut the problem is that regardless of what your individual judgment is, you might have to face the judgment of a jury that disagrees.
And who’s to say that the business owner isn’t a gung-ho thrill-seeker who is eager to dole out abeating for any theft.
Does your opinion on catch-and-beat vary if the shoplifter is a14 year old stealing a candy bar? A 12 year old girl?
Why/
Don’t we have to teach em young?
Beat the tar out of them and they won’t be shoplifting again.
Society will be better! Good for the community. what about a 10 year old? Or if it’s a senior citizen? Whip em.
May 2, 2010 at 1:43 PM #545952scaredyclassic
Participantbut the problem is that regardless of what your individual judgment is, you might have to face the judgment of a jury that disagrees.
And who’s to say that the business owner isn’t a gung-ho thrill-seeker who is eager to dole out abeating for any theft.
Does your opinion on catch-and-beat vary if the shoplifter is a14 year old stealing a candy bar? A 12 year old girl?
Why/
Don’t we have to teach em young?
Beat the tar out of them and they won’t be shoplifting again.
Society will be better! Good for the community. what about a 10 year old? Or if it’s a senior citizen? Whip em.
May 2, 2010 at 1:43 PM #546432scaredyclassic
Participantbut the problem is that regardless of what your individual judgment is, you might have to face the judgment of a jury that disagrees.
And who’s to say that the business owner isn’t a gung-ho thrill-seeker who is eager to dole out abeating for any theft.
Does your opinion on catch-and-beat vary if the shoplifter is a14 year old stealing a candy bar? A 12 year old girl?
Why/
Don’t we have to teach em young?
Beat the tar out of them and they won’t be shoplifting again.
Society will be better! Good for the community. what about a 10 year old? Or if it’s a senior citizen? Whip em.
May 2, 2010 at 1:43 PM #546528scaredyclassic
Participantbut the problem is that regardless of what your individual judgment is, you might have to face the judgment of a jury that disagrees.
And who’s to say that the business owner isn’t a gung-ho thrill-seeker who is eager to dole out abeating for any theft.
Does your opinion on catch-and-beat vary if the shoplifter is a14 year old stealing a candy bar? A 12 year old girl?
Why/
Don’t we have to teach em young?
Beat the tar out of them and they won’t be shoplifting again.
Society will be better! Good for the community. what about a 10 year old? Or if it’s a senior citizen? Whip em.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.