Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
peterb
ParticipantWhen I was a kid, there was nothing great about Encinitas and it was not expensive by any stretch. So everyone that talks like it was the way it is from back in the day, does not know what they’re talking about. Get rid of high paying jobs near it, and there goes the price.
ParticipantWhen I was a kid, there was nothing great about Encinitas and it was not expensive by any stretch. So everyone that talks like it was the way it is from back in the day, does not know what they’re talking about. Get rid of high paying jobs near it, and there goes the price.
ParticipantWhen I was a kid, there was nothing great about Encinitas and it was not expensive by any stretch. So everyone that talks like it was the way it is from back in the day, does not know what they’re talking about. Get rid of high paying jobs near it, and there goes the price.
ParticipantEveryone should read this:
It’s about the financing. That’s the RE game! The toxicity train is about to hit the better hoods.
ParticipantEveryone should read this:
It’s about the financing. That’s the RE game! The toxicity train is about to hit the better hoods.
ParticipantEveryone should read this:
It’s about the financing. That’s the RE game! The toxicity train is about to hit the better hoods.
ParticipantEveryone should read this:
It’s about the financing. That’s the RE game! The toxicity train is about to hit the better hoods.
ParticipantEveryone should read this:
It’s about the financing. That’s the RE game! The toxicity train is about to hit the better hoods.
ParticipantI’ll give Schiff credit for calling this contraction when it was not the popular thing to do. But, he was dead wrong on decoupling and he has a really sorry excuse for getting it wrong. Also, his book is not that impressive. He’s a generalist. For more in-depth information and analysis, Marc Faber and Bob Hoye are a lot sharper then Schiff. And of coures, Roubini is the most accurate economist being listen to on MSM.
This is looking like a global recession at the very least. And that means everything goes down for a while. All currencies are looking flawed. So the US$ is gaining back some of it’s losses over the last 4 years.
Hyperinflation means a basic collapse of the currency. I dont think we’ll get that bad, but you never know. I would not doubt the US$ losing half it’s purchasing power in a few years, though.
But it’s all relative. If people will not borrow and lenders wont lend, where’s the money going? Nowhere, and thus prices are going down. But, if this changes and all these funds are directed at some asset or some investment, then whatever that thing is, it’s going to rise in price. This is really how we got out of the 2002 recession. The Fed put out free money and it took about 8 months before it started to find a home in RE. Then we were off to the races on RE prices. I suspect that gold may find itself in a similar situation. If it gathers popularity and there’s nothing else rising, cheap money will be forced into it and perhaps oil as well. Especially since all the currencies of the world are being inflated. It’s kind of a natural shift anyway…..too much paper and gold looks safer, and it’s going up in price. So it may feed on itself in that way and become self-fullfilling.ParticipantI’ll give Schiff credit for calling this contraction when it was not the popular thing to do. But, he was dead wrong on decoupling and he has a really sorry excuse for getting it wrong. Also, his book is not that impressive. He’s a generalist. For more in-depth information and analysis, Marc Faber and Bob Hoye are a lot sharper then Schiff. And of coures, Roubini is the most accurate economist being listen to on MSM.
This is looking like a global recession at the very least. And that means everything goes down for a while. All currencies are looking flawed. So the US$ is gaining back some of it’s losses over the last 4 years.
Hyperinflation means a basic collapse of the currency. I dont think we’ll get that bad, but you never know. I would not doubt the US$ losing half it’s purchasing power in a few years, though.
But it’s all relative. If people will not borrow and lenders wont lend, where’s the money going? Nowhere, and thus prices are going down. But, if this changes and all these funds are directed at some asset or some investment, then whatever that thing is, it’s going to rise in price. This is really how we got out of the 2002 recession. The Fed put out free money and it took about 8 months before it started to find a home in RE. Then we were off to the races on RE prices. I suspect that gold may find itself in a similar situation. If it gathers popularity and there’s nothing else rising, cheap money will be forced into it and perhaps oil as well. Especially since all the currencies of the world are being inflated. It’s kind of a natural shift anyway…..too much paper and gold looks safer, and it’s going up in price. So it may feed on itself in that way and become self-fullfilling.ParticipantI’ll give Schiff credit for calling this contraction when it was not the popular thing to do. But, he was dead wrong on decoupling and he has a really sorry excuse for getting it wrong. Also, his book is not that impressive. He’s a generalist. For more in-depth information and analysis, Marc Faber and Bob Hoye are a lot sharper then Schiff. And of coures, Roubini is the most accurate economist being listen to on MSM.
This is looking like a global recession at the very least. And that means everything goes down for a while. All currencies are looking flawed. So the US$ is gaining back some of it’s losses over the last 4 years.
Hyperinflation means a basic collapse of the currency. I dont think we’ll get that bad, but you never know. I would not doubt the US$ losing half it’s purchasing power in a few years, though.
But it’s all relative. If people will not borrow and lenders wont lend, where’s the money going? Nowhere, and thus prices are going down. But, if this changes and all these funds are directed at some asset or some investment, then whatever that thing is, it’s going to rise in price. This is really how we got out of the 2002 recession. The Fed put out free money and it took about 8 months before it started to find a home in RE. Then we were off to the races on RE prices. I suspect that gold may find itself in a similar situation. If it gathers popularity and there’s nothing else rising, cheap money will be forced into it and perhaps oil as well. Especially since all the currencies of the world are being inflated. It’s kind of a natural shift anyway…..too much paper and gold looks safer, and it’s going up in price. So it may feed on itself in that way and become self-fullfilling.ParticipantI’ll give Schiff credit for calling this contraction when it was not the popular thing to do. But, he was dead wrong on decoupling and he has a really sorry excuse for getting it wrong. Also, his book is not that impressive. He’s a generalist. For more in-depth information and analysis, Marc Faber and Bob Hoye are a lot sharper then Schiff. And of coures, Roubini is the most accurate economist being listen to on MSM.
This is looking like a global recession at the very least. And that means everything goes down for a while. All currencies are looking flawed. So the US$ is gaining back some of it’s losses over the last 4 years.
Hyperinflation means a basic collapse of the currency. I dont think we’ll get that bad, but you never know. I would not doubt the US$ losing half it’s purchasing power in a few years, though.
But it’s all relative. If people will not borrow and lenders wont lend, where’s the money going? Nowhere, and thus prices are going down. But, if this changes and all these funds are directed at some asset or some investment, then whatever that thing is, it’s going to rise in price. This is really how we got out of the 2002 recession. The Fed put out free money and it took about 8 months before it started to find a home in RE. Then we were off to the races on RE prices. I suspect that gold may find itself in a similar situation. If it gathers popularity and there’s nothing else rising, cheap money will be forced into it and perhaps oil as well. Especially since all the currencies of the world are being inflated. It’s kind of a natural shift anyway…..too much paper and gold looks safer, and it’s going up in price. So it may feed on itself in that way and become self-fullfilling.ParticipantI’ll give Schiff credit for calling this contraction when it was not the popular thing to do. But, he was dead wrong on decoupling and he has a really sorry excuse for getting it wrong. Also, his book is not that impressive. He’s a generalist. For more in-depth information and analysis, Marc Faber and Bob Hoye are a lot sharper then Schiff. And of coures, Roubini is the most accurate economist being listen to on MSM.
This is looking like a global recession at the very least. And that means everything goes down for a while. All currencies are looking flawed. So the US$ is gaining back some of it’s losses over the last 4 years.
Hyperinflation means a basic collapse of the currency. I dont think we’ll get that bad, but you never know. I would not doubt the US$ losing half it’s purchasing power in a few years, though.
But it’s all relative. If people will not borrow and lenders wont lend, where’s the money going? Nowhere, and thus prices are going down. But, if this changes and all these funds are directed at some asset or some investment, then whatever that thing is, it’s going to rise in price. This is really how we got out of the 2002 recession. The Fed put out free money and it took about 8 months before it started to find a home in RE. Then we were off to the races on RE prices. I suspect that gold may find itself in a similar situation. If it gathers popularity and there’s nothing else rising, cheap money will be forced into it and perhaps oil as well. Especially since all the currencies of the world are being inflated. It’s kind of a natural shift anyway…..too much paper and gold looks safer, and it’s going up in price. So it may feed on itself in that way and become self-fullfilling.Participant“Always” , a dangerous word in a dynamic world.
-
AuthorPosts
