Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
patientrenter
Participant[quote=JustLurking]Partypup is not a guy. [/quote]
LOL! Some probably already knew that from prior threads. For the rest, partypup’s 3rd post on this thread ended with “I’m so very frightened…”. Zero macho quotient. That gave the game away for the rest of us, apart from a stray reader who doesn’t pick up on social cues. Oh, in the movie, what was Borat’s defining quality? (No offense to our own resident Borat, just enjoying the humor here…)
Participant[quote=JustLurking]Partypup is not a guy. [/quote]
LOL! Some probably already knew that from prior threads. For the rest, partypup’s 3rd post on this thread ended with “I’m so very frightened…”. Zero macho quotient. That gave the game away for the rest of us, apart from a stray reader who doesn’t pick up on social cues. Oh, in the movie, what was Borat’s defining quality? (No offense to our own resident Borat, just enjoying the humor here…)
Participant[quote=JustLurking]Partypup is not a guy. [/quote]
LOL! Some probably already knew that from prior threads. For the rest, partypup’s 3rd post on this thread ended with “I’m so very frightened…”. Zero macho quotient. That gave the game away for the rest of us, apart from a stray reader who doesn’t pick up on social cues. Oh, in the movie, what was Borat’s defining quality? (No offense to our own resident Borat, just enjoying the humor here…)
Participant[quote=arnie]….From what I have been reading here, I am coming to the two following conclusions.
First, that the Federal efforts to fix housing are being made to help out owners of houses that are close to the national median price. San Diego is so off the charts compared to the rest of the country that most of the impact from the Federal government is not going to be felt here as opposed to, say, Iowa.
Second, that the Federal efforts to fix housing are in no way intended to prop up prices or to re-inflate the bubble. At this point, they know it will go down further, but are trying to prevent an overcorrection that is often seen in the aftermath of an asset bubble.
Having said that, I agree that the bottom is nowhere near in San Diego and, because of the above, that it will take longer and not have the deep overcorrection that many here have been hoping for.[/quote]
Arnie, the politicians pushing trillions of taxpayer money into housing now are not trying to restrict the benefit to low-value areas. Barney Frank is my local rep, and he is just as concerned about lawyers and doctors and others losing hundreds of thousands from their million-dollar Boston homes as he is about the “poor people” losing their last $1000 on a $100K home. (There aren’t any $100K homes in Boston.) Same is true for Chris Dodd, and Nancy Pelosi. Paupers and house millionaires have the same vote, so all are catered to, but the house millionaires usually contribute a little more at the PAC, so they get a little extra attention.
Participant[quote=arnie]….From what I have been reading here, I am coming to the two following conclusions.
First, that the Federal efforts to fix housing are being made to help out owners of houses that are close to the national median price. San Diego is so off the charts compared to the rest of the country that most of the impact from the Federal government is not going to be felt here as opposed to, say, Iowa.
Second, that the Federal efforts to fix housing are in no way intended to prop up prices or to re-inflate the bubble. At this point, they know it will go down further, but are trying to prevent an overcorrection that is often seen in the aftermath of an asset bubble.
Having said that, I agree that the bottom is nowhere near in San Diego and, because of the above, that it will take longer and not have the deep overcorrection that many here have been hoping for.[/quote]
Arnie, the politicians pushing trillions of taxpayer money into housing now are not trying to restrict the benefit to low-value areas. Barney Frank is my local rep, and he is just as concerned about lawyers and doctors and others losing hundreds of thousands from their million-dollar Boston homes as he is about the “poor people” losing their last $1000 on a $100K home. (There aren’t any $100K homes in Boston.) Same is true for Chris Dodd, and Nancy Pelosi. Paupers and house millionaires have the same vote, so all are catered to, but the house millionaires usually contribute a little more at the PAC, so they get a little extra attention.
Participant[quote=arnie]….From what I have been reading here, I am coming to the two following conclusions.
First, that the Federal efforts to fix housing are being made to help out owners of houses that are close to the national median price. San Diego is so off the charts compared to the rest of the country that most of the impact from the Federal government is not going to be felt here as opposed to, say, Iowa.
Second, that the Federal efforts to fix housing are in no way intended to prop up prices or to re-inflate the bubble. At this point, they know it will go down further, but are trying to prevent an overcorrection that is often seen in the aftermath of an asset bubble.
Having said that, I agree that the bottom is nowhere near in San Diego and, because of the above, that it will take longer and not have the deep overcorrection that many here have been hoping for.[/quote]
Arnie, the politicians pushing trillions of taxpayer money into housing now are not trying to restrict the benefit to low-value areas. Barney Frank is my local rep, and he is just as concerned about lawyers and doctors and others losing hundreds of thousands from their million-dollar Boston homes as he is about the “poor people” losing their last $1000 on a $100K home. (There aren’t any $100K homes in Boston.) Same is true for Chris Dodd, and Nancy Pelosi. Paupers and house millionaires have the same vote, so all are catered to, but the house millionaires usually contribute a little more at the PAC, so they get a little extra attention.
Participant[quote=arnie]….From what I have been reading here, I am coming to the two following conclusions.
First, that the Federal efforts to fix housing are being made to help out owners of houses that are close to the national median price. San Diego is so off the charts compared to the rest of the country that most of the impact from the Federal government is not going to be felt here as opposed to, say, Iowa.
Second, that the Federal efforts to fix housing are in no way intended to prop up prices or to re-inflate the bubble. At this point, they know it will go down further, but are trying to prevent an overcorrection that is often seen in the aftermath of an asset bubble.
Having said that, I agree that the bottom is nowhere near in San Diego and, because of the above, that it will take longer and not have the deep overcorrection that many here have been hoping for.[/quote]
Arnie, the politicians pushing trillions of taxpayer money into housing now are not trying to restrict the benefit to low-value areas. Barney Frank is my local rep, and he is just as concerned about lawyers and doctors and others losing hundreds of thousands from their million-dollar Boston homes as he is about the “poor people” losing their last $1000 on a $100K home. (There aren’t any $100K homes in Boston.) Same is true for Chris Dodd, and Nancy Pelosi. Paupers and house millionaires have the same vote, so all are catered to, but the house millionaires usually contribute a little more at the PAC, so they get a little extra attention.
Participant[quote=arnie]….From what I have been reading here, I am coming to the two following conclusions.
First, that the Federal efforts to fix housing are being made to help out owners of houses that are close to the national median price. San Diego is so off the charts compared to the rest of the country that most of the impact from the Federal government is not going to be felt here as opposed to, say, Iowa.
Second, that the Federal efforts to fix housing are in no way intended to prop up prices or to re-inflate the bubble. At this point, they know it will go down further, but are trying to prevent an overcorrection that is often seen in the aftermath of an asset bubble.
Having said that, I agree that the bottom is nowhere near in San Diego and, because of the above, that it will take longer and not have the deep overcorrection that many here have been hoping for.[/quote]
Arnie, the politicians pushing trillions of taxpayer money into housing now are not trying to restrict the benefit to low-value areas. Barney Frank is my local rep, and he is just as concerned about lawyers and doctors and others losing hundreds of thousands from their million-dollar Boston homes as he is about the “poor people” losing their last $1000 on a $100K home. (There aren’t any $100K homes in Boston.) Same is true for Chris Dodd, and Nancy Pelosi. Paupers and house millionaires have the same vote, so all are catered to, but the house millionaires usually contribute a little more at the PAC, so they get a little extra attention.
February 27, 2009 at 4:27 PM in reply to: Are Republicans exaggerating the effects of tax increases to small businesses? #356620Participant[quote=citydweller]Are Republicans exaggerating the effects of tax increases to small businesses?[/quote]
Yes. Next question, please.
February 27, 2009 at 4:27 PM in reply to: Are Republicans exaggerating the effects of tax increases to small businesses? #356925Participant[quote=citydweller]Are Republicans exaggerating the effects of tax increases to small businesses?[/quote]
Yes. Next question, please.
February 27, 2009 at 4:27 PM in reply to: Are Republicans exaggerating the effects of tax increases to small businesses? #357063Participant[quote=citydweller]Are Republicans exaggerating the effects of tax increases to small businesses?[/quote]
Yes. Next question, please.
February 27, 2009 at 4:27 PM in reply to: Are Republicans exaggerating the effects of tax increases to small businesses? #357089Participant[quote=citydweller]Are Republicans exaggerating the effects of tax increases to small businesses?[/quote]
Yes. Next question, please.
February 27, 2009 at 4:27 PM in reply to: Are Republicans exaggerating the effects of tax increases to small businesses? #357201Participant[quote=citydweller]Are Republicans exaggerating the effects of tax increases to small businesses?[/quote]
Yes. Next question, please.
ParticipantIt’s good to hear what Larry Yun thinks about this limit on mortgage interest deductions. Larry and the NAR have a lot of credibility. /snark off
-
AuthorPosts
