[paramount]

[quote=Blogstar]Since you are an expert on dogs, paramount, what is going on when a dog humps your leg? A male dog? How about when it is a female dog? What if your kids see all this? Would you let these dogs have puppies?[/quote]

Dog humping occurs when a dog is confused b/c they have been removed from the pack, or they want to dominate you.

[paramount]

scaredy, please allow me to clarify….

I’m not opposed to gay marriage
I’m not opposed to gay adoption
I am opposed to gays being recognized as a minority of any type

I do think children should be adopted to male/femaile nuclear families if at all possible
I do think the gay agenda should be kept out of elem school curriculums

As far as degrees of being gay and all of that, it hurts my head to even ponder that so I don’t even wade into those waters. I’m not that wise.

Is being gay natural? I’m not sure, but please consider the following:

If 2 animals of the same sex (male in this example) are in an enclosed area long enough, they may attempt to hump each other. And that fact is often held up by the gay community to assert that being gay is normal.

However, if a female is thrown into the mix there won’t be any gay humping.

Disclaimer: Don’t try this at home…

[paramount]

[quote=temeculaguy]Or maybe it’s just some guys who went to harvard and think that they are smarter than you and will get you to give them your money.[/quote]

Seems more plausible, I’ll give you that much…

[paramount]

Or maybe this is all part of the NWO/OWC!

[paramount]

[quote=jeff303]

Granted, there is still the issue of acceptance for goods/services, but that has been gradually changing and will likely continue to in the near future.[/quote]

Bitcoin is perhaps just the 1st iteration of open source money.

Yes, the dollar does have the world’s most powerful military behind it, which is why the world is and will continue to move away from the dollar.

More and more countries around the world have realized peace is a lot cheaper and more preferable to endless war.

Humans are evolving to a new higher enlightened level of consciousness, and in this Brave New World Bitcoin fits perfectly. The dollar doesn’t.

[paramount]

[quote=Blogstar]Whoa, the Oxnard cholo cop unclipped his gun holster to take a cell phone from an innocent person on a low rider bike( I suspect he was on a low rider bike because I lived there during HS.)…To be fair it is probably hard to get high level individuals to be cops in Oxnard. Well that might be true about almost any place, but Oxnard especially.

I bet the cop’s gang got out gang-banged by eastlake when he was a kid and he holds a grudge.[/quote]

He took his camera, he’s lucky he didn’t take his life.

The person filming the incident is very brave; on par with the filming of a gang committing a crime. Oops, my bad, that’s what he was doing…

[paramount]

The world has had enough of dollar domination.

That’s one reason bitcoin is taking off; central banks will try to shut it down if it becomes to much of a threat.

And yet, open source money (bitcoin or it’s successor) is here to stay.

[paramount]

[quote=Blogstar]
But yeah, homosexuals can have kids, she could have found a gay man to do the deed. They can make babies for each other and/or adopt. Sperm bank sounds less complicated.[/quote]

Then in that case is the original couple really having the child, or is the gay man and the lesbian woman actually having the child? They gay man IS the father.

Yes, they can adopt, but that is not the same as “having” a baby. Not better or worse, just a different process.

Are we now going to defy biology? we don’t get to make those rules. It is what it is…I can’t change that and neither can you.

But in general I do believe an adopted child is best placed in a home with a mother (female) and father (male).

[paramount]

[quote=FlyerInHi] Gay people getting married and having kids might contribute to that.

[/quote]

Uh…sounds like we need to have a talk?

[paramount]

[quote=all]

Not even ‘the breadstick and the napkin ring’ lunch area game? That’s a big one in Temecula.[/quote]

Please, enough with the perversion of napkins. Is nothing sacred?

[paramount]

[quote=temeculaguy]Admittedly, I only read the first and eighth page, but paramount is a Temecula resident, residing in a community with the largest per capita Mormon population in California.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temecula,_California

near the bottom, under religion.

My kids joke that they went to Brigham Young High, because the administrative staff and many of the students were Mormon.

So if the most conservative (and heavily Mormon) school district makes a person sick, is it reality or perception. [/quote]

I don’t see this as a religious issue at all.

I’m not even a particularly “religious” person.

Since common core has taken over local control of schools is negligible.

[paramount]

Wow. These comments show how perverse a good portion of the population in California is or has become.

My position is: No sex education (no matter how subtle) at all in Public Elem Schools.

But I do understand the fervor: The “radical” gay agenda crowd wants to impose their views on the youngest, most impressionable and innocent in our society. It is homosexual indoctrination on the most vulnerable in society.

I am not aware of any hetero groups trying to do the same. They’re aren’t any.

Sick. Really sick.

[paramount]

[quote=urbanrealtor]

Your version of morality is nuts and a pretty good example of why having kids should require a license.[/quote]

No License needed.

The one thing that is needed is NOT to be gay.

I’ve never heard of one gay couple creating a child of and on their own. Have you? Anyone else?

Ah, silence….that’s what I thought.

[paramount]

I really thought the end game (of Obamacare) was to end up with 5 or 6 large health care insurers.

Sort of like the Chase, BOFA’s of health insurance.

[paramount]

[quote=6packscaredy]

my college kid is totally functional. SDSU is just right. He can get high grades in science and math classes, where his nontotallydriven self might not have gotten them in a UC school. i think there’s something to be said for less competition…

[/quote]

SDSU has a lower acceptance rate than UCSD:

30% (2010)
San Diego State University, Acceptance rate

35.5% (2011)
University of California, San Diego, Acceptance rate

[Author]

Posts