Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 5, 2010 at 1:39 PM in reply to: OT: so this is what our soldiers are dying for in Afghanistan? #601407September 5, 2010 at 1:39 PM in reply to: OT: so this is what our soldiers are dying for in Afghanistan? #601725
ocrenter
Participant[quote=briansd1]
I don’t see why homosexuality should be prevented. Gays lead perfectly happy, creative lives, if only we just let them.
Gays have created great things and we would lose a lot if homosexuality were prevented.
To me, heterosexuality or homosexuality are equally as healthy.
I believe we are all bi-sexual but that we lean one way or the other. The environment then reinforces certain behavior. As you pointed out, availability has a lot to do with desire. Males, or females, people generally make do with what they can get.[/quote]
not saying that homosexuality should be prevented. just that the science will evolve to a point where homosexuality can be prevented. and even thought we as a society is making great stride to provide equality for them, there will always be a desire on the part of parents to have “normal” heterosexual children. and given the choice, most parents will say yes to preventive therapy that will prevent their children from being homosexual.
just saying that paradoxically, advances in science will help homosexuals in their argument that it is biological and therefore they should have equal rights, but the same science may lead to their eventual decline in number.
September 5, 2010 at 5:11 AM in reply to: OT: Renting a place in NYC from Craiglist (2 weeks)… #600593ocrenter
ParticipantThis one has the mark of a Nigerian scam all over it. ox is right about the United States in the address. Along the same vain is “Manhattan,NYC.”
The biggest tip off is the price. Why $125/night when everything on VRBO are over $200/night?
Cheers…Best regards… and please send the money order to Nigeria where Shelton and Itorria just so happen are vacationing and building a Christian school for deaf and blind orphans.
September 5, 2010 at 5:11 AM in reply to: OT: Renting a place in NYC from Craiglist (2 weeks)… #600684ocrenter
ParticipantThis one has the mark of a Nigerian scam all over it. ox is right about the United States in the address. Along the same vain is “Manhattan,NYC.”
The biggest tip off is the price. Why $125/night when everything on VRBO are over $200/night?
Cheers…Best regards… and please send the money order to Nigeria where Shelton and Itorria just so happen are vacationing and building a Christian school for deaf and blind orphans.
September 5, 2010 at 5:11 AM in reply to: OT: Renting a place in NYC from Craiglist (2 weeks)… #601231ocrenter
ParticipantThis one has the mark of a Nigerian scam all over it. ox is right about the United States in the address. Along the same vain is “Manhattan,NYC.”
The biggest tip off is the price. Why $125/night when everything on VRBO are over $200/night?
Cheers…Best regards… and please send the money order to Nigeria where Shelton and Itorria just so happen are vacationing and building a Christian school for deaf and blind orphans.
September 5, 2010 at 5:11 AM in reply to: OT: Renting a place in NYC from Craiglist (2 weeks)… #601337ocrenter
ParticipantThis one has the mark of a Nigerian scam all over it. ox is right about the United States in the address. Along the same vain is “Manhattan,NYC.”
The biggest tip off is the price. Why $125/night when everything on VRBO are over $200/night?
Cheers…Best regards… and please send the money order to Nigeria where Shelton and Itorria just so happen are vacationing and building a Christian school for deaf and blind orphans.
September 5, 2010 at 5:11 AM in reply to: OT: Renting a place in NYC from Craiglist (2 weeks)… #601655ocrenter
ParticipantThis one has the mark of a Nigerian scam all over it. ox is right about the United States in the address. Along the same vain is “Manhattan,NYC.”
The biggest tip off is the price. Why $125/night when everything on VRBO are over $200/night?
Cheers…Best regards… and please send the money order to Nigeria where Shelton and Itorria just so happen are vacationing and building a Christian school for deaf and blind orphans.
September 5, 2010 at 4:11 AM in reply to: OT: so this is what our soldiers are dying for in Afghanistan? #600588ocrenter
Participantwhat this article really demonstrate is this:
male sexual desire for female is healthy and should not be discouraged. for if females are removed from the equation (ie in prison, in priesthood, or by completely covering them up and making them walk around in bed sheets as if they are pretending to be ghosts on Halloween), the result is the same everywhere: that deviant and perverse sexual behavior will then start to emerge.
now this is completely different than homosexuality, which I believe is completely biological. we have a lot of scientific evidence to suggest this.
however, this does not make science a friend of the GLBT community, as this article demonstrates:
http://articles.latimes.com/2010/aug/15/news/sns-health-adrenal-treatment
in fact, by refusing to admit that homosexuality is biological, the church is in fact allowing homosexuality to continue. whereas science, by recognizing homosexuality is in fact a condition caused by too much exposure of the wrong hormone in utero, we might head down toward a path of finding a treatment that may prevent future homosexuals.
September 5, 2010 at 4:11 AM in reply to: OT: so this is what our soldiers are dying for in Afghanistan? #600679ocrenter
Participantwhat this article really demonstrate is this:
male sexual desire for female is healthy and should not be discouraged. for if females are removed from the equation (ie in prison, in priesthood, or by completely covering them up and making them walk around in bed sheets as if they are pretending to be ghosts on Halloween), the result is the same everywhere: that deviant and perverse sexual behavior will then start to emerge.
now this is completely different than homosexuality, which I believe is completely biological. we have a lot of scientific evidence to suggest this.
however, this does not make science a friend of the GLBT community, as this article demonstrates:
http://articles.latimes.com/2010/aug/15/news/sns-health-adrenal-treatment
in fact, by refusing to admit that homosexuality is biological, the church is in fact allowing homosexuality to continue. whereas science, by recognizing homosexuality is in fact a condition caused by too much exposure of the wrong hormone in utero, we might head down toward a path of finding a treatment that may prevent future homosexuals.
September 5, 2010 at 4:11 AM in reply to: OT: so this is what our soldiers are dying for in Afghanistan? #601226ocrenter
Participantwhat this article really demonstrate is this:
male sexual desire for female is healthy and should not be discouraged. for if females are removed from the equation (ie in prison, in priesthood, or by completely covering them up and making them walk around in bed sheets as if they are pretending to be ghosts on Halloween), the result is the same everywhere: that deviant and perverse sexual behavior will then start to emerge.
now this is completely different than homosexuality, which I believe is completely biological. we have a lot of scientific evidence to suggest this.
however, this does not make science a friend of the GLBT community, as this article demonstrates:
http://articles.latimes.com/2010/aug/15/news/sns-health-adrenal-treatment
in fact, by refusing to admit that homosexuality is biological, the church is in fact allowing homosexuality to continue. whereas science, by recognizing homosexuality is in fact a condition caused by too much exposure of the wrong hormone in utero, we might head down toward a path of finding a treatment that may prevent future homosexuals.
September 5, 2010 at 4:11 AM in reply to: OT: so this is what our soldiers are dying for in Afghanistan? #601332ocrenter
Participantwhat this article really demonstrate is this:
male sexual desire for female is healthy and should not be discouraged. for if females are removed from the equation (ie in prison, in priesthood, or by completely covering them up and making them walk around in bed sheets as if they are pretending to be ghosts on Halloween), the result is the same everywhere: that deviant and perverse sexual behavior will then start to emerge.
now this is completely different than homosexuality, which I believe is completely biological. we have a lot of scientific evidence to suggest this.
however, this does not make science a friend of the GLBT community, as this article demonstrates:
http://articles.latimes.com/2010/aug/15/news/sns-health-adrenal-treatment
in fact, by refusing to admit that homosexuality is biological, the church is in fact allowing homosexuality to continue. whereas science, by recognizing homosexuality is in fact a condition caused by too much exposure of the wrong hormone in utero, we might head down toward a path of finding a treatment that may prevent future homosexuals.
September 5, 2010 at 4:11 AM in reply to: OT: so this is what our soldiers are dying for in Afghanistan? #601650ocrenter
Participantwhat this article really demonstrate is this:
male sexual desire for female is healthy and should not be discouraged. for if females are removed from the equation (ie in prison, in priesthood, or by completely covering them up and making them walk around in bed sheets as if they are pretending to be ghosts on Halloween), the result is the same everywhere: that deviant and perverse sexual behavior will then start to emerge.
now this is completely different than homosexuality, which I believe is completely biological. we have a lot of scientific evidence to suggest this.
however, this does not make science a friend of the GLBT community, as this article demonstrates:
http://articles.latimes.com/2010/aug/15/news/sns-health-adrenal-treatment
in fact, by refusing to admit that homosexuality is biological, the church is in fact allowing homosexuality to continue. whereas science, by recognizing homosexuality is in fact a condition caused by too much exposure of the wrong hormone in utero, we might head down toward a path of finding a treatment that may prevent future homosexuals.
ocrenter
Participant[quote=deadzone]Evelyn lin isn’t particularly hot, pretty average looking if you compare her to the asian co-eds at UCSD. Clearly she is popular cause she likes to take it in the can.[/quote]
that’s very true. She is quite average in looks. One look and I knew she couldn’t possibly be Taiwanese. Yet she has a proto-typical Taiwanese last name. Very odd. Then I searched google and realized that she changed her Zhang Li (very Chinese) to a Taiwanese sounding last name.
ocrenter
Participant[quote=deadzone]Evelyn lin isn’t particularly hot, pretty average looking if you compare her to the asian co-eds at UCSD. Clearly she is popular cause she likes to take it in the can.[/quote]
that’s very true. She is quite average in looks. One look and I knew she couldn’t possibly be Taiwanese. Yet she has a proto-typical Taiwanese last name. Very odd. Then I searched google and realized that she changed her Zhang Li (very Chinese) to a Taiwanese sounding last name.
ocrenter
Participant[quote=deadzone]Evelyn lin isn’t particularly hot, pretty average looking if you compare her to the asian co-eds at UCSD. Clearly she is popular cause she likes to take it in the can.[/quote]
that’s very true. She is quite average in looks. One look and I knew she couldn’t possibly be Taiwanese. Yet she has a proto-typical Taiwanese last name. Very odd. Then I searched google and realized that she changed her Zhang Li (very Chinese) to a Taiwanese sounding last name.
-
AuthorPosts
