Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
NotCranky
ParticipantHlS Is the original post supported by what you are seeing? Anything like a bump in refi action , if so, what is a representative client profile.
Thanks,If you get a chance to respond.ParticipantHlS Is the original post supported by what you are seeing? Anything like a bump in refi action , if so, what is a representative client profile.
Thanks,If you get a chance to respond.ParticipantHlS Is the original post supported by what you are seeing? Anything like a bump in refi action , if so, what is a representative client profile.
Thanks,If you get a chance to respond.ParticipantHlS Is the original post supported by what you are seeing? Anything like a bump in refi action , if so, what is a representative client profile.
Thanks,If you get a chance to respond.ParticipantHlS Is the original post supported by what you are seeing? Anything like a bump in refi action , if so, what is a representative client profile.
Thanks,If you get a chance to respond.ParticipantRicechex,
Including 92104 makes sense, I had even thought about that earlier in the day. I am still pondering what to include. Do you have any suggestions?DCRogers, That property is still listed as a short sale. As SDR has discussed it could be subject to pricing that the lender just won’t accept or any other kind of rigmarole.
I have been reluctant to start a thread like this, even though I have been encouraged to, because I feel sensitive to the owners who are likely going through a tough time. I don’t want to do something that amounts to gossip on my part. I guess I will try to walk that fine line.
I think sdr has done a good job keeping his “Carmel Valley Monitor” data oriented and keeping the stories to a minimum. I am not sure 92104 & 92116 will have the same data as that. I will try to get something started in the next couple of days on both zip codes,one thread.Again, suggestions appreciated.ParticipantRicechex,
Including 92104 makes sense, I had even thought about that earlier in the day. I am still pondering what to include. Do you have any suggestions?DCRogers, That property is still listed as a short sale. As SDR has discussed it could be subject to pricing that the lender just won’t accept or any other kind of rigmarole.
I have been reluctant to start a thread like this, even though I have been encouraged to, because I feel sensitive to the owners who are likely going through a tough time. I don’t want to do something that amounts to gossip on my part. I guess I will try to walk that fine line.
I think sdr has done a good job keeping his “Carmel Valley Monitor” data oriented and keeping the stories to a minimum. I am not sure 92104 & 92116 will have the same data as that. I will try to get something started in the next couple of days on both zip codes,one thread.Again, suggestions appreciated.ParticipantRicechex,
Including 92104 makes sense, I had even thought about that earlier in the day. I am still pondering what to include. Do you have any suggestions?DCRogers, That property is still listed as a short sale. As SDR has discussed it could be subject to pricing that the lender just won’t accept or any other kind of rigmarole.
I have been reluctant to start a thread like this, even though I have been encouraged to, because I feel sensitive to the owners who are likely going through a tough time. I don’t want to do something that amounts to gossip on my part. I guess I will try to walk that fine line.
I think sdr has done a good job keeping his “Carmel Valley Monitor” data oriented and keeping the stories to a minimum. I am not sure 92104 & 92116 will have the same data as that. I will try to get something started in the next couple of days on both zip codes,one thread.Again, suggestions appreciated.ParticipantRicechex,
Including 92104 makes sense, I had even thought about that earlier in the day. I am still pondering what to include. Do you have any suggestions?DCRogers, That property is still listed as a short sale. As SDR has discussed it could be subject to pricing that the lender just won’t accept or any other kind of rigmarole.
I have been reluctant to start a thread like this, even though I have been encouraged to, because I feel sensitive to the owners who are likely going through a tough time. I don’t want to do something that amounts to gossip on my part. I guess I will try to walk that fine line.
I think sdr has done a good job keeping his “Carmel Valley Monitor” data oriented and keeping the stories to a minimum. I am not sure 92104 & 92116 will have the same data as that. I will try to get something started in the next couple of days on both zip codes,one thread.Again, suggestions appreciated.ParticipantRicechex,
Including 92104 makes sense, I had even thought about that earlier in the day. I am still pondering what to include. Do you have any suggestions?DCRogers, That property is still listed as a short sale. As SDR has discussed it could be subject to pricing that the lender just won’t accept or any other kind of rigmarole.
I have been reluctant to start a thread like this, even though I have been encouraged to, because I feel sensitive to the owners who are likely going through a tough time. I don’t want to do something that amounts to gossip on my part. I guess I will try to walk that fine line.
I think sdr has done a good job keeping his “Carmel Valley Monitor” data oriented and keeping the stories to a minimum. I am not sure 92104 & 92116 will have the same data as that. I will try to get something started in the next couple of days on both zip codes,one thread.Again, suggestions appreciated.ParticipantBugs, sure there is a long way to go on the whole fallout,any bail outs, technical bottom ect. However my own personal history of having picked up a place in 1992 at nearly 40% below the previous owner seems to indicate that it could happen again. That is, that good deals could be had years before the technical bottom.
That property never went below what I bought it for. Unfortunately, I sold it for a gain that is considered good in normal times in 1998. I was by no means the only one who benefited by buying in that area of the cycle. Until I see possibilities like that fail to appear I am going to believe they can ,perhaps, even in the near future my guess is latesummer2008 or 2009 for sure.
In support of those who say we are very negative, I will point out that we rarely dwell on any possibility that buying particular properties In San Diego,well before the technical bottom, could prove to be lucrative or at least O.K.
ParticipantBugs, sure there is a long way to go on the whole fallout,any bail outs, technical bottom ect. However my own personal history of having picked up a place in 1992 at nearly 40% below the previous owner seems to indicate that it could happen again. That is, that good deals could be had years before the technical bottom.
That property never went below what I bought it for. Unfortunately, I sold it for a gain that is considered good in normal times in 1998. I was by no means the only one who benefited by buying in that area of the cycle. Until I see possibilities like that fail to appear I am going to believe they can ,perhaps, even in the near future my guess is latesummer2008 or 2009 for sure.
In support of those who say we are very negative, I will point out that we rarely dwell on any possibility that buying particular properties In San Diego,well before the technical bottom, could prove to be lucrative or at least O.K.
ParticipantBugs, sure there is a long way to go on the whole fallout,any bail outs, technical bottom ect. However my own personal history of having picked up a place in 1992 at nearly 40% below the previous owner seems to indicate that it could happen again. That is, that good deals could be had years before the technical bottom.
That property never went below what I bought it for. Unfortunately, I sold it for a gain that is considered good in normal times in 1998. I was by no means the only one who benefited by buying in that area of the cycle. Until I see possibilities like that fail to appear I am going to believe they can ,perhaps, even in the near future my guess is latesummer2008 or 2009 for sure.
In support of those who say we are very negative, I will point out that we rarely dwell on any possibility that buying particular properties In San Diego,well before the technical bottom, could prove to be lucrative or at least O.K.
ParticipantBugs, sure there is a long way to go on the whole fallout,any bail outs, technical bottom ect. However my own personal history of having picked up a place in 1992 at nearly 40% below the previous owner seems to indicate that it could happen again. That is, that good deals could be had years before the technical bottom.
That property never went below what I bought it for. Unfortunately, I sold it for a gain that is considered good in normal times in 1998. I was by no means the only one who benefited by buying in that area of the cycle. Until I see possibilities like that fail to appear I am going to believe they can ,perhaps, even in the near future my guess is latesummer2008 or 2009 for sure.
In support of those who say we are very negative, I will point out that we rarely dwell on any possibility that buying particular properties In San Diego,well before the technical bottom, could prove to be lucrative or at least O.K.
-
AuthorPosts
