[NotCranky]

It may be unlikely, but it could happen.

Being that Obama turned out democrat the likely hood is very great. Just kidding!

[NotCranky]

I knew a family during my childhood that claimed to be ‘Atheists’, yet the mother said that she believed there may be a higher power at work sometimes, but didn’t acknowledge that it was GOD. I guess she wasn’t a traditional Atheist.

People are not born atheists or believers. They become one or the other, usually believer first in this age. When one, through personal growth or life experience or what not becomes atheistic they can become plagued by certain schisms because the early conditioning is very strong. Not to say that one can’t go from atheist to believer and have the same problem. Anyway the atheist bound person may revert to praying and such intermittently or just decide that they can handle both praying or believing on occasion, this would be an intentionally schismatic individual. Eventually they decide the praying part is simply talking to themselves and they drop it, almost completely or completely. Old habits die hard. Agnosticism and deism are different and etiher may apply to the woman in question. I guess I would call my self agnostic but I don’t believe attaching a religious label to myself is really very important. The fact that other people do is a big topic of interest.
Sorry to anyone who already knew this stuff.

[NotCranky]

I knew a family during my childhood that claimed to be ‘Atheists’, yet the mother said that she believed there may be a higher power at work sometimes, but didn’t acknowledge that it was GOD. I guess she wasn’t a traditional Atheist.

People are not born atheists or believers. They become one or the other, usually believer first in this age. When one, through personal growth or life experience or what not becomes atheistic they can become plagued by certain schisms because the early conditioning is very strong. Not to say that one can’t go from atheist to believer and have the same problem. Anyway the atheist bound person may revert to praying and such intermittently or just decide that they can handle both praying or believing on occasion, this would be an intentionally schismatic individual. Eventually they decide the praying part is simply talking to themselves and they drop it, almost completely or completely. Old habits die hard. Agnosticism and deism are different and etiher may apply to the woman in question. I guess I would call my self agnostic but I don’t believe attaching a religious label to myself is really very important. The fact that other people do is a big topic of interest.
Sorry to anyone who already knew this stuff.

[NotCranky]

I knew a family during my childhood that claimed to be ‘Atheists’, yet the mother said that she believed there may be a higher power at work sometimes, but didn’t acknowledge that it was GOD. I guess she wasn’t a traditional Atheist.

People are not born atheists or believers. They become one or the other, usually believer first in this age. When one, through personal growth or life experience or what not becomes atheistic they can become plagued by certain schisms because the early conditioning is very strong. Not to say that one can’t go from atheist to believer and have the same problem. Anyway the atheist bound person may revert to praying and such intermittently or just decide that they can handle both praying or believing on occasion, this would be an intentionally schismatic individual. Eventually they decide the praying part is simply talking to themselves and they drop it, almost completely or completely. Old habits die hard. Agnosticism and deism are different and etiher may apply to the woman in question. I guess I would call my self agnostic but I don’t believe attaching a religious label to myself is really very important. The fact that other people do is a big topic of interest.
Sorry to anyone who already knew this stuff.

[NotCranky]

I knew a family during my childhood that claimed to be ‘Atheists’, yet the mother said that she believed there may be a higher power at work sometimes, but didn’t acknowledge that it was GOD. I guess she wasn’t a traditional Atheist.

People are not born atheists or believers. They become one or the other, usually believer first in this age. When one, through personal growth or life experience or what not becomes atheistic they can become plagued by certain schisms because the early conditioning is very strong. Not to say that one can’t go from atheist to believer and have the same problem. Anyway the atheist bound person may revert to praying and such intermittently or just decide that they can handle both praying or believing on occasion, this would be an intentionally schismatic individual. Eventually they decide the praying part is simply talking to themselves and they drop it, almost completely or completely. Old habits die hard. Agnosticism and deism are different and etiher may apply to the woman in question. I guess I would call my self agnostic but I don’t believe attaching a religious label to myself is really very important. The fact that other people do is a big topic of interest.
Sorry to anyone who already knew this stuff.

[NotCranky]

I knew a family during my childhood that claimed to be ‘Atheists’, yet the mother said that she believed there may be a higher power at work sometimes, but didn’t acknowledge that it was GOD. I guess she wasn’t a traditional Atheist.

People are not born atheists or believers. They become one or the other, usually believer first in this age. When one, through personal growth or life experience or what not becomes atheistic they can become plagued by certain schisms because the early conditioning is very strong. Not to say that one can’t go from atheist to believer and have the same problem. Anyway the atheist bound person may revert to praying and such intermittently or just decide that they can handle both praying or believing on occasion, this would be an intentionally schismatic individual. Eventually they decide the praying part is simply talking to themselves and they drop it, almost completely or completely. Old habits die hard. Agnosticism and deism are different and etiher may apply to the woman in question. I guess I would call my self agnostic but I don’t believe attaching a religious label to myself is really very important. The fact that other people do is a big topic of interest.
Sorry to anyone who already knew this stuff.

[NotCranky]

Thanks you sdr for creating this thread. I am making a newsletter for my clients from it and will frame a copy :).

So what do you all think of the next six months to a year can we have a “big chunk” come off from current prices? Will a faster rate of decline get a hold of more prestigious locations, like Jamul? It does seem to be doing so. Will it revert to a slow decline like the first two years from peak? My opinion is about four post up so let’s see how I feel about this thread in 6-12 months.

What if we have a repeat of this last six months in either the first half or second half of next year or both? WOW! It certainly seems the road would start flattening out around then. It looks like the appreciation of the phony years can come of as fast as it went on. Maybe it will or maybe it won’t continue . The market apparently has no built in barrier to an outright crash. Re-write the stuff or let it sit.

[NotCranky]

Thanks you sdr for creating this thread. I am making a newsletter for my clients from it and will frame a copy :).

So what do you all think of the next six months to a year can we have a “big chunk” come off from current prices? Will a faster rate of decline get a hold of more prestigious locations, like Jamul? It does seem to be doing so. Will it revert to a slow decline like the first two years from peak? My opinion is about four post up so let’s see how I feel about this thread in 6-12 months.

What if we have a repeat of this last six months in either the first half or second half of next year or both? WOW! It certainly seems the road would start flattening out around then. It looks like the appreciation of the phony years can come of as fast as it went on. Maybe it will or maybe it won’t continue . The market apparently has no built in barrier to an outright crash. Re-write the stuff or let it sit.

[NotCranky]

Thanks you sdr for creating this thread. I am making a newsletter for my clients from it and will frame a copy :).

So what do you all think of the next six months to a year can we have a “big chunk” come off from current prices? Will a faster rate of decline get a hold of more prestigious locations, like Jamul? It does seem to be doing so. Will it revert to a slow decline like the first two years from peak? My opinion is about four post up so let’s see how I feel about this thread in 6-12 months.

What if we have a repeat of this last six months in either the first half or second half of next year or both? WOW! It certainly seems the road would start flattening out around then. It looks like the appreciation of the phony years can come of as fast as it went on. Maybe it will or maybe it won’t continue . The market apparently has no built in barrier to an outright crash. Re-write the stuff or let it sit.

[NotCranky]

Thanks you sdr for creating this thread. I am making a newsletter for my clients from it and will frame a copy :).

So what do you all think of the next six months to a year can we have a “big chunk” come off from current prices? Will a faster rate of decline get a hold of more prestigious locations, like Jamul? It does seem to be doing so. Will it revert to a slow decline like the first two years from peak? My opinion is about four post up so let’s see how I feel about this thread in 6-12 months.

What if we have a repeat of this last six months in either the first half or second half of next year or both? WOW! It certainly seems the road would start flattening out around then. It looks like the appreciation of the phony years can come of as fast as it went on. Maybe it will or maybe it won’t continue . The market apparently has no built in barrier to an outright crash. Re-write the stuff or let it sit.

[NotCranky]

Thanks you sdr for creating this thread. I am making a newsletter for my clients from it and will frame a copy :).

So what do you all think of the next six months to a year can we have a “big chunk” come off from current prices? Will a faster rate of decline get a hold of more prestigious locations, like Jamul? It does seem to be doing so. Will it revert to a slow decline like the first two years from peak? My opinion is about four post up so let’s see how I feel about this thread in 6-12 months.

What if we have a repeat of this last six months in either the first half or second half of next year or both? WOW! It certainly seems the road would start flattening out around then. It looks like the appreciation of the phony years can come of as fast as it went on. Maybe it will or maybe it won’t continue . The market apparently has no built in barrier to an outright crash. Re-write the stuff or let it sit.

[NotCranky]

Thanks,
That letter explained the methodologies for setting the limit quite well. It seems like it would be highly unusual for the limits to go up in 2009.

[NotCranky]

Thanks,
That letter explained the methodologies for setting the limit quite well. It seems like it would be highly unusual for the limits to go up in 2009.

[NotCranky]

Thanks,
That letter explained the methodologies for setting the limit quite well. It seems like it would be highly unusual for the limits to go up in 2009.

[NotCranky]

Thanks,
That letter explained the methodologies for setting the limit quite well. It seems like it would be highly unusual for the limits to go up in 2009.

[Author]

Posts