Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
NotCranky
ParticipantO.K. here is a swath of the heart of Del Cerro active to pending. I used the Thomas Bro’s map and MLS. It is just for and Idea. A few properties will be missed as I avoided as best as possible ,surrounding areas.
20/6, all look like viable escrows(for now).
ParticipantO.K. here is a swath of the heart of Del Cerro active to pending. I used the Thomas Bro’s map and MLS. It is just for and Idea. A few properties will be missed as I avoided as best as possible ,surrounding areas.
20/6, all look like viable escrows(for now).
ParticipantO.K. here is a swath of the heart of Del Cerro active to pending. I used the Thomas Bro’s map and MLS. It is just for and Idea. A few properties will be missed as I avoided as best as possible ,surrounding areas.
20/6, all look like viable escrows(for now).
ParticipantBUGs
There I go again missed the 10% My bad. I don’t think 10% percent should phase anyone smart or conservative. I personally play it ,would play it, so far below the standard metrics as far as risk goes That 30-40% wouldn’t do much to me. This is a matter of frugality more than wealth(no e-balling).ParticipantBUGs
There I go again missed the 10% My bad. I don’t think 10% percent should phase anyone smart or conservative. I personally play it ,would play it, so far below the standard metrics as far as risk goes That 30-40% wouldn’t do much to me. This is a matter of frugality more than wealth(no e-balling).ParticipantBUGs
There I go again missed the 10% My bad. I don’t think 10% percent should phase anyone smart or conservative. I personally play it ,would play it, so far below the standard metrics as far as risk goes That 30-40% wouldn’t do much to me. This is a matter of frugality more than wealth(no e-balling).ParticipantBUGs
There I go again missed the 10% My bad. I don’t think 10% percent should phase anyone smart or conservative. I personally play it ,would play it, so far below the standard metrics as far as risk goes That 30-40% wouldn’t do much to me. This is a matter of frugality more than wealth(no e-balling).ParticipantBUGs
There I go again missed the 10% My bad. I don’t think 10% percent should phase anyone smart or conservative. I personally play it ,would play it, so far below the standard metrics as far as risk goes That 30-40% wouldn’t do much to me. This is a matter of frugality more than wealth(no e-balling).Participant“Rental houses are just another substitute for rental apartments.”
I don’t agree, Rental houses come with more or less dirt and in some regards can be thought of as a land bank with cashflow. This benefit is more likely to be realized in some areas property types then others.OTOH, I could be completely wrong about all this and we might be looking at the “new paradigm”, where the old rules don’t apply.
With all due respect bugs I think your outlook requires a new paradigm as much as the bullish one’s do. I appreciate it that you are admitting the possibility of being wrong as we all are in that boat.
Participant“Rental houses are just another substitute for rental apartments.”
I don’t agree, Rental houses come with more or less dirt and in some regards can be thought of as a land bank with cashflow. This benefit is more likely to be realized in some areas property types then others.OTOH, I could be completely wrong about all this and we might be looking at the “new paradigm”, where the old rules don’t apply.
With all due respect bugs I think your outlook requires a new paradigm as much as the bullish one’s do. I appreciate it that you are admitting the possibility of being wrong as we all are in that boat.
Participant“Rental houses are just another substitute for rental apartments.”
I don’t agree, Rental houses come with more or less dirt and in some regards can be thought of as a land bank with cashflow. This benefit is more likely to be realized in some areas property types then others.OTOH, I could be completely wrong about all this and we might be looking at the “new paradigm”, where the old rules don’t apply.
With all due respect bugs I think your outlook requires a new paradigm as much as the bullish one’s do. I appreciate it that you are admitting the possibility of being wrong as we all are in that boat.
Participant“Rental houses are just another substitute for rental apartments.”
I don’t agree, Rental houses come with more or less dirt and in some regards can be thought of as a land bank with cashflow. This benefit is more likely to be realized in some areas property types then others.OTOH, I could be completely wrong about all this and we might be looking at the “new paradigm”, where the old rules don’t apply.
With all due respect bugs I think your outlook requires a new paradigm as much as the bullish one’s do. I appreciate it that you are admitting the possibility of being wrong as we all are in that boat.
Participant“Rental houses are just another substitute for rental apartments.”
I don’t agree, Rental houses come with more or less dirt and in some regards can be thought of as a land bank with cashflow. This benefit is more likely to be realized in some areas property types then others.OTOH, I could be completely wrong about all this and we might be looking at the “new paradigm”, where the old rules don’t apply.
With all due respect bugs I think your outlook requires a new paradigm as much as the bullish one’s do. I appreciate it that you are admitting the possibility of being wrong as we all are in that boat.
Participant“FLU you made a pretty good point about the rentals.”
Excellent comments on that point.
Regarding 30-40 percent rental drops, Isn’t that Very bearish possibilty why someone a little more optimiststic doesn’t overleverage and diversifies? It is only a risk of drops not a fact. I would be concerned about it more or less on a case by case basis.
I’ll read your post again bugs.
-
AuthorPosts
